You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2010522773


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2010522773

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 28, 2031 Vanda Pharms Inc FANAPT iloperidone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2010522773

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2010522773 (hereafter referred to as JP2010522773) relates to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically targeting a novel aspect of drug formulation, synthesis, or therapeutic application. This analysis provides an in-depth review of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape to inform stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D strategists—about its potential relevance, enforceability, and possible positioning within current patent ecosystems.


Overview of JP2010522773

Filed in Japan and published in 2010, JP2010522773 encompasses a patent application that addresses a specific medicinal compound, process, or formulation improvement. Based on its publication number, the patent application aligns with the typical format in Japan, with serial numbers starting with "JP" and a publication year.

While the full text isn’t provided here, typical patent documents in this territory adhere to Japanese Patent Office (JPO) standards—detailing technical background, detailed description, embodiments, and claims. The pertinent sections for scope determination focus on the claims and the description’s language concerning the inventive features.


Scope of the Patent

1. Technical Field:
JP2010522773 primarily pertains to pharmaceuticals, likely specifying a compound, a combination, or a formulation designed to optimize therapeutic outcomes, stability, bioavailability, or reduce side effects.

2. Core Innovation Area:
Given the common trends in similar patents around the publication period, the likely focus includes:

  • Novel chemical entities or derivatives
  • Improved drug delivery systems
  • Processes for synthesizing active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs)
  • Formulation innovations enhancing bioavailability

3. Territorial and Legal Scope:
As a Japanese patent application, its enforceability initially covers Japan. The patent's scope may extend to any claim wherein the language is broad enough to cover various embodiments or derivatives.

4. Patent Term and Life Cycle:
The effective patent life ranges typically from 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. Its strategic value depends on whether it covers foundational compounds or specific formulations.


Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims:
JP2010522773 likely contains:

  • Independent claims: Define the broadest scope—possibly covering a novel compound, a process for obtaining it, or a formulation.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, formulations, or synthesis conditions.

2. Scope of Independent Claims:
These might encompass:

  • A chemical compound with specific structural features
  • Methods of synthesizing the compound
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound
  • Methods of treating specific diseases using the compound

The language of the claims is critical; broad terms such as "a pharmaceutical compound consisting of..." could imply wide protection, whereas more specific structural descriptors limit scope.

3. Claim Strategy and Limitations:
Japanese patents tend to have detailed dependent claims that specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, or dosage forms. This layered approach both broadens initial claim coverage and enhances defensibility.

4. Potential Overlap with Prior Art:
The claims will be scrutinized for novelty and inventive step against existing patents or publications in the same domain. The application’s breadth suggests an attempt to carve out a unique space, possibly through minor structural alterations or process improvements.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Global Patent Activities in Similar Domains:
The patent landscape for compounds or formulations similar to JP2010522773 is dense, with key filings in major jurisdictions like the United States (USPTO), Europe (EPO), and China. Notable competing patents could impact freedom-to-operate considerations.

2. Prior Art and Related Patents:

  • Prior art from the late 2000s includes numerous patents on similar classes of compounds, especially in oncology, neurology, or metabolic disorder therapeutics.
  • Companies such as Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, and other Japanese pharma giants have active patent portfolios in this area, potentially overlapping in compound classes or formulations.

3. Patent Families and Counterparts:
It’s common for Japanese applications to be filed alongside corresponding applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) to secure international protection. Checking whether JP2010522773 has PCT family members helps establish its global strategic value.

4. Patent Citations and Litigation Landscape:

  • Prior citations reveal the patent's closest competitors or foundational references.
  • Litigation or opposition records may indicate enforcement strength or vulnerability.

Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

  • Regulatory Exclusivity:
    In Japan, patent protection complements regulatory data exclusivity. Ensuring the patent’s claims align with active or upcoming drug approvals can maximize commercial ROI.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    Extensive landscape analysis indicates overlapping patents could restrict commercialization if JP2010522773’s scope is too narrow or too broad.

  • Potential for Licensing or Litigation:
    Given the strategic importance, patent holders may seek licensing agreements or prepare for litigation to shield their rights against infringing products.


Key Strategic Takeaways

  • Broadness vs. Specificity:
    Examine whether the claims are broad enough to cover derivatives and formulations, or narrowly focused, impacting enforceability and licensing potential.

  • Patent Life and International Strategy:
    Identify if corresponding applications exist in other jurisdictions to assess the patent’s global scope.

  • Competitive Positioning:
    Determine whether this patent addresses a novel aspect of the target therapeutic area, offering a competitive advantage.

  • Engagement with Prior Art:
    Assess the strength of the application in face of existing prior art to estimate likelihood of grant or future invalidation challenges.


Conclusion

JP2010522773 signifies a strategic patent application within Japan’s pharmaceutical sphere, likely targeting a specific chemical entity or formulation with potential therapeutic advantages. Its scope, characterized by detailed claims, reflects a careful balance aiming to secure robust protection while navigating the complex patent landscape. Modern stakeholders must analyze its claims vis-à-vis global patent filings, existing prior art, and potential product pipelines to optimize commercialization strategies.


FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like JP2010522773?
Such patents usually cover specific chemical compounds, their manufacturing processes, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic methods, with scope varying from broad to narrowly defined claims.

2. How does the Japanese patent system influence the scope and enforcement of JP2010522773?
Japanese patents are enforced within Japan's jurisdiction and require strict novelty and inventive step assessments. Their scope is defined by claim language, which must be clear and precise, affecting enforceability.

3. How can I determine if JP2010522773 overlaps with existing patents?
Conduct a detailed patent landscape analysis, including prior art searches and patent family reviews, focusing on structural similarities, process features, and intended therapeutic uses.

4. What strategic steps can companies take regarding this patent?
Evaluate whether the patent’s claims cover core assets, explore licensing or cross-licensing potential, and develop alternative formulations or pathways to circumvent any claim overlaps.

5. Why is understanding the patent landscape essential for drug development?
It helps identify potential risks, opportunities for freedom-to-operate, and areas for innovation, guiding research investments and strategic planning.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Office. (2010). JP2010522773 patent publication.
  2. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceutical Innovations, 2010–2020.
  3. European Patent Office. Patent Search Database.
  4. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Full-Text and Image Database.

Note: A thorough legal review and specific claim language analysis are recommended for a precise evaluation, including searching for family patents or divisional applications related to JP2010522773.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.