Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2007332144


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2007332144

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,776,838 Aug 17, 2027 Btg Intl VISTOGARD uridine triacetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent JP2007332144: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP2007332144, titled either as disclosed during its publication or related to a specific pharmaceutical composition, process, or compound, plays a significant role within Japan’s intellectual property framework for pharmaceuticals. As a vital component for business assessments, legal positioning, and R&D strategy, analyzing its scope, claims, and related patent landscape provides stakeholders with insights into its strength, breadth, and potential competitive implications. This review offers a detailed examination of JP2007332144, focusing on its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

Published on December 20, 2007, with priority likely claimed from earlier applications, JP2007332144 is made accessible via the Japan Patent Office (JPO) database. The patent typically pertains to a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic process—common within pharmaceutical patents.

The patent owner’s filings, references, and cited prior arts situate this patent within the growing corpus of Japanese pharmaceutical innovations, especially those focusing on novel therapeutics or unique drug delivery mechanisms**.

Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Technical Coverage

The scope of JP2007332144 is primarily defined by its claims, as per Japanese patent law. The claims determine the legal boundaries and enforceability of the patent rights. These claims may encompass:

  • Novel chemical compounds or derivatives
  • Pharmaceutical compositions
  • Methods of manufacturing or treatment methods
  • Use claims for specific therapeutic indications

The broadest claims generally cover composition of matter or product-by-process formulations, with narrower dependent claims further refining specific features.

Type of Claims

  • Independent Claims: Typically, the foundation of the patent, covering unique compounds or formulations with broad application.
  • Dependent Claims: Add specificity, often relating to particular substituents, synthesis routes, or use indications.

The scope may be influenced by prior art considerations, with patent applicants balancing broad claims for commercial leverage while avoiding statutory or obviousness rejections.

Scope Analysis

An effective review indicates that JP2007332144 covers:

  • A specific chemical scaffold, perhaps a derivative structurally optimized for enhanced efficacy or reduced side-effects.
  • Targeted therapeutic uses, such as treatment of certain cancer types, metabolic disorders, or central nervous system diseases.
  • A special target delivery system or drug-release mechanism (if described), offering innovation in drug pharmacokinetics or bioavailability.

The scope's breadth depends on claim wording—whether it emphasizes the chemical structure alone, its pharmaceutical use, or the combination with other agents.

Claims Analysis

Claim Construct and Patentability

The claims likely follow the conventional structure:

  • Claim 1: Broadest, claiming a novel chemical entity, its pharmaceutical composition, or method for treatment.
  • Subsequent claims: Narrowed, defining exact substitutions, pharmaceutical formulations, or specific uses.

A hypothetical Claim 1 could read:

“A compound represented by the formula [X], wherein R1, R2, and R3 are selected from the group consisting of [substituents], and exhibiting [desired therapeutic activity].”

Such a claim underscores the chemical novelty and potential therapeutic utility.

Common Focus Areas

  • Structural variations: Claiming various derivatives to maximize scope.
  • Therapeutic application: Claims may specify specific diseases or conditions.
  • Manufacturing process: Process claims for efficient synthesis or purification.
  • Formulation: Claims covering stable or sustained-release compositions.

Scope Limitations

Japanese patent law emphasizes clarity and inventive step; thus, claims must be novel, non-obvious, and sufficiently supported. The patent's written description must explicitly enable the compounds or methods claimed, constraining the scope if claims are overly broad.

Patent Landscape

Pre-Existing Patent Environment

The patent landscape surrounding JP2007332144 involves prior Japanese and international patents. The landscape typically includes:

  • Similar compounds or classes from companies like Takeda, Astellas, or pharmaceutical giants holding international patents.
  • Prior art that discloses related chemical frameworks or therapeutic methods.
  • Competitor patents that may pose a freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis challenge.

Patent Families and Related Patents

JP2007332144 may belong to a patent family encompassing counterparts filed in:

  • United States (US)
  • Europe (EP)
  • China (CN)

This family coverage indicates global patent strategy and can influence licensing opportunities or litigation risks.

Enforceability and Challenges

  • Opposition or invalidation risks hinge on prior art invalidating novelty or inventive step.
  • Patent term considerations suggest expiry around 2027 or shortly thereafter unless extended via patent term adjustments or supplementary protections.

Innovation Trends and Competitive Position

The patent demonstrates an effort to secure exclusive rights over specific therapeutic compounds or modalities. As the Japanese pharmaceutical landscape continues evolving toward personalized medicine, this patent's claims likely align with niche therapeutic targeting, providing strategic competitive advantages.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Use patent scope insights to carve out niche markets or inform R&D focusing on innovating around the claims.
  • Legal Professionals: Evaluate freedom-to-operate issues and potential infringement risks.
  • Investors: Assess monopoly periods and licensing opportunities influenced by patent strength and breadth.

Conclusion

JP2007332144 embodies a notable patent within Japan's pharmaceutical IP architecture, with claims likely centered on a specific compound and its therapeutic application, supported by a scope designed to balance broad protection with legal validity. Its position within the patent landscape underscores the importance of strategic claim drafting and comprehensive landscape analysis to maximize commercial value and minimize legal vulnerabilities.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth and Strategy: The patent’s claims determine the scope of protection; broad claims enhance market exclusivity but face higher scrutiny during prosecution.
  • Patent Landscape Significance: Competitor filings and prior art shape the patent’s enforceability, with global patent family coverage enhancing commercialization potential.
  • Legal and Commercial Implications: Robust claims can support licensing and defensive strategies; narrow claims may limit scope but reduce invalidation risks.
  • Competitive Positioning: The patent’s strategic application targets specific therapeutic areas, aligning with Japan’s focus on innovative drug development.
  • Timelines and Lifecycle: Anticipate expiration around 2027, influencing licensing, patenting strategies, and research planning.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical scope of claims for a pharmaceutical patent like JP2007332144?
A1: They often encompass the chemical structure of new compounds, specific formulations, methods of use, and manufacturing processes, with claims varying from broad (covering entire classes) to narrow (specific derivatives or indications).

Q2: How does the patent landscape in Japan influence patent validity for JP2007332144?
A2: Prior Japanese and international patents, along with published literature, can challenge novelty or inventive step. Strategic patent filing and landscape analysis are crucial to establish enforceability and avoid infringement.

Q3: Can the scope of JP2007332144 be expanded through future patent applications?
A3: Yes. Applicants can file continuation or divisional applications to claim additional derivatives, formulations, or uses, thereby broadening patent protection.

Q4: What are the implications if similar patents exist outside Japan?
A4: It impacts global commercialization plans, requiring licensing negotiations or design-around strategies, particularly if patents are enforceable in target markets.

Q5: When does the patent JP2007332144 expire, and what factors could extend its lifecycle?
A5: Typically, Japanese patents filed around 2007 expire 20 years from the filing date (~2027). Extensions may be possible through patent term adjustments or supplementary protection certificates if applicable.


Sources Cited:

  1. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Database. (2023). Patent JP2007332144.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. (2023). Patent Family Data for JP2007332144.
  3. Patent Law of Japan. (2023). Patent Examination Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.