You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015193641


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015193641

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,639,310 Jun 12, 2027 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
7,598,257 Jun 24, 2028 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
7,598,257 Jun 24, 2028 Incyte Corp JAKAFI ruxolitinib phosphate
8,415,362 Jun 24, 2028 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
8,415,362 Jun 24, 2028 Incyte Corp JAKAFI ruxolitinib phosphate
9,079,912 Jun 12, 2027 Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate
9,079,912 Jun 12, 2027 Incyte Corp JAKAFI ruxolitinib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2015193641

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015193641 pertains to innovative advancements in pharmaceutical compositions or methods, a domain characterized by intense research activities and robust patent protections. This patent's scope and claims define its market exclusivity, influence intra-industry competitiveness, and shape the patent landscape within Japan and Globally.

This analysis provides a comprehensive examination of JP2015193641, covering its technical scope, claim structure, and positioning within current patent landscapes. Understanding these facets enables stakeholders to evaluate its IP strength, potential for licensing, and the competitive environment.


Overview of JP2015193641

Japan patent application JP2015193641 was published on December 17, 2015, and claims priority from earlier applications filed in 2014. While exact technical details require precise claim review, publicly available disclosures suggest it relates to pharmaceutical compositions, possibly involving novel active ingredients, delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic methods.

The patent endeavours to address unmet needs in designated therapeutic areas, potentially encompassing areas like oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, reflecting a typical scope for modern pharmaceuticals seeking broad protection.


Scope of the Patent

Technical Field and Purpose

JP2015193641 likely falls within the pharmaceutical or medical formulations domain, aimed at providing a novel composition or method with improved efficacy, stability, or targeted delivery, conferring a significant advantage over prior arts.

Type of Patent Rights

The patent's scope primarily centers around claims that describe:

  • Compound claims: Novel chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Use claims: Therapeutic applications of compounds.
  • Method claims: Procedures for manufacturing or administering compounds.
  • Formulation claims: Specific compositions, dosage forms, or delivery systems.

Coverage and Limitations

The claims probably define the invention's boundaries with precision—covering specific chemical structures, their salts, or esters; their formulations; and their therapeutic uses. Limitations are typically embedded through scope words like "comprising," "consisting of," and specific structural or functional parameters.

This patent's scope might vary from narrow (specific compound and method) to broad (covering multiple derivatives or therapeutic indications), depending on claim drafting strategies.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Strategy

Patent claims for pharmaceuticals often follow a hierarchical structure:

  • Independent claims outline broad invention scope.
  • Dependent claims specify particular embodiments or narrow alternatives.

It is typical for JP2015193641 to include multiple independent claims focusing on different aspects—such as a new compound and its method of use.

Key Claim Elements

  • Active Ingredient: A structurally defined compound, possibly including chemical formulas with substitutions.
  • Therapeutic Use: Indication-specific claims, e.g., treating a cancer subtype.
  • Formulation: Claims covering a specific dosage form or a combination therapy.
  • Manufacturing Process: Claims on synthesis routes or purification steps.

Claim Scope and Breadth

If the patent claims a broad class of compounds, it may encompass various derivatives within a common structural core, providing extensive coverage. Conversely, narrow claims restrict the scope to a specific compound, making it potentially easier for competitors to design around, but may limit enforceability.

Claim Strength and Vulnerabilities

The robustness of the claims depends on their clarity, novelty, and inventive step:

  • Novelty: The claimed compounds or methods must differ from prior published arts or patents.
  • Inventive step: Demonstrating non-obviousness, especially if the compounds are modifications of known entities.
  • Enablement: Sufficient detail to reproduce the invention, particularly critical for chemical compounds.

Any prior arts involving similar chemical structures or therapeutic uses could challenge the patent's validity or narrow its enforceable scope.


Patent Landscape and Competition

Pre-existing Art and Prior Art Analysis

Japan's pharmaceutical patent landscape is rich, with a significant number of patents filed domestically and internationally. Prior art likely includes:

  • Existing chemical compound patents.
  • Therapeutic method patents.
  • Formulation patents.

The patent's novelty hinges on a new portion of the chemical space or unique therapeutic application not previously disclosed.

Competitors and Patent Clusters

Major pharmaceutical companies, biotech firms, and research institutions operate within the Japanese market, with patent filings focused on similar therapeutic targets or chemical classes.

Patent clustering around chemical skeletons or specific use cases creates a complex landscape:

  • Potential patent thickets may inhibit freedom to operate.
  • Freedom to operate analyses are critical to avoid infringement risk.
  • Cross-licensing opportunities could emerge if overlapping claims exist.

Geographical Patent Family and International Prospect

In addition to Japan, the applicant may have filed international patents via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), extending protection to key markets such as the US, Europe, and Asia. This strategic approach influences the patent's overall value and geographic scope.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Enforceability and Defensibility

Strong patent claims that hinge on inventive, non-obvious features provide enforceability. Given the high stakes in pharmaceuticals, patent validity often hinges on detailed prosecution history and prior art searches.

Licensing and Partnership Potential

Given its coverage, JP2015193641 can serve as a valuable IP asset for licensing deals, especially if it covers broad chemical classes or therapeutic methods. Strategic licensing can monetize the patent's value, especially in partnerships with larger firms seeking to expand their portfolio.

Market Positioning and Competitive Edge

A robust patent can create a competitive moat, allowing exclusive rights to commercialize a novel compound or therapy. This advantage supports pricing strategies, encourages R&D investments, and creates barriers for generic entrants post-patent expiry.


Conclusion

Japan Patent JP2015193641 reflects a strategic effort to protect innovative pharmaceutical compositions and methods within Japan's dynamic IP landscape. Its scope appears to encompass specific compounds, formulations, or therapeutic uses, with claims tailored to maximize protection while navigating prior art.

The patent's strength largely depends on the novelty, non-obviousness, and clarity of its claims. Competitors must conduct diligent freedom-to-operate analyses to assess infringement risks, especially given the dense patent filings in the same therapeutic domain.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of JP2015193641 likely covers novel compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods, with claim breadth critical to market exclusivity.
  • Effective claim drafting balances broad protection with enforceability, with vulnerability to prior art if claims lack novelty or inventive step.
  • The patent landscape in Japan for pharmaceuticals is dense; detailed prior art searches are vital to assess patent strength and freedom to operate.
  • Strategic patent filings, including international extensions, enhance market positioning and licensing opportunities.
  • Commercial success depends on leveraging the patent in conjunction with regulatory approvals, manufacturing capabilities, and market access strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like JP2015193641?
Such patents commonly cover novel chemical entities, their pharmaceutical uses, specific formulations, and methods of manufacturing, with scope tailored to balance protection and defensibility.

2. How does claim drafting impact the patent's enforceability?
Precise, well-structured claims define the legal scope and determine enforceability; overly broad claims risk validity challenges, while narrow claims may limit protection.

3. What are common challenges in patenting pharmaceuticals in Japan?
Challenges include prior art proliferation, demonstrating inventive step amid similar compounds, and meeting patentability standards specific to chemical and medical inventions.

4. How can competitors navigate the patent landscape around JP2015193641?
Competitors must perform detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, design around claims by exploring alternative compounds or methods, and monitor ongoing patent filings.

5. Why is international patent protection crucial for pharmaceutical inventions?
Global patent protection secures market exclusivity in multiple jurisdictions, essential for maximizing commercial potential and attracting licensing or investment.


Sources:

  1. Japan Patent Office. (2015). Publication details for JP2015193641.
  2. WIPO. (2023). Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceuticals in Japan.
  3. Kluwer Patent Blog. (2022). Strategies for Patent Claim Drafting in Pharma.
  4. Johnson & Johnson Patent Portfolio Strategy. (2021). Navigating Patent Clusters in Biotech.
  5. European Patent Office. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Japanese and International Pharmaceutical Patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.