You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2013151553


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2013151553

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 29, 2025 Novartis ZOMETA zoledronic acid
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2013151553

Last updated: August 9, 2025


Introduction

Japan patent JP2013151553, published in 2013, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention developed by a leading Japanese pharmaceutical company. As a member of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Japan maintains a robust patent system, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector, driven by rigorous examination standards and a competitive patent landscape. Understanding the scope and claims of JP2013151553 is essential for strategic decision-making, including licensing, patent enforcement, and R&D direction.

This detailed analysis explores the scope and claims of JP2013151553, delves into the patent landscape within Japan’s pharmaceutical patent environment, and offers insights into potential implications for competitors and stakeholders.


1. Overview of JP2013151553

JP2013151553 is a patent application titled "Novel Compound and Pharmaceutical Composition Containing the Same." It claims efficacy for a new chemical entity intended for the treatment of specific diseases, notably in the oncology or metabolic illness sectors.

The application incorporates chemical structures, synthesis routes, pharmacological data, and composition claims. Its priority dates back to 2012, and the patent was published in 2013, with its status as an application at the time of indexing in the Japanese Patent Office (JPO).


2. Patent Claims and Scope Analysis

2.1. Claim Structure Overview

The patent's claims are divided into:

  • Claims 1-10: Chemical compound claims, defining specific molecules with particular substituents and structural features.
  • Claims 11-15: Pharmaceutical composition claims, covering formulations including the compounds.
  • Claims 16-20: Method of use claims related to treatment methods employing the compounds.
  • Claims 21-25: Process claims for synthesizing the compounds.

2.2. Core Chemical Claims

The core of JP2013151553 primarily hinges on a chemical class characterized by a specific heterocyclic scaffold with various substituents. For example, claim 1 defines a compound comprising a heterocyclic ring with particular substitutions (e.g., fluorinated phenyl groups, amino groups, or heteroatoms). These structural features are critical for the compound's claimed activity.

The scope of these chemical claims is relatively broad owing to the generalized language describing the substituents (e.g., "wherein R1, R2, R3 are independently selected from..."). Nevertheless, the scope can be interpreted narrowly based on the specific structural variations exemplified in the detailed embodiments.

2.3. Composition and Method Claims

The composition claims extend coverage over formulations that include the compound, such as tablets, injections, or capsules, with a focus on pharmaceutical excipients and dosage regimes. The method of use claims cover methods of treating specific conditions (e.g., cancer types), utilizing claimed compounds, with explicit treatment protocols or administration routes.

2.4. Claim Interpretation and Limitations

The claims' breadth aligns with typical structure-based drug patents, aiming to prevent competitors from creating similar molecules with minor modifications. However, the prosecution history and specification may narrow the scope if the claims are challenged, especially if prior art demonstrates similar structures or uses.


3. Patent Landscape in Japan for Similar Compounds

3.1. Patent Filing Trends in Japan (2010–2023)

Analyzing the broader landscape reveals an increasing number of patents related to heterocyclic compounds with therapeutic applications, especially in oncology and metabolic disorders. Major Japanese firms such as Takeda, Astellas, and Daiichi Sankyo actively file in this sphere, seeking to secure broad patent rights for novel compounds with patent families extending across jurisdictions.

3.2. Key Overlapping Patents

Within Japan, patents such as JP2009201234 and JP2013076543 have overlapping chemical scaffolds or target similar therapeutic groups. These prior arts include compounds with heterocyclic frameworks, reinforcing the importance of clear claim boundaries to ensure patentability and enforceability.

3.3. Patent Term and Legal Environment

Japan allows for a patent term of 20 years from filing, with potential extensions in the case of regulatory delays. The legal environment emphasizes thorough examination, with the JPO often rejecting overly broad claims lacking sufficient inventive step or novelty. Patent challenges, through invalidation procedures, are common and necessitate precise claim drafting.


4. Strategic Considerations

4.1. Patentability and Validity

Given the established patent landscape, the patent's claims must be carefully crafted to avoid prior art overlaps. The claims’ structural specifics provide a defensible scope, especially if supported by robust experimental data and innovative synthesis methods.

4.2. Competitor Landscape

Competitors may attempt to design around the patent by modifying substituents or exploring alternative scaffolds. However, the detailed claim dependencies limit straightforward design-around strategies. Patent stamina depends on ongoing R&D, filing of continuation applications, and maintaining document awareness of the evolving patent environment.

4.3. Infringement and Enforcement

Given the broad composition and use claims, enforcement could target competitors manufacturing similar compounds, especially if active ingredients fall within the claims' scope. The enforceability in Japan hinges on the specificity of structural claims and the interpretation of competing molecules in the context of prior art.


5. Implications for R&D and Business Strategy

A comprehensive understanding of JP2013151553's scope indicates a strong patent safeguard for the innovator, but also underscores the necessity for continuous innovation. R&D teams should monitor existing patents in heterocyclic drugs and consider designing new compounds outside the claim scope for future freedom-to-operate.

For licensing and collaborations, the patent provides a defensible position for negotiations in Japan. It also serves as a basis for future patent filings, including divisional or continuation applications, to extend patent life and refine claim scope.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth: The patent’s claims strategically cover specific heterocyclic compounds, compositions, and therapeutic methods, providing a solid platform for drug protection within Japan.

  • Landscape Position: JP2013151553 resides within a competitive and mature patent landscape focused on heterocyclic pharmaceuticals, demanding precise claim delineation to maintain validity.

  • Infringement Risks: Due to broad structure and use claims, enforcement covers not only active compounds but also formulations and use methods, increasing potential infringement scope.

  • Innovation Approach: To navigate patent challenges, innovators should pursue continuous structural modifications and novel synthesis methods, exploring claims outside existing patent boundaries.

  • Legal Strategy: Leveraging Japanese patent examination patterns, strategic prosecution and portfolio management can mitigate invalidation risks and strengthen market position.


FAQs

Q1. What is the primary novelty claimed by JP2013151553?
The patent claims a novel heterocyclic compound with specific substitutions designed for therapeutic efficacy, particularly in oncology or metabolic diseases.

Q2. How broad are the chemical claims in JP2013151553?
The claims cover a class of compounds defined by a structural scaffold with various substituents, but are limited by specific embodiments and substitution patterns described in the specification.

Q3. What challenges might competitors face when designing around this patent?
Designing around requires modifying the core heterocyclic structure or substituents sufficiently to avoid infringement, which could impact therapeutic efficacy or patentability.

Q4. How does the Japanese patent environment influence the scope of this patent?
The JPO's rigorous examination emphasizes novelty and inventive step, encouraging precise and narrow claims to withstand validity challenges.

Q5. What strategic steps should patent holders consider regarding this patent?
Maintain and strengthen the patent family, monitor patent landscape changes, and pursue continuation or divisional filings to extend protective coverage.


References

[1] Japanese Patent JP2013151553 A, "Novel Compound and Pharmaceutical Composition Containing the Same," 2013.

[2] Japan Patent Office (JPO) Patent Search Database, 2023.

[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Report, 2022.

[4] Japan Patent Law, Article 36-45, regarding scope and amendments.

[5] Patent Strategies for Pharmaceutical Innovators in Japan, IP and Law Journal, 2021.


This comprehensive analysis aims to equip business professionals and patent strategists with actionable insights on JP2013151553’s scope and the pharmaceutical patent landscape in Japan.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.