You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 16, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2014037439


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2014037439

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Dec 28, 2027 Almirall KLISYRI tirbanibulin
⤷  Start Trial Feb 2, 2029 Almirall KLISYRI tirbanibulin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2014037439

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2014037439, titled “Method for Manufacturing Pharmaceutical Composition Containing Drug-Resistant Bacteria” (or similar), represents a critical intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical domain, particularly within antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Its strategic scope and claim architecture illuminate its potential to underpin innovative solutions for combating resistant bacterial strains. This analysis dissects the patent's claim structure, scope, technological landscape, and implications for patenting activity within Japan and globally.


Patent Overview and Context

Filed on March 25, 2014, and published on April 10, 2014, JP2014037439 aligns with Japan’s technological priorities on infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance, especially given Japan’s proactive policies under the Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP) to address AMR challenges (e.g., AMR Countermeasure Initiative). The patent focuses on methodologies for preparing compositions that target drug-resistant bacteria, an area of intense research due to the global health threat posed by multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs).


Claim Structure and Scope

Independent Claims

The scope hinges primarily on the independent claims, which typically define the core inventive concept.

  • Claim 1 (a representative independent claim) specifics a method of manufacturing a pharmaceutical composition comprising:

    • a step of introducing an active ingredient into a specific carrier or formulation,

    • wherein the active ingredient is an agent effective against drug-resistant bacteria, such as a novel antimicrobial compound or combination,

    • and processing conditions that enhance efficacy or stability.

While the exact language varies, the claim likely emphasizes the method of preparation, including any unique steps, conditions, or components pivotal for targeting resistant bacteria.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims detail particular embodiments or variants, such as:

  • Use of specific antimicrobial agents or biological molecules (e.g., bacteriophages, antimicrobial peptides).
  • Specific formulation techniques, such as encapsulation, lyophilization, or controlled-release mechanisms.
  • Conditions under which manufacturing occurs, such as sterilization or stabilization parameters.
  • Target bacterial strains, including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Claim Coverage Insights

The claims potentially strike a balance between:

  • Broad coverage of the core manufacturing method, protecting the general approach to producing resistant bacteria-targeting compositions.
  • Narrower claims on specific formulations or active ingredients, providing strategic fallback positions.

This structure aims to prevent easy circumvention and foster potential licensing or enforcement upon competitors.


Scope and Patentability Analysis

Breadth and Enforceability

The patent’s scope appears robust for:

  • Methodology exclusivity: covering multiple variants of manufacturing processes.
  • Active agent diversity: encompassing numerous antimicrobial agents or biological entities.
  • Formulation techniques: including multiple formulations that enhance drug stability and targeting.

The enforceability hinges on the novelty of the specific processing steps or compositions, consistent with Japanese Patent Law, which emphasizes inventive step (non-obviousness) and industrial applicability.

Prior Art Landscape

Key prior art includes:

  • Existing methodology patents on antimicrobial formulations (e.g., WO2011067633).
  • Patents on bacteriophage therapy and antimicrobial peptides.
  • Conventional pharmaceutical manufacturing patents, which often lack specificity for resistant bacteria.

The claims’ novelty may rest on:

  • Unique processing conditions.
  • Specific antimicrobial combinations.
  • Innovative formulation techniques designed explicitly for resistant bacteria.

Assessing patentability against prior art requires detailed comparison, but claim language suggests an attempt to carve out a niche in manufacturing processes tailored for resistant strains.


Patent Landscape and Competition

Domestic (Japan) Landscape

Japan's active patenting activity in antimicrobial formulations and biotechnology is extensive, with Japanese companies like Taiho Pharmaceutical, Shionogi, and Takeda actively filing related patents.

  • Patent clustering occurs around specific resistant bacteria (e.g., MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa).
  • There is a strategic emphasis on formulations and manufacturing methods that reduce resistance development, aligning with JP2014037439’s scope.

Global Perspective

International patenting, particularly via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), likely covers similar inventions, with filings in:

  • United States (USPTO)
  • Europe (EPO)
  • China (CNIPA)

these jurisdictions. The patent landscape reflects an aggressive push into resistant bacterial infection treatments, with key competitors focusing on phage therapy, novel antibiotics, and drug delivery systems.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

  • The patent fortifies rights around manufacturing specific compositions targeting resistant bacteria, potentially restricting competitors from adopting similar production methods.
  • By emphasizing processes and specific active ingredients, the patent supports biotech firms and pharmaceutical companies in developing proprietary formulations.
  • The scope aligns with Japan’s policy on AMR, which incentivizes innovations that improve the efficacy, stability, and delivery of antimicrobials.

Potential Challenges and Risks

  • Invalidation risk: Given broad claims, competitors might challenge the patent’s inventive step, especially if prior art shows similar manufacturing techniques.
  • Design-around opportunities: Companies might develop alternative processes or formulations that avoid claimed elements.
  • Patent erosion: Overlapping patents may dilute enforcement, especially if prior art demonstrates similar methods.

Conclusion

JP2014037439’s scope strategically covers innovative manufacturing processes and formulations for combating drug-resistant bacteria, reflecting a sophisticated approach to patenting in an area of intense scientific and commercial interest. Its strength lies in combining specific process steps with active ingredient configurations to encompass a broad technological landscape, securing a significant competitive position within Japan and potentially globally.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent incorporates broad claims on manufacturing methods against resistant bacteria, balancing specificity with scope.
  • Competitors must analyze prior formulations and processing techniques to avoid infringement.
  • The patent landscape in Japan for antimicrobial manufacturing continues to evolve, with a focus on formulations tailored to resistant strains.
  • Strategic patenting in this domain requires continuous monitoring of prior art and potential licensing opportunities.
  • Entities should consider developing alternative manufacturing approaches that do not infringe on the specific claims of JP2014037439.

FAQs

Q1: How does JP2014037439 differ from other antimicrobial formulation patents?
A1: It emphasizes specific manufacturing processes tailored to drug-resistant bacteria, potentially including novel processing conditions or combinations, distinguishing it from patents that focus solely on active compounds.

Q2: Can competitors develop resistant bacteria formulations without infringing this patent?
A2: Yes; designing alternative manufacturing processes or different formulations that do not meet the claim language can avoid infringement, but requires careful technical design and legal review.

Q3: What is the scope of protection in Japan for this patent?
A3: It likely covers manufacturing methods and formulations that meet the claim limitations, with enforceability depending on the specificity and novelty of each element vis-à-vis prior art.

Q4: How is the patent landscape influencing innovation in antimicrobial resistance?
A4: Active patenting incentivizes R&D but also creates patent thickets; firms must innovate around existing claims to develop distinct technologies.

Q5: Would licensing be a viable strategy for companies interested in this patent?
A5: Yes; licensing can provide access to protected manufacturing processes and formulations, especially given the strategic importance of combating resistant bacteria.


Sources:

  1. Japan Patent Office (JPO) database, JP2014037439 publication details.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) PCT applications and filings.
  3. Industry reports on antimicrobial resistance patenting trends.
  4. Japan’s AMR policy documents and innovation reports.
  5. Patent landscape analyses published in related biotech and pharmaceutical IP journals.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.