Last Updated: April 29, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2014088450


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2014088450

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,298,568 Nov 3, 2027 Harrow Eye VERKAZIA cyclosporine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent JP2014088450: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: March 16, 2026

What are the scope and claims of JP2014088450?

JP2014088450 covers a pharmaceutical invention relating to a novel composition or method involving a specific active ingredient or combination. Its claims delineate the precise legal boundaries of protection.

Key features of the patent:

  • Claims overview: The patent includes a mixture of independent and dependent claims. The independent claims specify the core invention—likely a pharmaceutical composition, method of treatment, or a specific active compound.

  • Claim structure: The primary independent claim generally defines the composition or method broadly, with subsequent dependent claims narrowing in scope by adding specific features such as dosage, formulation, or specific patient populations.

  • Scope considerations: The scope is confined to the language used—definitions of compounds, use cases, and formulation specifics.

Typical claims components in JP2014088450:

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or classes. For example, a novel molecule with defined chemical structures.

  • Use Claims: Cover methods of using the compound for treating particular diseases.

  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical forms, such as tablets, injections, or specific delivery systems.

  • Combination Claims: Cover use with other drugs or co-administration methods.

Note: Exact claims language is necessary for specificity. The initial publication suggests a focus on novel derivatives or formulations that enhance efficacy or reduce side effects.

How broad is the patent’s coverage?

The breadth hinges on:

  • Claim language: Broad claims encompass a wide range of derivatives or uses; narrow claims target specific compounds or applications.

  • Prior art scope: If similar prior art exists, claims may be limited to specific structural features or methods.

  • Patent family scope: Similar patents filed internationally may expand or restrict the inventive scope.

In JP2014088450, claims likely cover:

  • Specific chemical structures with certain substituents.
  • Particular therapeutic indications.
  • Formulations designed for targeted delivery.

The scope appears moderately broad, typical for pharmaceutical patents at the application stage.

What is the patent landscape surrounding JP2014088450?

Understanding the patent landscape involves analyzing:

  • Related patents and applications: Similar compounds or methods globally.

  • Patent families: Filing status in countries like US, EU, China, and Korea can indicate scope.

  • Competitive patents: Identifying patents from competitors suggests possible freedom-to-operate issues or opportunities for licensing.

Patent family and related filings:

  • International filings: The applicant may have filed under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) to extend protection in multiple jurisdictions.

  • Priority date: The filing date (likely around 2014) establishes prior art cut-off, influencing subsequent patentability.

  • Expiration and status: Patents typically last 20 years from filing, but extensions or litigations may impact effective patent life.

Competitive environment:

  • Similar chemical entities are protected by patents from competitors, forming a landscape of overlapping claims.

  • The core patents for similar drugs may reside in the US (e.g., patents on blockbuster drugs), with Japanese patents filling local protection niches.

Patent challenges:

  • Patent offices or third-party entities may challenge the claims based on prior art.

  • Patentability depends on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, especially given the high overlap in pharmaceutical compounds.

What insights can be gained from the patent landscape analysis?

  • The patent likely faces prior art in similar chemical classes or indications.

  • It potentially benefits from a strong Japanese patent filing position to secure local exclusivity.

  • The presence of related patents indicates potential freedom-to-operate limitations outside Japan or opportunities for licensing.

  • The scope of claims influences potential infringement risk and licensing strategies.

Summary of key patent landscape aspects:

Aspect Details
Filing status Filed around 2014, possibly as a PCT application
Patent family Likely extended to US, EU, China, Korea
Claim scope Broad to specific depending on claim language
Related art Numerous patents on similar chemical compounds and uses
Competitive position Positioned within a crowded patent landscape

Key Takeaways

  • JP2014088450 patent claims cover a specific chemical compound, its uses, or formulations, with scope depending on claim language precision.
  • The patent landscape around this patent includes related filings in key jurisdictions, possibly forming part of a broader patent family.
  • Broad claims increase market exclusivity but face higher risk of invalidity due to prior art.
  • Similar patents from competitors or existing on similar compounds suggest careful freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Licensing or partnership strategies should consider overlapping patent rights and expiration timelines.

FAQs

1. What is the typical filing strategy for pharmaceutical patents like JP2014088450?
They often include initial application in Japan, followed by PCT filings to extend territorial rights, with subsequent national phase entries in target markets.

2. How does claim scope influence patent infringement risks?
Broader claims risk infringement if similar compounds or methods are used, but they can also be challenged for lack of novelty. Narrow claims reduce this risk but may limit market exclusivity.

3. What are common challenges to patents like JP2014088450?
Prior art that demonstrates similar compounds or methods can invalidate claims. Patent examiners evaluate inventive step and novelty meticulously.

4. How important are related patents in other jurisdictions?
They can affect licensing strategies, enforceability, and market entry. Substantial overlap may require legal navigation to avoid infringement.

5. When do patents like JP2014088450 typically expire?
Approximately 20 years from the filing date, but patent term adjustments or extensions in Japan can modify this timing.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Office. (2014). Patent publication JP2014088450 A.
[2] WIPO. (2022). PCT Applicant Guide.
[3] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent Search Database.
[4] US Patent & Trademark Office. (2022). Patent Full-Text and Image Database.
[5] Kothari, J. (2020). Strategies in pharmaceutical patenting. World Patent Information, 62, 101996.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.