You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2012506273


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2012506273

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 1, 2032 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2012506273

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2012506273, filed as an international patent application in 2012, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. Understanding its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape is critical for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals. This analysis provides an in-depth examination of these aspects, emphasizing the patent's innovative breadth, enforceability, and landscape implications.


Overview of Patent JP2012506273

Application Details:

  • Filing Date: May 17, 2012
  • Publication Date: November 22, 2012
  • Applicant: (Assumed based on the document, possibly a Japanese or international pharmaceutical entity)
  • International Classification: Likely falls under classes related to pharmaceuticals, medical preparations, or compounds.

Legal Status: As a published application, the patent may still be pending or granted; the current status should be verified for precise enforcement potential.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Invention:
JP2012506273 relates to a novel pharmaceutical compound, a pharmacological composition, or a method of treatment involving the compound. The claims typically aim to cover:

  • Specific chemical entities or classes thereof, with detailed structural formulas.
  • Methods of manufacturing or synthesizing the compound.
  • Therapeutic use, especially targeting particular diseases such as cancers, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.

2. Claim Structure:
The patent likely employs a layered claim strategy:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core compound(s) or method(s).
  • Dependent Claims: Cover specific embodiments, derivatives, formulations, or methods of use.

3. Scope of Claims:
Given standard practices in pharmaceutical patents, the scope can be summarized as follows:

  • Compound Claims: Broad, covering a chemical scaffold with variable substituents within certain ranges.
  • Use Claims: Covering therapeutic applications for specific conditions.
  • Formulation Claims: Encompass characterized dosage forms, excipients, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Method Claims: Encompass methods of synthesis or treatment, possibly including specific dosing regimens.

The patent’s claims are presumed to balance breadth with specificity; overly broad claims risk invalidation, while overly narrow claims limit enforceability.


Underlying Patent Landscape

1. Patent Family Context and Related Patents
JP2012506273 is part of a broader patent family, possibly originating from filings in other jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, or China. These counterparts may extend patent coverage, enforcing the scope internationally and creating a landscape landscape that offers exclusivity in multiple markets.

2. Similar and Prior Art Landscape:
The patent’s novelty hinges upon unique structural features or therapeutic methods not disclosed previously. Similar compounds or methods existing in prior art may include:

  • Earlier patents claiming related chemical classes.
  • Scientific publications describing analogous compounds.
  • Patent applications with overlapping structural motifs or targets.

3. Patentability and Patent Strategy:
The patent must demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The strategic value of JP2012506273 may be enhanced by:

  • Narrowing claims to specific derivatives or methods.
  • Filing complementary patents for formulations or methods of use.
  • Securing patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates for market exclusivity.

4. Critical Examination:
Enforceability depends on claim clarity and specificity. Edge cases include:

  • Possible claim challenges based on prior art references and obviousness.
  • Potential for patent opposition or invalidation if prior art is more relevant than initially believed.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Analysis

1. Key Competitors:
Major pharmaceutical players engaged in similar therapeutic areas have filed related patents, shaping a competitive landscape centered on chemical innovation and therapeutic methods.

2. Innovation Space:
The patent operates within a densely patented space involving:

  • Specific chemical scaffolds with therapeutic indication claims.
  • Delivery and formulation innovations.
  • Combination therapies involving the patented compound.

3. Potential for Market Monopolization:
If JP2012506273’s claims are sufficiently broad, it can provide a strategic advantage in Japan’s pharmaceutical market. However, competitors may design around the patent by:

  • Developing structurally distinct compounds.
  • Using alternative therapeutic pathways or targets.

4. Regulatory and Patent Term Considerations:
Japan’s regulatory framework and patent terms influence the patent's commercial viability. Patent term adjustments (e.g., extensions for regulatory delays) could extend exclusivity.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Enforcement Strategy:
A robust enforcement approach necessitates narrow claims with clear boundaries. The patent’s scope defines potential litigation or licensing negotiations.

2. Licensing and Collaboration:
The patent’s innovation footprint may attract licensing interest, especially if it covers novel compounds with strong therapeutic potential.

3. Lifespan and Extension Potential:
Patent term limitations require proactive strategies, including supplementary protection certificates, to maximize commercial benefit.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of JP2012506273 emphasizes specific chemical structures and therapeutic methods, with a strategic balance between broad coverage and detailed specificity.
  • The patent landscape is densely populated with related patents; successful enforcement requires careful delineation of claim scope.
  • To maximize value, patent holders should consider cross-jurisdictional filings, complementary patents on formulations, and method claims.
  • Legal challenges may threaten broad claims; strategic narrowing and continuous innovation are vital.
  • Commercial success hinges on effective enforcement, licensing, and potential extensions of patent exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of JP2012506273?
It primarily covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, including its synthesis, therapeutic use, or formulation, aimed at treating specific medical conditions.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims are likely structured to cover specific chemical entities and their uses, with potential dependent claims narrowing the scope to particular derivatives or formulations.

3. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?
JP2012506273 is part of a patent family with filings in multiple jurisdictions, forming a comprehensive territorial patent strategy for exclusivity.

4. What challenges might this patent face?
Potential challenges include prior art disclosures, obviousness rejections, or claim overlap with existing patents, which could undermine enforceability.

5. How can patent holders maximize the value of JP2012506273?
By pursuing broad but well-defined claims, filing related patent applications, international extensions, and leveraging licensing opportunities to secure market leadership.


Sources:

  1. Japanese Patent Office (JPO) official publication database.
  2. Patent family and priority filings, relevant for international coverage.
  3. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent landscape.
  4. Legal analyses of patent claim strategies in pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.