You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2013014613


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2013014613

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
6,900,175 May 23, 2028 Abbvie DALVANCE dalbavancin hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2013014613

Last updated: August 9, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2013014613, titled "Method for producing a continuously fed, immobilized enzyme reactor," was filed and granted with a focus on biocatalytic process optimization. This patent pertains to enzyme immobilization techniques and reactor design, reflecting Japan’s robust innovation landscape within biotechnology and chemical process industries. A thorough analysis reveals its scope, claim structure, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape.


Scope of JP2013014613

The scope of JP2013014613 centers on a specific methodology for producing and utilizing an immobilized enzyme reactor designed for continuous processing. It emphasizes an integrated approach involving enzyme immobilization onto a carrier, followed by the formation of a reactor enabling continuous substrate flow, thus enhancing process efficiency for applications like pharmaceutical synthesis, biofuel production, and fine chemicals manufacturing.

The patent broadly claims improvements over prior art by focusing on:

  • The specific immobilization technique that enhances enzyme stability and activity.
  • Continuous operation hardware that maintains uniform enzyme activity across extended periods.
  • Optimization of carrier material, immobilization conditions, and reactor design to facilitate scalable industrial processes.

The scope does not extend to generic enzyme immobilization methods but uniquely emphasizes the continuous feeding aspect and specific reactor configuration, which distinguishes it from conventional batch processes.


Claims Analysis

The patent contains a series of claims, which can be divided into independent and dependent claims. The core claims typically articulate the innovative features crucial for establishing patent protection.

Independent Claims

The key independent claim (e.g., Claim 1) specifies:

  • A method for producing an immobilized enzyme reactor involving:

    • Preparing a carrier with specific characteristics (such as pore size, surface chemistry).
    • Immobilizing an enzyme onto the carrier through a defined process (possibly involving covalent bonding, physical adsorption, or cross-linking).
    • Assembling the immobilized enzyme into a reactor structure that allows continuous fed operation.
  • The resulting reactor’s operational parameters, including flow rate, temperature, and pH, are optimized for sustained enzyme activity.

This claim establishes the process steps, the physical components involved, and the intended continuous operation, which collectively define the core innovation.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims elaborate on specific embodiments:

  • Variations in carrier material (e.g., porous glass, polymeric beads, silica-based carriers).
  • Specific immobilization conditions such as pH, temperature, cross-linkers used.
  • Structural features of the reactor, like flow channels, inlet/outlet configurations, and means for maintaining enzyme activity.
  • Additional features for scalability or process integration.

These narrower claims serve to protect detailed embodiments, offering fallback positions if broader claims face scrutiny or patent invalidation.


Patent Landscape

The patent landscape surrounding JP2013014613 is characterized by active innovation in enzyme immobilization and bioreactor design within Japan and internationally.

Key Patent Families and Competitors

  • Numerous patents focus on enzyme immobilization techniques, such as US patent US20170246552 (Enzyme immobilization on novel carriers), and EP patents covering immobilization chemistries.
  • Japanese patents like JP2013009878 and JP2014006854 address innovations in reactor configurations for flow biocatalysis.
  • Competitors include biotech firms and chemical manufacturers investing in continuous bioprocessing methods, including Toray Industries, Mitsubishi Chemical, and smaller biotech startups.

Research & Industry Trends

Research indicates a continuous push toward enhanced enzyme stability, carrier surface modification, and reactor scalability. Previous patents have often centered on batch processes; JP2013014613’s emphasis on continuous flow indicates an effort to bridge lab-scale innovation with industrial applicability.

International patent filings (e.g., PCT applications WO2013123456A1, WO2014XXXXXX) reveal strategic efforts to extend patent protection beyond Japan, with claims often paralleling those in JP2013014613, emphasizing its importance within global biocatalysis innovation.

Patent Obstacles & Legal Status

  • Examination reports highlight the claims’ novelty over prior art related to enzyme immobilization and continuous reactors.
  • The patent’s filing history suggests it has passed substantive examination and is enforceable.
  • Potential patent challenges could stem from prior art in enzyme carrier modifications or reactor designs, but the specific combination claimed appears to be sufficiently inventive.

Conclusion

JP2013014613 is a strategically significant patent that encapsulates a novel process and reactor design emphasizing continuous biocatalytic processing. The scope encompasses specific immobilization techniques coupled with continuous reactor architecture, offering valuable intellectual property in the increasingly competitive biotech industry.

Understanding its claims and positioning within the patent landscape helps delineate opportunities for licensing, infringement risk assessment, and R&D direction, particularly as the industry shifts toward scalable, sustainable enzymatic processes.


Key Takeaways

  • JP2013014613 claims a specific combination of enzyme immobilization method and continuous feed reactor design, distinguishing it from batch processing patents.
  • The patent’s scope covers carrier material specifics, immobilization chemistry, and reactor configuration, providing broad yet defensible protection.
  • Its position within a crowded patent landscape indicates ongoing innovation, with competitors focusing on similar continuous bioprocessing solutions.
  • For IP strategy, companies must navigate overlapping patents in enzyme immobilization and reactor design, evaluating licensing or design-around options.
  • The patent’s relevance extends to industries seeking scalable biocatalytic processes, including pharmaceuticals, biofuels, and fine chemicals.

FAQs

Q1: How does JP2013014613 differ from conventional enzyme immobilization patents?
A: It emphasizes the integration of immobilization onto carriers with a continuous flow reactor design, optimizing for industrial-scale processing, rather than static batch methods.

Q2: Can this patent be applied to other enzymes beyond the specific enzyme described?
A: The claims are generally applicable to enzymes compatible with the immobilization chemistry, allowing for broad application across various biocatalysts within the scope's framework.

Q3: What are the potential challenges in enforcing this patent?
A: Challenges include proving infringement in cases of similar reactor designs or immobilization methods that do not fall within the specific claims, especially given the prevalence of prior art in enzyme immobilization.

Q4: How might competitors circumvent this patent?
A: By designing alternative reactor configurations, using different immobilization chemistries, or employing batch processes to avoid the continuous operation claims.

Q5: What is the international significance of this patent?
A: Its innovative approach aligns with global trends in continuous bioprocessing, and similar claims are pursued in corresponding PCT filings, extending protection and market influence.


References

  1. [1] Japan Patent JP2013014613.
  2. [2] US patent US20170246552.
  3. [3] Japan Patent JP2013009878.
  4. [4] EP patent applications related to enzyme immobilization.
  5. [5] Industry reports on biocatalysis and continuous bioprocessing innovation.

Note: All references are indicative and based on publicly available information and related patents in the field.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.