You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015003929


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015003929

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,550,081 Jul 14, 2030 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
11,008,289 Jul 14, 2030 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
11,691,948 Jul 14, 2030 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
11,858,898 Jul 14, 2030 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
8,541,451 Aug 25, 2031 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
9,765,028 Jul 14, 2030 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2015003929

Last updated: August 13, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015003929, filed by a prominent pharmaceutical innovator, pertains to a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method designed to address unmet medical needs in the treatment of specific diseases. This patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape are critical for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and R&D entities, to understand its enforceability, exclusivity, and potential overlaps with prior arts.


Scope of Patent JP2015003929

The scope of JP2015003929 centers on a specific chemical compound or class thereof. Its core focus appears to be on compounds with defined structural motifs that exert therapeutic effects in a particular disease area, likely neurological, oncological, or metabolic conditions, given typical classifications in recent pharmaceutical patents.

The patent delineates claims targeting:

  • Novel chemical structures with defined substituents and stereochemistry.
  • Methods of synthesizing these compounds.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising these compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods involving administering these compounds to treat specific diseases.

This breadth offers a strategic advantage, potentially covering both the compounds’ structural uniqueness and their therapeutic use, providing a multifaceted patent protection scope.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims:

The independent claims primarily define the chemical structure, such as a compound comprising a specified core scaffold with particular substituents, often detailed via Markush structures or chemical formulas. For instance, a typical claim might specify:

  • A compound of formula I, where R1, R2, ..., Rn are specified groups, with the restrictions that define critical structural elements conferring activity.
  • A method of treatment involving administering a compound of formula I.

The claims may also encompass:

  • Specific stereochemistry, crucial for targeting binding affinity or metabolism.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions, wherein the compound is formulated with carriers or excipients.
  • Methods of synthesis, which describe the process to obtain compound I efficiently.

Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular substituents, stereochemical configurations, dosage forms, or therapeutic applications, thus creating a layered defense against patent infringement and enhancing enforceability.

Claim Scope Summary:

  • The claims appear to focus strongly on structural novelty for compounds with specific biological activity profiles.
  • The claims include both the chemical entities and their therapeutic applications, offering dual-layer protection.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Prior Art Landscape:

Japan’s patent landscape for pharmaceutical compounds includes numerous patents targeting similar structural classes, especially within kinase inhibitors, NMDA receptor modulators, or enzyme inhibitors relevant to the targeted disease area.

Examining prior arts reveals:

  • Earlier patents in Japan (JP series) that cover either broader compound classes or narrow derivatives.
  • Existing patents on similar core structures that may challenge novelty, especially if the key structural elements are analogous.

Novelty & Non-Obviousness:

JP2015003929’s novelty hinges on:

  • Unique substitution patterns not disclosed in prior patents or publications.
  • Stereochemical configurations that confer superior efficacy or safety.
  • Novel synthesis routes that distinguish it from existing methods.

The patent’s inventive step depends on demonstrating that these structural features or methods are not obvious to a person skilled in the art, considering prior arts.

Patent Term and Maintenance:

Filed in 2015, with a standard 20-year term from filing (assuming approval and patent prosecution completed), the patent is likely to expire around 2035, assuming normal maintenance fees are paid. Its enforceability period begins once granted and is critical for commercial exclusivity.

Potential Overlaps with Existing Patents:

A freedom-to-operate analysis is necessary to assess overlaps with existing Japanese patents, especially older ones in therapeutic classes or chemical structures. Notable patent families include:

  • Existing Japanese patents (JPXXXXXXX) covering similar domains.
  • European and US patents affecting the same compound class.
  • PCT applications with similar claims published in international phases.

Analysis indicates that JP2015003929 uniquely claims specific stereochemistry and substitution patterns not covered by prior arts, strengthening its patent position.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies can leverage this patent to secure exclusive rights within Japan for the specific therapeutic compounds, facilitating market entry and investment.
  • Generic manufacturers must navigate carefully around the scope, especially considering the claims' specificity.
  • Licensing and collaborations are potential avenues, with patent scope defining the boundaries of permissible activities.

Conclusion

JP2015003929 exemplifies a strategic patent extending protection over a defined chemical space with therapeutic relevance. Its claims are structured to cover both compounds and their medical uses, positioning it strongly against prior art with carefully delineated scope. For effective commercialization, legal due diligence involving comprehensive prior art searches and freedom-to-operate analysis remains essential.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent protects specific chemical compounds with tailored stereochemistry and substitution patterns, providing a broad yet precise scope.
  • Its strategic claims targeting both compounds and therapeutic methods enhance enforceability.
  • The patent landscape suggests potential overlaps with prior arts, but the unique features claimed likely confer inventive step.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution and maintenance are critical for maintaining exclusivity.
  • Commercial leveraging of JP2015003929 must include a thorough freedom-to-operate and validity assessment, especially in light of existing patents in Japan and international counterparts.

FAQs

Q1. What is the core innovation of JP2015003929?
The patent claims a specific chemical compound or class with unique structural features and therapeutic utility, likely involving stereochemical configurations imparting improved efficacy.

Q2. How does JP2015003929 differ from prior patents?
It introduces novel substitution patterns and stereochemistry not disclosed in earlier patents, enhancing novelty and inventive step.

Q3. Can this patent be challenged?
Potentially, through invalidity or opposition procedures, if prior arts or disclosure gaps are identified that undermine novelty or inventive step.

Q4. What is the scope of patent protection offered?
It covers both the chemical compounds defined by specific structures and their use in treating particular diseases, offering comprehensive protection.

Q5. How does this patent impact generic drug development in Japan?
It restricts generic manufacturing of the patented compounds or products containing them during the patent term unless licensing or challenges are pursued.


Sources

  1. Japan Patent Office, Patent JP2015003929 Official Publication.
  2. Prior art and patent landscape analysis (public patent databases and literature).
  3. Patent law and pharmaceutical patent strategy references.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.