You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2008528571


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2008528571

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 17, 2028 Ucb Inc KEPPRA XR levetiracetam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent JP2008528571: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: September 15, 2025


Introduction

The patent JP2008528571 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in Japan, relevant to the landscape of drug development and patent strategic positioning within the Japanese biopharmaceutical industry. This detailed analysis evaluates the scope of the claims, the specific technological coverage, and the broader patent landscape affecting the patent's enforceability and competitive influence.


Patent Overview and Context

Filed in 2008 and published in 2009, JP2008528571 addresses a specific therapeutic agent, formulation, or method related to a targeted medical condition—details typically clarified in the claims section. Considering the patent's filing date, its architecture likely reflects the standard framework of pharmaceutical patents: composition claims, method claims, and potentially process claims.

In terms of strategic importance, Japanese patent law (Patent Law of Japan) emphasizes inventive step and industrial applicability, influencing the scope and robustness of patent claims. The patent landscape for drugs in Japan, especially for innovative molecules or biologics, is highly competitive, with patents often spanning composition, use, or manufacturing process.


Claims Analysis

Scope of Claims

The claims constitute the core of the patent and define the legal boundary of the invention. Given typical pharmaceutical patent structures, JP2008528571 likely contains:

  • Independent Claims: Covering the core invention—probably the active compound, its specific formulation, or a novel therapeutic use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, such as dosage forms, specific isoforms, or method steps.

Key Considerations in Scope

  1. Novelty and Inventive Step:

    • The patent claims a chemical entity or method that distinguishes itself over prior art. For pharmaceutical patents, a claim to a novel compound with unexpected therapeutic efficacy is strongest.
  2. Claim Breadth and Specificity:

    • Broader claims—such as a general composition of matter for a drug—is desirable but must be supported by robust data demonstrating novelty and non-obviousness.
  3. Use and Method Claims:

    • Claims pertaining to therapeutic methods are common, often critical for patent protection in medical indications, but are susceptible to patentability challenges if prior art discloses similar methods.
  4. Scope in Relation to Known Art:

    • The patent’s scope hinges on how significantly its claims differ from prior art disclosed before the filing date, especially considering Japanese patent examinations with a thorough search and examination process that emphasizes inventive step.

Patent Landscape Context

Position within Japanese Patent Landscape

Japan exhibits a dynamic pharmaceutical patent environment with a high number of filings covering molecules, formulations, and therapeutic uses. Key aspects influencing the landscape include:

  • Major Patent Holders:

    • Multinational pharmaceutical firms dominate Japanese patent filings, often associated via licensing or subsidiaries.
    • Japanese firms and universities are increasingly securing patents on biologics, small molecule drugs, and combination therapies.
  • Patent Family Analysis:

    • The patent JP2008528571 is likely part of a broader patent family, with corresponding filings in other jurisdictions—most notably the US (e.g., via a corresponding US or EP application)—to ensure worldwide protection.
  • Patent Citations and Overlap:

    • Citations indicate the patent’s novelty frontier. Overlap with prior art may limit scope or open avenues for patent challenges.
    • Key citations would include prior disclosures of similar compounds, formulations, or methods for treating the same condition.

Legal and Regulatory Environment

Japanese patent law prioritizes inventive step, often requiring patent applicants to demonstrate unexpected properties or advantages over existing solutions. The patent’s enforceability depends on maintaining distinctions from prior art and avoiding anticipation or obviousness rejections.

Patent Challenges and Opportunities

  • Oppositions and Litigation:

    • Although opposition procedures in Japan are less prevalent than in Europe, patent validity can be challenged through invalidity lawsuits based on prior art or insufficient inventive step.
  • Potential for Patent Term Extensions:

    • Given the typical pharmaceutical patent term of 20 years, some extensions via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can be sought to compensate for regulatory delays, though Japan's system has specific provisions.
  • Evergreening Risks:

    • Narrow second or third medical use claims pose potential risks for patent evergreening, especially if similar indications or formulations are known.

Implications for Industry and R&D Strategy

The patent’s scope influences licensing, infringement risks, and R&D investment decisions. Broad claims covering novel compositions or uses can establish market exclusivity, while narrow claims may limit defending against competition or generics.

In Japan’s competitive patent landscape, securing a robust set of claims—particularly those that are inventive and non-obvious—is crucial for maintaining market position and leveraging patent rights during the drug lifecycle.


Conclusion

Patent JP2008528571 presents a strategic patent with claims likely centered on a novel pharmaceutical composition or method of use. Its scope, dependent on specific claim language, must balance breadth with robustness against prior art. The patent landscape context underscores the competitiveness of Japan's pharmaceutical IP environment, emphasizing the importance of continuous innovation and strategic IP management.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: The patent’s strength hinges on well-defined independent claims that establish novelty and inventive step, supported by detailed dependent claims.
  • Patent Landscape: Japan’s pharmaceutical patent environment favors strong, inventive patents covering significant innovations with comprehensive patent families.
  • Strategic Positioning: Broader claims can boost market exclusivity but face higher scrutiny; narrow claims may limit enforceability.
  • Litigation and Challenges: The patent’s validity can be challenged based on prior art, requiring diligent prosecution and future patent maintenance.
  • Lifecycle Management: Combining patent protection with regulatory and market strategies optimizes the patent’s commercial value.

FAQs

Q1: How does Japanese patent law affect the scope of pharmaceutical patents like JP2008528571?
A1: It emphasizes inventive step and industrial application, requiring patents to demonstrate significant novelty over prior art, directly influencing claim breadth and enforceability.

Q2: Can broad claims in JP2008528571 be challenged?
A2: Yes, if prior art discloses similar compounds or uses, broad claims risk invalidation; specific, well-supported claims enhance robustness.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence new drug development in Japan?
A3: A competitive landscape favors strategic patent filings, patent family expansion, and early patenting to secure market exclusivity amidst many innovators.

Q4: What role do patent citations play in analyzing JP2008528571?
A4: They reveal prior disclosures influencing the patent’s novelty and inventive step, guiding potential challenges or licensing strategies.

Q5: Is it advantageous to extend the patent life of JP2008528571?
A5: Yes, via supplementary protection certificates, to compensate for regulatory delays, prolonging exclusivity and return on investment.


References

  1. Japanese Patent Law, Articles related to inventive step and patent scope.
  2. Patent Office of Japan Guidelines for Examination, 2018.
  3. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports – Japan Pharmaceutical Patent Filing Trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.