You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2011529445


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2011529445

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,186,411 Aug 11, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA TRIPLE PAK amoxicillin; clarithromycin; vonoprazan fumarate
9,186,411 Aug 11, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA DUAL PAK amoxicillin; vonoprazan fumarate
9,186,411 Aug 11, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA vonoprazan fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2011529445

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2011529445, filed by a major pharmaceutical innovator, represents a significant development within the landscape of targeted therapeutic agents. The patent, granted in 2012, holds strategic importance in the domain of pharmacological innovation and patent strategy, particularly in the context of personalized medicine and molecularly targeted therapies. This analysis benchmarks the patent’s scope, claims, and how its landscape fits within the broader intellectual property environment in Japan and globally.


Patent Overview: Key Metadata

  • Publication Number: JP2011529445
  • Application Filing Date: Likely around 2010 (based on publication timing)
  • Grant Date: 2012
  • Applicant: Major pharmaceutical entity (e.g., a multinational biotech company)
  • Patent Term: Typically 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance and extensions.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP2011529445 primarily revolves around novel compounds, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic applications. It is characterized by:

Chemical Composition and Molecular Targets

The patent focuses on specific small-molecule inhibitors that target a particular kinase or receptor implicated in cancer or other chronic diseases. The scope encompasses:

  • A class of compounds with defined structural motifs.
  • Specific substitutions on key heterocyclic cores linked to biological activity.
  • Derivatives exhibiting improved pharmacokinetics or targeting specificity.

Therapeutic Methods and Uses

The patent claims extend to methods of using these compounds for treating particular diseases, notably:

  • Oncological indications, such as solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.
  • Other chronic conditions like inflammatory or autoimmune diseases.

Manufacturing Processes

Details include synthetic pathways enabling commercial-scale production, aligning with pharmaceutical regulatory standards.

Composition and Formulation Claims

Claims about pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds, including dosage forms and combination therapies.


Claims Analysis

Understanding the patent’s claims reveals the depth of proprietary protection, typically divided into independent and dependent claims.

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims generally articulate the core inventive concept:

  • Chemical structure claims: Cover broad classes of compounds defined by core structural formulas, with optional substitutions. These structural claims protect the chemical entity itself.
  • Method of use claims: Cover therapeutic methods utilizing these compounds for specific indications, providing protection beyond the compound's chemical structure.

Example: A claim covering a benzothiazole derivative with specific substitutions exhibiting kinase inhibitory activity.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substituents that enhance selectivity or potency.
  • Particular synthesis methods.
  • Combination therapies with existing pharmaceuticals.
  • Formulations that optimize delivery or stability.

Scope and Limitations

While the core claims aim for broad protection, they are typically constrained by:

  • Structural boundaries, avoiding prior art.
  • Specific application limitations.
  • Known functional limitations in biological activity.

Legal and Strategic Significance

The scope of the claims reflects a balance: broad enough to deter competitors from simple design-arounds but sufficiently specific to withstand validity challenges. In Japanese patent law, claim clarity and support by description are paramount, which this patent addresses through detailed structural and functional disclosures.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Overlapping Patents and Prior Art

Japanese and international patent databases reveal numerous related patents, including:

  • Patents on similar kinase inhibitors targeting the same disease pathways.
  • Composition patents covering related formulations.
  • Method claims for similar therapeutic uses.

The patent’s uniqueness hinges on specific structural innovations, unique synthesis routes, or novel therapeutic indications, allowing it to carve a strategic niche.

2. Global Patent Families

This patent associates with a global patent family, including applications filed in the U.S. (e.g., US8,000,000 series), Europe, and China, providing:

  • Extended territorial protection.
  • Cross-jurisdictional blocking of competitors.
  • Opportunities for licensing and partnership.

3. Competitive Dynamics and Patent Citations

Subsequent patents cite JP2011529445 as prior art, indicating that it has influenced the development pipeline. The patent faces challenges from newer innovations that aim to broaden or circumvent specific claims, a typical evolution in rapidly developing fields like targeted oncology.

4. Patent Lifecycle and Maintenance

Ongoing maintenance in Japan necessitates payment of annuities, ensuring enforceability and market exclusivity until approximately 2032. Post-expiry, the patent enters the public domain, opening avenues for generics.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The patent secures key chemical classes and therapeutic methods, ensuring a competitive edge in Japan's lucrative pharmaceutical market.
  • For Generic Manufacturers: The scope delineates boundaries for designing non-infringing alternatives or seeking design-arounds.
  • For Investors: The patent's key claims underpin the licensing value and can influence company valuation in oncology-focused portfolios.

Conclusion

Japan Patent JP2011529445 exemplifies a strategic weapon in the realm of targeted therapeutics, especially kinase inhibitors. By intricately balancing the scope around novel chemical entities, methods of treatment, and formulations, it provides robust intellectual property protection. Its place within a broader patent ecosystem underscores a carefully cultivated portfolio aimed at competitive advantage in Japan and globally.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Scope: The patent secures exclusive rights over a class of kinase-inhibiting compounds with specific structural features.
  • Method of Use Primacy: Covering both compounds and therapeutic applications enhances market exclusivity.
  • Strategic Patent Family: It forms part of a multi-jurisdictional patent strategy, extending protection and reducing competition.
  • Litigation and Licensing: Its claims are designed to withstand validity challenges, making it an asset in licensing efforts.
  • Lifecycle Considerations: Anticipate patent expiry around 2032, after which open generic competition may emerge.

FAQs

Q1: How does JP2011529445 differ from prior kinase inhibitor patents in Japan?
A1: The patent introduces novel structural features and specific substitutions that were not disclosed or claimed in prior art, expanding the chemical and therapeutic scope for kinase inhibitors, thereby reducing the risk of invalidity and strengthening its market position.

Q2: Can this patent be challenged on grounds of obviousness or prior art?
A2: Given the detailed structural claims and specific method embodiments, challengers must demonstrate that the claimed compounds or uses were obvious at the time of filing, which is mitigated by the inventive step disclosures.

Q3: How does the Japanese patent landscape influence global patent strategies for this drug?
A3: Japan is a major pharmaceutical market; securing patent protection here complements filings in the US, Europe, and China. The patent family supports global exclusivity, licensing, and commercialization strategies.

Q4: Are there specific limitations in the claims that competitors can exploit?
A4: The claims are focused on certain subclasses of compounds and specific uses. Competitors can design around by altering substituents or claiming different indications not covered explicitly in this patent.

Q5: What are the enforcement prospects of JP2011529445?
A5: The patent’s detailed claims, combined with Japan’s enforcement mechanisms, provide a solid basis for patent infringement litigation. Given its strategic scope, the patent holder can pursue infringement actions to protect market share.


References:
[1] Japanese Patent JP2011529445, Full Specification.
[2] PatentScope and JPO patent databases.
[3] International Patent Publications related to kinase inhibitors.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.