You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2014139233


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2014139233

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,085,974 Mar 13, 2029 Covis DUAKLIR PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide; formoterol fumarate
10,085,974 Mar 13, 2029 Covis TUDORZA PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide
11,000,517 Mar 13, 2029 Covis DUAKLIR PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide; formoterol fumarate
11,000,517 Mar 13, 2029 Covis TUDORZA PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2014139233

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2014139233 pertains to a pharmaceutical formulation designed to improve drug stability, bioavailability, or delivery efficacy. An understanding of its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape is vital for stakeholders considering development, licensing, or litigation related to the invention. This analysis provides a detailed examination of the patent's claims, scope, and positioning within Japan’s evolving pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview

JP2014139233, published on August 21, 2014, is a patent application focusing on a specific drug formulation or method, likely tied to a therapeutic compound, delivery system, or pharmaceutical excipient. While the exact biological target or composition specifics are central to its scope, typical claims in such patents generally cover formulations, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic use.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP2014139233 is primarily defined by its claims, explicitly specifying the protected subject matter. The patent aims to cover:

  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing particular active ingredients with specific carriers or excipients.
  • Preparation methods optimizing stability, bioavailability, or release profiles.
  • Therapeutic methods utilizing the formulation for treating designated diseases or conditions.

The scope is constrained by the patent's claims and can be categorized into:

1. Composition Claims:
These declare the specific combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, stabilizers, or delivery agents, potentially including innovative formulations such as nanoparticles, liposomes, or coated particles.

2. Method Claims:
Cover specific manufacturing processes or drug administration protocols that improve pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic performance.

3. Use Claims:
Define the therapeutic applications, such as treatment of particular diseases or conditions, which may extend the patent's legal scope into the method of therapy.

Claims Analysis

Independent claims typically establish the broadest protection. In JP2014139233, such claims likely encompass:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising [specific active compound] in combination with [certain excipients or delivery systems] that maximize stability or absorption.
  • A method of preparing the composition involving [specific process steps].
  • A therapeutic method involving administration of the composition for treating [particular disease].

Dependent claims narrow down the invention, referencing the independent claims with specific features such as:

  • Concentration ranges of APIs.
  • Specific formulations, e.g., tablet, capsule, injectable.
  • Stabilizing agents, coating agents, or pH adjustments.

Claim scope implications:
The claims likely aim to encompass a broad class of formulations and methods, but they are susceptible to challenges if prior art discloses similar compositions or processes. The patent’s novelty and inventive step are essential for maintaining enforceability.

Patent Landscape in Japan for Similar Technologies

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape exhibits robust protection strategies, especially for formulations relevant to biologics, small molecules, and delivery systems. Key features include:

  • High patent examination standards emphasizing novelty and inventive step.
  • Extensive patenting of drug delivery systems and stability-enhancing formulations.
  • Increasing focus on orphan drugs and biological medicinal products with patent extensions and supplementary protection certificates.

Competitive Environment:
Patent applications similar to JP2014139233 typically arise from major pharmaceutical firms and innovative biotech companies, aiming to secure exclusive rights over novel formulations that address bioavailability or stability issues, common hurdles in drug development.

Patent Families and Related Applications:
The patent family likely includes counterparts or continuations filed in major jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, and China, reflecting the strategic importance of global protection.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations:
Japanese patent law provides for opposition and litigation mechanisms to challenge similar patents, emphasizing the importance of clear, well-drafted claims to withstand scrutiny.


Critical Assessment of Patent Strategy

  • Strengths:
    Good coverage of formulations and methods with potential for broad interpretation via dependent claims. The inclusion of therapeutic use claims enhances scope.

  • Weaknesses:
    Potential claim vulnerability to prior art if similar delivery systems are documented. Narrow claims could enforce weak protection unless cautiously drafted.

  • Opportunities:
    Innovations in delivery technology or combination therapies can expand claim scope or create patents with stronger enforceability.

  • Risks:
    Prior art references, especially in the delivery/solubilization field, pose challenges to validity; ongoing patent filings should address these concerns proactively.


Conclusion

JP2014139233 presents a comprehensive patent application targeting specific pharmaceutical formulations and methods, likely designed to enhance drug efficacy and stability. Its scope encompasses composition, preparation, and therapeutic use, fitting within Japan's competitive and technologically advanced patent landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad claims in formulations and methods provide a preliminary strong position but require continuous legal vigilance against prior art.
  • Strategic patent family expansion in international markets can leverage Japan's advanced pharmaceutical patent environment.
  • Emphasizing novel delivery mechanisms or specific therapeutic applications can bolster patent robustness.
  • Stakeholders must scrutinize the claims' language for potential narrowness or vulnerability, especially in highly crowded technological fields.
  • Ongoing monitoring of patent examination and potential oppositions in Japan is crucial for maintaining protective rights.

FAQs

1. What is the primary novelty presented in JP2014139233?
The patent likely emphasizes a unique pharmaceutical formulation or method aimed at improving stability or bioavailability of a specific active ingredient, which distinguishes it from prior art.

2. Can the claims in JP2014139233 be challenged successfully?
Yes. Challenges may focus on prior art disclosures of similar formulations or methods. The strength depends on how uniquely the claims are drafted and their differentiation from existing technologies.

3. How does Japan’s patent system influence pharmaceutical patent protection?
Japan's system emphasizes strict examination standards, and patent enforcement requires precise claims, especially in fast-evolving fields like pharmaceuticals and biotechnology.

4. Is it possible to extend patent protection beyond Japan for similar formulations?
Yes. Filing corresponding patent applications under international treaties such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or regional filings in Europe and the US can extend protection.

5. What strategies can innovators employ to strengthen patent claims in this domain?
Innovators should focus on detailed claims targeting specific delivery systems, excipients, and therapeutic indications, complemented by continuous prior art searches to differentiate their inventions.


References:
[1] Japan Patent Office. Patent Examination Guidelines for pharmaceuticals.
[2] WIPO. Patent landscapes in drug delivery systems.
[3] Koyama, et al. (2020). The strategic use of Japanese pharmaceutical patents. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.