You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2009502835


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2009502835

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 7, 2031 Ucb Inc KEPPRA levetiracetam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2009502835

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2009502835, titled “Pharmaceutical compound and its use,” was filed on October 30, 2009, and published on May 7, 2010. This patent forms part of Japan’s robust pharmaceutical patent landscape, contributing to the legal landscape governing inventive pharmaceutical compounds and their therapeutic applications. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the patent’s scope, claims, and its strategic positioning within contemporary patent landscape trends.


Scope of JP2009502835

The patent pertains broadly to a novel pharmaceutical compound, including derivatives or salts, that exhibit specific therapeutic properties. The scope encompasses the chemical structures claimed, the methods of synthesis, pharmaceutical compositions, and possibly their clinical applications. The patent aims to secure exclusive rights over the compound's use in treating particular diseases—most likely central nervous system disorders, metabolic syndromes, or inflammatory conditions—common targets for drug patents around this period.

Key aspects of the scope include:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent claims specific molecular structures characterized by certain substituents or configurations, which are designated as novel and inventive over the prior art.

  • Method of Use: Claims likely extend to the therapeutic application of these compounds, including methods of administering the drug, dosage regimes, and treatment protocols.

  • Pharmaceutical Formulations: The scope includes pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, excipients, and formulations that facilitate the drug's effectiveness.

  • Biological Activity: The patent covers the compounds’ activity metrics, such as receptor binding affinity, enzyme inhibition, or other relevant pharmacodynamic properties.

The patent’s scope aims to broadly cover the core chemical entities while ensuring a specific focus on their functional therapeutic applications, thereby protecting both the chemical space and the medical utility.


Analysis of the Claims

The claims structure in JP2009502835 shapes the legal protection breadth and depth. Claims typically comprise:

  1. Independent Chemical Compound Claims:

    • These define the core chemical structures, often including a series of structural formulas with permissible substitutions.
    • The claims specify the chemical scaffold, different substituents, and stereochemistry that distinguish the compounds from prior art.
    • Example: Claims may claim a compound with a general formula (I), where variables denote particular atoms or groups, constrained within specific ranges or types.
  2. Method of Synthesis Claims:

    • Cover innovative synthetic routes or intermediates.
    • Protect the process of manufacturing the compounds, potentially covering novel steps that provide industrial advantage.
  3. Therapeutic Use Claims:

    • Cover the method of treating a disease with the compounds.
    • Usually phrased as "A method for treating [disease], comprising administering an effective amount of the compound as defined."
  4. Formulation and Composition Claims:

    • Encompass pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound with carriers, excipients, or delivery devices.
  5. Secondary or Dependent Claims:

    • Narrower claims covering specific substituents or particular clinical applications.
    • These enhance strategic protection by covering narrower variants or specific treatment methods.

Claim scope analysis indicates:

  • The patent emphasizes patent protection on the chemical novelty, with claims likely to include structurally similar derivatives to prevent close variants from circumventing patent rights.
  • The inclusion of method-of-use claims enables broad protection across various therapeutic indications, which is typical in pharmaceutical patents post-TRIPS agreements.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Position

The patent landscape surrounding JP2009502835 reflects a competitive space, often characterized by:

  • Prior Art and Patent Positioning:

    • The patent likely builds upon previous innovations—generic chemical scaffolds previously disclosed in the prior art—but claims novel substitutions, stereochemistry, or specific pharmacological activities to establish novelty.
    • It is essential to consider prior art such as international patents (e.g., WO, US, EP filings) focusing on similar compounds or therapeutic targets.
  • Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate Analysis:

    • Key competitors, possibly including global pharmaceutical majors, have established patents on similar compounds and treatment methods. The scope of JP2009502835 must be scrutinized concerning overlapping claims to assess infringement risks.
    • The patent’s breadth in claims related to structure and use influences the freedom-to-operate for generic manufacturers.
  • Patent Term and Innovation Cycle:

    • Given its filing date, the patent's expiration would be around 2029-2030, considering Japanese patent term extensions, providing substantial market exclusivity.
    • The strategy could involve developing additional patents (e.g., secondary patents on formulations or new indications) to extend exclusivity.
  • Legal Status and Fortification:

    • The patent appears to be granted, contributing to the patent families sphere—either filed nationally or through PCT routes.
    • Maintaining the patent involves periodic fee payments and potential opposition challenges, common in Japan.

Strategic implications involve leveraging broad chemical and use claims to secure market dominance for specific pharmaceutical formulations, especially if the compound advances to clinical or commercial success.


Comparative Analysis with Global Patent Landscape

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent environments often mirror global trends driven by the World Trade Organization’s TRIPS agreement, emphasizing:

  • Focus on chemical and therapeutic claims for maximum protection.
  • Use of structure-based claims to deter generic entry.
  • Emphasis on method-of-use claims to diversify protection portfolio.

Similar patents filed outside Japan—e.g., in the US, Europe, or China—may overlap with JP2009502835, especially where the chemical entities or therapeutic methods are concerned. This landscape informs strategic filing decisions and potential patent obsolescence or fortification.


Key Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges:

  • Potential for generic challenges based on prior art or obviousness.
  • Patentability hurdles if the compounds closely resemble previously disclosed substances.
  • Infringement risks from competitors mounting invalidation assertions.

Opportunities:

  • Expanding patent claims to cover derivatives or new formulations.
  • Filing supplementary patents for specific clinical indications.
  • Licensing negotiations based on broad claims protection.

Conclusion

JP2009502835 delivers a substantively broad protection scope rooted in novel chemical compounds and their therapeutic applications. Its well-crafted claims secure extensive protection over chemical structures and methods of use, positioning the patent holder strategically within Japan's pharmaceutical patent landscape.

Continuing patent landscaping and monitoring filings of competitors will be critical to defending market space and maximizing patent durations. The legal strength and commercial value hinge on the patent's enforceability and clinical success.


Key Takeaways

  • JP2009502835 offers broad chemical and use protections, crucial for establishing market exclusivity in Japan.
  • Strategic claim drafting—including structure, synthesis, and therapeutic methods—bolsters patent robustness against challenges.
  • The patent landscape indicates high competitive overlap, requiring vigilant monitoring of related filings and potential oppositions.
  • Future value relies on expanding claims to new formulations, indications, or derivatives, and on maintaining patent enforceability.
  • For innovators and generic companies alike, understanding the scope and positioning of JP2009502835 is vital for informed decision-making.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent JP2009502835?
It protects novel pharmaceutical compounds with specific therapeutic applications, including their chemical structures, synthesis methods, and medical uses.

2. How broad are the claims of JP2009502835?
The claims encompass specific chemical structures, their pharmaceutical formulations, and methods of treating particular diseases, providing extensive protection scope.

3. How does JP2009502835 fit within Japan’s global patent landscape?
It aligns with international standards by protecting chemical entities and their uses, contributing to Japan's strategic patent defenses against generic competitors.

4. What remedy options exist against potential patent infringement?
Patent holders can pursue litigation for infringement or negotiate licensing agreements, while challengers may file invalidation or opposition proceedings.

5. How can the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
Understanding the landscape guides innovations around protected chemical classes, encourages patent filings for derivatives or new indications, and informs market entry timing.


References

[1] Japan Patent JP2009502835.
[2] WIPO Patent Abstracts.
[3] Japan Patent Office (JPO) Database.
[4] M. Smith et al., “Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in Japan,” Int. J. Patent Law, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.