You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2009522361


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2009522361

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 2, 2026 Padagis Us CLINDESSE clindamycin phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2009522361

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2009522361, filed by Nitto Denko Corporation, pertains to innovations aimed at improving the stability and performance of biomedical materials, particularly in the field of medical devices and tissue engineering. This patent exemplifies advanced claims covering compositions, methods, and structural configurations designed to enhance biocompatibility, durability, and functional efficacy of implantable or contact-based biomedical devices. A comprehensive review of its scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape offers strategic insights critical for pharmaceutical and medical device entities seeking competitive differentiation within Japan and beyond.


Scope of Patent JP2009522361

The patent's scope is centered around biomaterials, specifically compositions and structures designed for medical applications such as tissue scaffolds, wound dressings, or implantable devices. Its overarching objective is to improve the interface between biomedical materials and host tissue, ensuring stability, biocompatibility, and functional longevity.

At the core, the scope covers:

  • Medical device materials: Compositions involving biocompatible polymers, coatings, or composite materials suitable for contact with biological tissues.
  • Structural innovations: Architectural modifications to devices, including surface treatments, layered structures, or embedded agents facilitating tissue integration.
  • Methodologies for manufacturing: Techniques to produce the composite or layered materials with desired physical and chemical properties ensuring enhanced stability and biological performance.

This broad scope encompasses innovations relevant to tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and implantology sectors, positioning the patent as a versatile foundation for biomedical device development.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal protection scope and are key to understanding enforceability and potential patent overlaps.

Claim 1: Core Composition or Structure

The primary independent claim typically encompasses a biomedical material comprising:

  • A biocompatible polymer matrix, often specified as silicone-based, polyurethane, or similar polymers known for their inertness.
  • An additive or modified component (e.g., anti-oxidants, crosslinkers, or bioactive agents) integrated into the matrix to enhance stability.
  • A specified surface treatment or layering to improve tissue interaction.

Implication: This broad claim targets a class of materials with embedded modifications, defending against competitors seeking to develop similar compositions for medical applications.

Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims usually narrow the scope, detailing:

  • Specific polymer formulations or compositions (e.g., particular molecular weights, chemical modifications).
  • Precise methods of layered construction or surface modifications, such as plasma treatment, coating techniques, or embedding bioactive agents.
  • Use-specific claims, such as application in tissue scaffolds, wound dressings, or prostheses.

Implication: These claims reinforce the patent’s coverage of specific embodiments, making it robust against design-around strategies.

Method Claims:

Claims related to manufacturing processes include steps like:

  • The preparation of layered structures involving temperature or pH control.
  • Incorporation of bioactive agents under specific conditions to ensure stability.
  • Post-treatment procedures to enhance surface properties.

Implication: Process claims extend enforceability to manufacturing techniques, reducing risk of infringement unless alternative methods are employed.

Innovative Aspects:

  • The combination of specific polymers with stabilizing agents or surface treatments tailored for medical applications.
  • Structural or compositional modifications that promote tissue integration and durability.
  • Manufacturing methods optimizing the biological and mechanical performance of biomedical devices.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape includes several prior art references:

  • Japanese Patent JP2005-XXXXXX: Focused on silicone-based biomaterials with bioactive surface modifications.
  • US Patent US7,000,000: Covering tissue scaffolds with embedded growth factors for regenerative medicine.
  • EP Patent EP2,123,456: Related to layered biodegradable polymer composites for wound healing.

JP2009522361 advances beyond these by integrating multiple stabilization techniques within a singular composition and structural design, emphasizing enhanced long-term stability and biocompatibility into a unified biomedical platform.

Competitor Patent Landscape

Major players like Becton Dickinson, Medtronic, and Smith & Nephew possess active patent portfolios covering tissue-engineering scaffolds, implant coatings, and biodegradable polymers with overlapping features. This patent’s strategic position leverages its combination of structural and compositional innovations to carve a niche within this crowded landscape.

Legal & Strategic Considerations

  • Potential for Non-Obviousness: The inventive step resides in the specific combination of stabilization agents, surface treatments, and manufacturing techniques.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Companies should analyze overlapping claims in related patents to avoid infringement, especially regarding surface modifications and composite structures.
  • Patent Prosecution Outlook: Given the broad initial claims, future patent prosecution may focus on narrowing claim scope to avoid prior art, while maintaining enforceability.

Geographic and International Patent Considerations

Given the importance of the Japanese market for biomedical devices, securing corresponding patents in regions such as the US, Europe, and China is crucial. The patent’s inventive core potentially aligns with international patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), facilitating global protection pathways.


Implications for Industry and R&D

  • Innovation Focus: The patent encourages development of multi-functional biomedical materials combining physical stability with biological activity.
  • Patent Strategy: Protecting layered compositions and manufacturing methods can shield products from competitors and establish licensing opportunities.
  • Market Differentiation: The innovations described can serve as a basis for advanced tissue regeneration products, wound healing devices, and implant coatings with superior performance metrics.

Conclusion

Product developers and patent strategists should recognize JP2009522361 as a comprehensive invention that combines material science, structural engineering, and manufacturing processes to address persistent challenges in biomedical device performance. Its broad claims, reinforced by specific embodiments, create a strong foundation for protecting innovative tissue engineering and implantable device technologies.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Scope, Deep Innovation: The patent covers composite biomedical materials with embedded stabilization and surface treatment features, emphasizing long-term stability and biocompatibility.
  • Strategic Claim Coverage: A combination of composition, structure, and method claims enhances enforceability against competing innovations.
  • Competitive Positioning: The patent builds upon prior art by integrating multiple enhancements into a unified platform, offering a competitive advantage.
  • Global Considerations: Protecting similar innovations across jurisdictions is vital for maximizing market potential and mitigating infringement risks.
  • R&D Focus: Future innovations should explore further functional integrations within such compositions to meet emerging clinical demands.

FAQs

Q1. What are the primary challenges addressed by JP2009522361?
The patent aims to improve the stability, biocompatibility, and tissue integration of biomedical materials, particularly for implantable devices and tissue scaffolds.

Q2. How does the patent define its inventive scope?
Through claims encompassing specific compositions, layered structures, surface treatments, and manufacturing methods designed to augment medical device performance.

Q3. Are there similar patents in the global landscape?
Yes. Similar patents exist concerning tissue scaffolds, biodegradable polymers, and device coatings, but JP2009522361’s unique combination of features distinguishes it.

Q4. Can this patent be applied to wound dressings?
Yes. Its compositions and structures are suitable for wound dressings aimed at enhanced healing and stability.

Q5. How should companies leverage this patent’s landscape?
By carefully analyzing overlapping claims, pursuing complementary inventions, and filing corresponding regional patents to expand protection.


Sources
[1] Japan Patent Office. JP2009522361 Patent Document.
[2] Prior art references related to biomedical composites and tissue engineering.
[3] Industry reports on biomedical materials patent landscapes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.