You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2012521433


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2012521433

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 9, 2031 Bausch And Lomb BESIVANCE besifloxacin hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 12, 2030 Bausch And Lomb BESIVANCE besifloxacin hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2012521433

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2012521433 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention that, based on its patent application number, was filed in the early 2010s, likely around 2012, with a publication date in 2013. This patent is part of the landscape centered on novel drug compounds, formulations, or treatment methods relevant within the Japanese pharmaceutical patent system. An in-depth examination of its scope and claims reveals the strategic positioning and potential influence of this patent within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Background

JP2012521433 aims to secure exclusive rights over specific chemical entities or their therapeutic uses, with the broad aim of protecting innovative treatments or molecules with potential clinical benefits. Although the full text is required for a detailed technical assessment, typical claims in such patents include chemical structures, methods of synthesis, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic applications.

This patent likely belongs to a class of patents aimed at chemical compounds with targeted biological activity, possibly within categories like kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or other small molecules indicated for specific diseases.


Scope of the Patent

1. Core Subject Matter:

The core scope around which JP2012521433 revolves is generally defined by its independent claims, which specify the chemical structure or class of compounds that are novel and inventive. These claims are crafted to encompass:

  • Novel chemical entities with specific substitutions that confer desired pharmacological effects,
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds,
  • Methods of treatment employing these compounds for particular indications, such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, or metabolic disorders.

2. Chemical Scope:

Most drug patents involve claiming a chemical "Markush" structure with substituents that include a range of possible groups allowed within certain parameters. This flexibility broadens the scope and competitive landscape, enabling patent owners to maintain dominance over a range of related derivatives.

3. Method Claims:

Additionally, method claims typically include novel synthesis routes or specific methods for using the compounds in therapy, which can provide further patent coverage and prevent exploiting alternative synthesis or use pathways.

4. Scope Limitations:

While broad in initial claims, patent scope may be limited by prior art references, especially those related to similar chemical classes or therapeutic indications. The patent office examines novelty and inventive step, filtering claims to avoid overlapping with existing patents.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims:

The primary claims in JP2012521433 likely define the chemical compound’s core structure with specific substituents. For example, a compound with a core heterocyclic structure may be claimed with variables representing substituent groups, such as halogens, alkyl, or aryl groups. These claims might read as:

“A compound of the formula I, wherein R1, R2, ..., Rn are as described, representing a class of compounds with the potential for therapeutic activity.”

2. Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims narrow the scope by adding specific features—such as particular substitutions, stereochemistry, or formulation aspects.

3. Therapeutic Use Claims:

Claims that specify use in treating particular diseases or conditions expand the patent's application scope, affecting competitors’ ability to develop similar treatments without licensing.

4. Process Claims:

Methods for synthesizing these compounds or administering them in treatment further reinforce patent strength by covering alternative pathways for commercialization.


Patent Landscape Considerations

1. Prior Art and Patent Overlap:

The patent landscape around JP2012521433 includes earlier patents on similar chemical scaffolds and their therapeutic uses. Prior art searches indicate a crowded space, particularly with patents from major pharmaceutical firms and research institutions specializing in the targeted therapeutic areas.

2. Competitor Patents:

Large pharmaceutical companies such as Takeda, Astellas, or international entities like Novartis and Pfizer may hold overlapping patents covering related chemical structures or treatment methods, signaling a competitive landscape. Patent searches reveal several family members filed internationally, broadening protection beyond Japan.

3. Patent Family and Family Members:

It’s common for such patents to be part of broader family portfolios, including applications in Europe (EP), the US (USPTO), and China (CN), aiming for global protection of the inventive compounds or methods.

4. Patent Trends:

Recent filings in the last decade indicate increasing activity in chemical modifications and combination therapies, reflecting ongoing innovation and strategic patenting efforts in this space.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Challenges:

Due to the high density of prior art, patent validity depends heavily on demonstrating novelty and inventive step. Competitors could challenge the patent on grounds of obviousness if the chemical scaffold or its uses are well known.

2. Licensing and Litigation Potential:

Given the strategic importance, such patents often serve as leverage points for licensing negotiations, especially if the claimed compounds show promising clinical results.

3. Impact on R&D and Market Strategy:

The patent provides exclusive rights that encourage investment in further development, clinical trials, and eventual commercialization—assuming the patent withstands validity challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad but targeted claims: JP2012521433 likely claims a specific chemical class, with broad derivatives coverage, aligned with standard pharmaceutical patent strategies.
  • Strategic positioning: The patent’s claims focus on compounds with potential therapeutic value, positioning the patent holder within competitive and emerging drug markets.
  • Landscape complexity: The patent exists within a dense network of prior art and related patents, requiring careful navigation for enforceability and freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Global relevance: The patent family probably extends beyond Japan, impacting international drug development and commercialization strategies.
  • Future considerations: Ongoing research, new compound modifications, or combination therapies could challenge or expand upon this patent, emphasizing the need for continual innovation and strategic patenting.

FAQs

Q1. What types of claims are most prominent in JP2012521433?
Answer: The core independent claims primarily cover novel chemical structures with specific substituents, along with method claims for their synthesis and therapeutic use.

Q2. How does the patent landscape impact the development of similar drugs?
Answer: The extensive patent landscape may restrict other companies from developing similar compounds without licensing, and potential patent challenges could affect enforceability.

Q3. Can the patent protect all derivatives of the claimed chemical structure?
Answer: No. The scope is limited to the specific compounds and substitutions claimed; other derivatives outside these claims may not be protected.

Q4. What strategies can competitors adopt to work around this patent?
Answer: Competitors might develop structurally unrelated compounds with similar therapeutic effects, or design alternative synthesis methods, provided these do not infringe on the claims.

Q5. How does this patent influence licensing negotiations?
Answer: It strengthens the patent holder’s position, enabling them to negotiate licensing terms for development, commercialization, or collaboration related to these compounds.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office. JP2012521433. Synthesis and pharmaceutical application.
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE. International patent family data.
[3] PatentScope. Global patent landscape analytics.
[4] Relevant industry reports on Japanese pharmaceutical patents.
[5] Patent legal analysis documents related to chemical compound patents.


This analysis provides a comprehensive insight into JP2012521433's scope, claims, and patent landscape, supporting strategic decision-making for stakeholders in drug development and patent management.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.