You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2014193888


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2014193888

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 17, 2026 Takeda Pharms Usa DEXILANT dexlansoprazole
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 17, 2026 Takeda Pharms Usa DEXILANT SOLUTAB dexlansoprazole
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 17, 2026 Takeda Pharms Usa DEXILANT dexlansoprazole
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 17, 2026 Takeda Pharms Usa DEXILANT SOLUTAB dexlansoprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2014193888

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2014193888, titled "Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition of a Compound", pertains to a novel process for manufacturing pharmaceutical formulations containing specific active compounds. Given Japan's prominent role in pharmaceutical innovation and its sophisticated patent landscape, this patent holds significance for competitors, licensees, and patent strategists seeking to understand its breadth and positioning within the broader drug patent environment.


Scope of the Patent

JP2014193888 primarily claims a specific manufacturing process, emphasizing innovation in the preparation and formulation of a particular active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The overall scope is concentrated on:

  • Process-oriented claims: These detail the steps involved in synthesizing or formulating the pharmaceutical composition.
  • Formulation-specific claims: Some claims revolve around the end product, highlighting characteristics such as bioavailability, stability, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Compound-specific claims: While primarily process-focused, claims may encompass the use of particular compounds or intermediates involved in the process.

The patent explicitly aims to cover sufficiently novel and non-obvious manufacturing methods that improve efficiency, purity, or bioavailability of the API. The scope appears targeted but strategic, encompassing various process variations to prevent ease of design-around or circumvention.


Claims Analysis

Claims Structure Overview:

  1. Independent Claims:

    • Likely encompass the core process for producing the pharmaceutical composition.
    • Cover key steps such as chemical reactions, purification procedures, or formulation techniques.
  2. Dependent Claims:

    • Narrow the scope to specific process conditions (temperature, solvents, catalysts).
    • Claim modifications or optimizations that improve yields or reduce impurities.
    • Specific formulations or intermediate compounds involved.

Key Claim Aspects:

  • Protecting Novel Process Steps: The patent claims typically include innovations such as unique reaction sequences, improved purification methods, or specific formulation techniques.
  • Ensuring Industrial Applicability: Claims are drafted to ensure protection of practical manufacturing methods feasible on a commercial scale.
  • Avoidance of Prior Art: The claims are constructed to differentiate from existing processes, possibly emphasizing efficiency, cost reduction, or environmental benefits.

Claim vulnerabilities and considerations:

  • Given the focus on manufacturing tech, the claims' breadth can be challenged through prior art re-examination, particularly if similar processes are documented.
  • The patent's scope might be limited to particular chemical reactions or conditions — emphasizing the importance of thorough patent prosecution and potential for supplementary claims to broaden protection.

Patent Landscape in Japan for Pharmaceutical Process Patents

Japan's pharmaceutical patent landscape exhibits distinctive characteristics:

  • Strong emphasis on process patents: Japanese patent law prioritizes innovative manufacturing methods, especially regarding APIs and formulations.
  • Incremental and patent thickets: Companies often file multiple patents with slight modifications to secure comprehensive coverage.
  • Legal standards: Japan maintains strict novelty and inventive step requirements but tends to scrutinize claim clarity and enablement.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Major players: Organizations like Takeda, Astellas, and Daiichi Sankyo actively patent manufacturing processes, closely monitoring new filings to maintain market exclusivity.
  • Patent filing trends: There is a notable increase in process patents for biologics and small-molecule drugs, reflecting the strategic importance of manufacturing innovations.
  • Litigation and opposition: Patent challenges focusing on inventive step or obviousness are common in Japan, especially for process patents with narrow scope.

Patent Families and Related Applications:

  • The patent JP2014193888 is part of a broader patent family, possibly extending to jurisdictions like the US, EU, or China, to fortify global protection.
  • Related applications may focus on formulations, delivery mechanisms, or specific APIs, illustrating comprehensive patent strategies.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: Securing broad claims that encompass various process variants is crucial to fend off infringers and extend market exclusivity.
  • For Competitors: Examination of this patent’s claims can reveal potential design-around opportunities or validation of the novelty of alternative manufacturing methods.
  • For Patent Strategists: Understanding claim scope helps in prosecuting infringements, defending against invalidation, or considering licensing.

Conclusion

JP2014193888 exemplifies Japan’s strategic approach to patenting pharmaceutical manufacturing processes, emphasizing operational improvements and specific compound handling. Its scope appears centered on process claims with an intent to secure exclusive rights around novel manufacturing steps. The patent landscape in Japan underscores the necessity for comprehensive patent families and careful claim drafting to withstand legal scrutiny and maintain competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad and strategic process claims are essential in Japan’s pharmaceutical patent environment to maintain market exclusivity.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals a highly competitive environment, with frequent filings of process patents among leading Japanese pharmaceutical companies.
  • Patent scope should balance breadth with specificity to withstand invalidation while effectively covering manufacturing innovations.
  • Monitoring related applications and international filings is critical for developing comprehensive patent strategies.

FAQs

1. How does Japan patent process inventions in the pharmaceutical industry?
Japan emphasizes the inventive step and industrial applicability of manufacturing processes, often granting patents for novel, non-obvious methods that improve efficiency, yield, or safety.

2. Can a process patent in Japan cover all variations of a manufacturing method?
While broad claims are desirable, individual process steps or parameters are often narrowly claimed. Variations not encompassed by the original claims may require supplementary patents or amendments.

3. What are common vulnerabilities of process patents like JP2014193888?
They may be challenged on grounds of obviousness, insufficient disclosure, or lack of novelty if similar prior art exists, especially in related manufacturing techniques.

4. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies in Japan?
It encourages filing comprehensive patent families, fostering innovation in process engineering, and designing around existing patents to ensure freedom to operate.

5. What is the significance of family and related patents?
Family patents extend protection to multiple jurisdictions, create blocking patents, and strengthen enforcement strategies against infringers.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Office, JP2014193888 Patent Document.
  2. PatentScope, World Intellectual Property Organization.
  3. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Guidelines on Patentability and Novelty.
  4. Patent Landscape Reports, Asian-Pacific Pharmaceutical Patents Analysis.
  5. Industry-specific patent prosecution and litigation case studies in Japan.

Note: This analysis synthesizes available patent information and general patent landscape trends to provide an insightful overview of JP2014193888. For specific legal advice or detailed patent prosecution strategies, consultation with a registered patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.