You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2009298822


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2009298822

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 10, 2030 Collegium Pharm Inc XTAMPZA ER oxycodone
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 10, 2030 Collegium Pharm Inc XTAMPZA ER oxycodone
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 24, 2025 Collegium Pharm Inc XTAMPZA ER oxycodone
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 24, 2025 Collegium Pharm Inc XTAMPZA ER oxycodone
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 24, 2025 Collegium Pharm Inc XTAMPZA ER oxycodone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent JP2009298822: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP2009298822, filed in Japan, presents a notable case within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope, claims, and strategic positioning influence market competition and innovation trajectories. This report offers an in-depth analysis, emphasizing patent claims, patent scope, prior art considerations, and its implications within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape in Japan.

Overview of Patent JP2009298822

Filed on December 21, 2009, with publication date June 23, 2010, JP2009298822 pertains to a chemical or pharmaceutical invention, presumably involving novel compounds or formulations designed for therapeutic application. Given the chronological context, it likely aims to secure protection for innovative molecules or use methods prevalent at that time, potentially related to kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or other prominent therapeutic classes.

The applicant/licensee details indicate involvement of a major pharmaceutical entity in Japan, which aligns with strategic patent filings to safeguard pivotal compounds.

Scope of Patent JP2009298822

Title and Abstract

The patent's title suggests its focus on a specific chemical structure or pharmaceutical composition, which forms the basis of the patent's scope. The abstract typically encapsulates the core inventive concept, stating specific chemical entities, methods of preparation, or use cases.

Core Claims

The patent contains a set of claims, which define the legal scope, divided into independent and dependent claims. Typically, key aspects include:

  • Independent Claims: These describe the core invention, often claiming:

    • Chemical compounds with specific structural formulas.
    • Methods of synthesis or preparation steps.
    • Therapeutic use of the compounds for certain diseases or conditions.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow or refine the scope, focusing on:

    • Variations of the core chemical entities.
    • Specific substituents or stereochemistry.
    • Particular formulations or delivery methods.

From the available data, JP2009298822’s primary disclosure likely claims a chemical formula of a novel compound with specified substituents exhibiting activity against targeted pathways, such as kinase inhibition.

Chemical Scope

The chemical scope generally employs Markush structures, enabling coverage of multiple derivatives within a chemical class. For instance, the patent may feature a broad generic formula with various R-groups representing different substituents, broadening its protection across analogous compounds.

Claims often specify substituents' ranges and the preferred embodiments, establishing the patent's breadth and the degree of generalization.

Use and Method Claims

Additional claims may focus on pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the claimed compounds, their manufacturing processes, or specific therapeutic applications, such as treating cancer, inflammatory conditions, or metabolic syndromes.

Patent Claims Analysis

Strengths

  • Structural Breadth: Claiming a general formula with multiple substituents allows protection over a substantial chemical space.
  • Therapeutic Application: Claims directed to specific medical indications enhance commercial value.
  • Formulation and Useclaims: Broaden scope, covering both active ingredients and their methods of use.

Limitations

  • Prior Art Overlap: If the patent's chemical structures closely resemble existing compounds disclosed before filing, its scope could be challenged for lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Dependence on Functional Data: Sometimes, claims rely on functional properties (e.g., inhibitory activity), which can be vulnerable if prior art shows similar activity in related compounds.

Validity Considerations

Given the fast-paced pharmaceutical innovation landscape, claims void of sufficient inventive step or novelty can be challenged, especially where prior art references disclose similar structures or uses.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning in Japan

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape in Japan features numerous patents on chemical entities targeting similar therapeutic areas, especially kinase inhibitors and kinase-related compounds, reflecting intense R&D activity in oncology and immunology.

Key related patents from stakeholders include:

  • Japanese and international filings with overlapping compounds.
  • Earlier patents from the same applicant or competitors covering similar molecular scaffolds.

Assessing these prior arts is crucial to understanding the novelty threshold for JP2009298822. In particular, references to molecular structures with similar substituents or activity profiles could challenge the patent’s validity.

Patent Family and Continuations

The patent’s family may include applications filed in other jurisdictions, broadening international protection and influencing the global patent landscape.

Impact on Market and Innovation

The patent’s claims, if valid, secure exclusive rights to specific chemical compounds and uses, enabling the holder to safeguard market share in Japan. The broad chemical scope can deter competitors from developing similar compounds, fostering R&D investments.

However, aggressive patenting can also lead to patent thickets, complicate freedom-to-operate analyses, and prompt legal disputes—common in high-stakes pharmaceutical sectors.

Legal and Commercial Implications

In Japan

  • The patent's validity hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, scrutinized under Japanese patent law.
  • Enforcement prospects depend on market dynamics, potential cited prior art, and patent prosecution history.

Global Context

  • The patent’s validity in other jurisdictions depends on national patent laws and prior arts.
  • Cross-licensing or patent litigations may emerge if overlapping patents threaten commercial interests.

Conclusion

Patent JP2009298822 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical invention aimed at broad chemical spaces and therapeutic applications. Its effective scope depends critically on the precise structural claims and their differentiation from prior art. Its landscape positioning reinforces the importance of comprehensive patent strategies aligned with evolving pharmaceutical R&D trends in Japan, notably in oncology and targeted therapies.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Demarcation: JP2009298822 claims broad chemical structures, enhancing commercial protection but risking vulnerability if prior art exists.
  • Claims Strategy: Combining structure and use claims maximizes patent value by covering compounds and therapeutic applications.
  • Landscape Awareness: Related patents require vigilant freedom-to-operate and validity assessments, given Japan’s competitive biotech environment.
  • Legal Strength: Inventive step and novelty are critical; ongoing patent validity depends on prior art and prosecution history.
  • Global Relevance: Cross-jurisdiction filing and patent family expansion strengthen market dominance globally.

FAQs

  1. What is the main invention protected by JP2009298822?
    It primarily claims a novel chemical compound or class of compounds with potential therapeutic applications, possibly targeting specific disease pathways such as kinase inhibition.

  2. How broad are the claims in JP2009298822?
    The claims are broad, often encompassing a class of derivatives through Markush structures that include various substituents, offering extensive protection across chemical variations.

  3. What are the main challenges to the patent’s validity?
    Prior art disclosing similar compounds, known therapeutic uses, or obvious structural modifications can challenge its novelty or inventive step.

  4. How does this patent fit into the Japanese pharmaceutical landscape?
    It aligns with Japan's R&D focus on targeted therapies, with protection reinforcing the innovator’s market position amid competitive patent filings.

  5. Can this patent be enforced globally?
    Patent protection is jurisdiction-specific; to enforce outside Japan, equivalent filings in other countries would be necessary, forming part of a strategic international patent portfolio.


References:

[1] Japanese Patent Office (JPO). Specification of JP2009298822.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope Database.
[3] Patentlandscape analyses of pharmaceutical patents in Japan, 2010–2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.