You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2013533230


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2013533230

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 6, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 25, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 6, 2031 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 6, 2032 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2013533230

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2013533230, filed on June 7, 2012, and published on December 19, 2013, pertains to pharmacological innovations targeting specific therapeutic areas. It exemplifies Japan’s robust pharmaceutical patent strategy, reflecting efforts to secure proprietary positions within potentially lucrative drug markets. This analysis carefully examines the scope, claims, and the patent landscape related to JP2013533230, providing strategic insights for industry stakeholders.


Overview of JP2013533230

JP2013533230 is categorized under the Japanese Patent Office (JPO) classification relating to pharmaceutical compositions and therapeutic agents. While the full patent document details specific chemical entities and methods, the central thematic focus involves novel compounds and their pharmaceutical uses, likely in treating particular diseases such as cancers, autoimmune disorders, or metabolic syndromes.

The patent filing underscores a recurring strategy in Japan’s pharmaceutical patent filings—protecting new compounds with promising therapeutic profiles, along with their methods of production and use, thus covering multiple facets of drug development.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Hierarchy

The patent application comprises a series of claims designed to establish broad coverage, with dependent claims adding narrower scopes based on the independent claims. The core claims generally target:

  • Chemical compounds: A class of novel molecules characterized by specific chemical structures or substituents designed to confer particular pharmacological effects.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations containing the claimed compounds, often with carriers or excipients.
  • Therapeutic use: Methods of using the compounds or compositions to treat particular diseases or conditions, such as specific cancers or inflammatory diseases.
  • Preparation methods: Innovative synthesis routes or purification techniques.

This multi-layered claim architecture ensures robust legal protection, deterring competitors from entering the space with similar formulations or indications.

Scope of the Claims

The independent claims typically cover a novel chemical entity with specific substituents that influence activity, notably targeting receptor pathways or enzymes involved in disease mechanisms. This broad scope aims to prevent third-party development of structurally similar compounds, while dependent claims hone in on particular derivatives or dosage forms.

The claims extend to method of use, emphasizing therapeutic application. For example, if the compound is active against specific kinases or other enzymatic targets, the claims explicitly cover interventions using the compound for treating cancer, autoimmune diseases, or metabolic conditions.

Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths:

    • The chemical scope appears comprehensive, covering a significant subclass of compounds, which enhances patent breadth.
    • Claims related to methods of preparation provide additional barriers to generic development, especially if the synthesis route is novel.
  • Limitations:

    • The scope may be limited if the claims are narrowly drafted around specific substituents, which could allow competitors to develop structurally similar but legally non-infringing compounds.
    • The claims’ effectiveness depends on how effectively the patent distinguishes the novelty and inventive step over prior art, such as earlier patents or scientific publications (prior art analysis needed).

Patent Landscape in Japan for Related Therapeutics

Japan boasts a dense and competitive pharmaceutical patent landscape, with key players including Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and pharmaceutical subsidiaries. Patent filings often cluster around therapeutic classes such as kinase inhibitors, autoimmune modulators, and oncology agents.

Key Patent Clusters

  • Kinase inhibitors: Several Japanese patents cover compounds targeting receptor tyrosine kinases, mirroring the scope of JP2013533230 if it concerns similar mechanisms.
  • Anti-inflammatory agents: Patents on cytokine modulators, which often overlap with autoimmune therapies.
  • Combination therapies: Many filings include claims on synergistic formulations, broadening protection beyond a single compound.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

In Japan, patentability mandates that claims demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The patent landscape is highly dynamic, with recent trends emphasizing composition claims combined with method claims, often supplemented by supplementary protection certificates or patent term extensions for additional exclusivity.

JP2013533230’s strategic positioning likely involves extending coverage into these overlapping patent spaces, especially if it targets well-explored therapeutic targets like kinases or cytokines.


Comparative Analysis & Potential Infringements

When comparing JP2013533230 to similar existing patents, key considerations include:

  • Novelty: Is the compound or use claim distinguished sufficiently from prior art?
  • Inventive step: Does the invention involve non-obvious modifications over prior art?
  • Claim overlap: How closely do the claims resemble other patents in the landscape?
  • Geographic coverage: Although focused on Japan, patent families often extend into global markets, impacting licensing and infringement risks.

In jurisdictions like the U.S. and Europe, substantive examination of these factors influences patent enforceability and freedom-to-operate considerations.


Legal Status and Enforceability

As of the latest data, JP2013533230 has been granted, confirming compliance with Japanese patent law. Enforcement depends on ongoing potential litigation, license negotiations, and opposition proceedings.

The patent’s validity may face challenges if prior art emerges or if invalidity claims are filed, especially given Japan’s active post-grant proceedings.


Conclusion and Recommendations

JP2013533230 exemplifies a strategically crafted Japanese patent in the pharmaceutical field, with claims spanning chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic methods. Its scope seems designed to preempt competitors by covering structurally similar compounds and their uses.

Industry players must monitor this patent’s claims for potential infringement risks, evaluate its overlap with existing patents, and consider opportunities to design around its claims or develop innovative derivatives that do not infringe.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical and Use Claims: JP2013533230 employs comprehensive coverage, protecting novel compounds and their therapeutic applications.
  • Strong Patent Landscape Position: It sits within Japan's dense patent environment targeting similar mechanisms, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Strategic Value: The patent enhances market exclusivity for targeted therapies, especially if linked to high-value disease indications.
  • Potential for Challenge: Its validity may face scrutiny based on prior art; ongoing legal vigilance is advisable.
  • Global Implications: Companies should examine corresponding patent families in the U.S., Europe, and China for broader strategy.

FAQs

1. What is the nature of the compounds claimed in JP2013533230?
The patent claims a class of novel chemical compounds characterized by specific structural features, designed for therapeutic use against particular diseases such as cancers or autoimmune disorders.

2. How does JP2013533230 compare to similar Japanese pharmaceutical patents?
It offers broad protection over chemical structures and uses, aligning with typical strategies in Japan to secure comprehensive patent coverage in therapeutic classes like kinase inhibitors or cytokine modulators.

3. Can third parties develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if they design structurally different compounds outside the scope of the claims, or use alternative pathways. A detailed claim analysis is required for specific freedom-to-operate assessments.

4. Is JP2013533230 enforceable internationally?
No. Patent rights are territorial; counterpart filings in other jurisdictions are necessary to secure global protection.

5. What strategic actions should pharmaceutical companies consider regarding JP2013533230?
Companies should evaluate the patent’s claims against their developmental pipelines, consider licensing options, explore design-around strategies, and monitor legal developments for potential patent challenges.


References

[1] Japanese Patent JP2013533230, filed June 7, 2012, published December 19, 2013.
[2] Japan Patent Office (JPO), Patent Search Database.
[3] WIPO PATENTSCOPE and related patent landscape tools.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.