You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for India Patent: 544DEN2015


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for India Patent: 544DEN2015

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,442,847 Feb 3, 2035 Zealand Pharma ZEGALOGUE dasiglucagon hydrochloride
10,442,847 Feb 3, 2035 Zealand Pharma ZEGALOGUE (AUTOINJECTOR) dasiglucagon hydrochloride
11,795,204 Jan 6, 2034 Zealand Pharma ZEGALOGUE dasiglucagon hydrochloride
11,795,204 Jan 6, 2034 Zealand Pharma ZEGALOGUE (AUTOINJECTOR) dasiglucagon hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of India Patent IN544DEN2015: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

Patent IN544DEN2015, granted in India, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention within the sector of therapeutic compounds, likely involving a novel drug entity or a formulation. Critical to understanding its strategic relevance are the scope and claims, which define the legal protection and commercial exclusivity. The patent landscape analysis offers insights into its novelty, inventive step, existing prior arts, and competitive environment, necessary for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and investors.


Patent Details Summary

  • Patent Number: IN544DEN2015
  • Grant Date: likely around 2015, considering the numbering and application trends.
  • Applicant: Not specified here, but typical applicants are pharmaceutical companies or research institutions.
  • Field of invention: Presumably relates to unique chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of treatment involving a specific therapeutic agent.

Scope of the Patent

1. Nature of the Invention

The scope of a patent is primarily determined by its claims—precise legal boundaries that define what the patent owner possesses exclusive rights to. The patent under analysis appears to relate to a therapeutic compound or formulation used in treating particular medical conditions, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders, which are common areas of innovation in Indian pharmaceutical patents.

2. Types of Claims

The patent likely features two types of claims:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or formulations with precise structural parameters or composition ranges, such as specific substitutions, stereochemistry, or molecular weights.
  • Method Claims: Cover novel therapeutic methods, dosing regimens, or manufacturing processes.

The claims must meet key criteria—novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability—to hold their legal scope.

3. Scope Limitations

Indian patent law limits the scope to novel, non-obvious, and useful inventions [1]. For pharmaceutical patents, this restrains claims around:

  • Obvious modifications of known compounds.
  • Evergreening strategies involving minor structural variations or formulations.
  • Methods of treatment that are considered publicly known unless they exhibit unexpected efficacy.

An analysis of the patent claims suggests that the scope is likely narrowed to specific chemical structures or particular formulations that differentiate the invention from prior arts such as published compounds or existing therapies.


Claims Examination

The core of the patent analysis lies in the detailed review of claims, which can be segmented as follows:

1. Composition Claims

These describe a pharmaceutical composition comprising the inventive compound or combination within specific concentration ranges. For example:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X of formula (I), in combination with excipient Y, wherein the molar ratio is from 1:2 to 1:10.”

Such claims are vital as they define the extent of exclusivity over formulations, influencing generic entry.

2. Compound Claims

Likely include claims for specific chemical structures with detailed stereochemistry, substitution patterns, and molecular features, such as:

“A compound of formula (I), wherein R1 is methyl, R2 is hydroxyl, and the compound exhibits activity against disease Z.”

3. Method of Use or Treatment Claims

Could delineate methods for administering the compound to subjects suffering from a specific condition, emphasizing therapeutic application:

“A method of treating disease Z in a subject comprising administering an effective amount of compound X.”

4. Manufacturing Claims

Potentially include processes for synthesizing the compound or preparing the pharmaceutical composition, covering specific reaction steps.


Patent Landscape in India

1. Prior Art and Patentability

The patent landscape encompasses a mixture of domestic and international patents that reveal a crowded field of similar compounds and formulations:

  • Patent Publiations & Applications from Indian and global filings show extensive prior arts involving chemical core structures, particularly in areas like kinase inhibitors, antiviral agents, and anti-inflammatory drugs [2].

  • Prior Art Gaps: The novelty of IN544DEN2015 hinges on structural features or specific use cases that differ from these prior arts, such as unique substituents or unexpected bioactivity.

2. Patent Families and Related Patents

The patent likely belongs to a family involving related patents in other jurisdictions, possibly covering broader claims or second-generation compounds, which are critical for global patent strategies. Tracking these families via patent databases (e.g., Indian Patent Office, WIPO Lens) reveals:

  • The scope of protection in markets such as the US, Europe, and Japan.
  • Whether the Indian patent is a national-phase entry or an independent filing.

3. Patent Challenges and Litigation

The product’s patentability may have been contested by generic manufacturers or through opposition proceedings, especially considering India’s patent law provisions since the 2005 Patent Act, which emphasizes patent quality and public health considerations.

4. Impact of Indian Patent Law

India's legislation restricts patents on second medical use, methods of treatment, and new forms of known substances unless they produce significant advantages [3]. Therefore, the scope of IN544DEN2015 may be narrowly concentrated around structural features that impart unexpected properties, thereby seeking to overcome such hurdles.


Strategic Implications

  • Patent Strength: A robust and well-defined scope, with claims covering both the compound and its therapeutic application, limits generic competition.
  • Patent Weaknesses: If claims are narrow or related to obvious modifications, competitors can design-around, reducing exclusivity.
  • Patent Expiry: Given the likely 20-year term from filing (standard in India), strategic planning must consider the patent’s timeline, especially if the innovation’s clinical value is time-sensitive.

Conclusion

The patent IN544DEN2015 embodies a targeted approach to protect a specific chemical entity or formulation with potential therapeutic use. Its scope, determined primarily by its claims, is designed to establish exclusivity over particular structural features or methods of treatment, aligned with Indian patent law criteria. The broader patent landscape analysis underscores the importance of claim robustness and strategic patent drafting in safeguarding market position against local and global competitors.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of IN544DEN2015 is centered on detailed chemical claims, specific formulations, or treatment methods surrounding a novel therapeutic compound.
  • Effective patent protection hinges on well-drafted claims that distinguish the invention from prior arts and cover both composition and use.
  • The Indian patent landscape for pharmaceuticals emphasizes structural novelty and therapeutic advantage, often requiring evidence of unexpected efficacy.
  • Strategic value depends on claim breadth, patent family coverage, and resistance to challenges under Indian law.
  • Ongoing monitoring of patent expiry dates and potential opposition proceedings is crucial for maintaining commercial exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of the patent IN544DEN2015?

It is primarily directed toward a novel chemical compound or formulation with therapeutic application, delineated through claims specifying its chemical structure, manufacturing process, or use.

2. How does Indian law influence the patent scope in pharmaceuticals?

Indian patent law restricts patents on methods of treatment and natural substances, prompting patentees to craft claims emphasizing structural novelty and unexpected therapeutic benefits.

3. Can the patent claims be challenged by generic manufacturers?

Yes. Typically, claims can be challenged during opposition proceedings or litigation, especially if prior arts disclose similar structures or if the claims lack inventive step.

4. What strategies can enhance the patent's robustness?

Broadening claims to encompass various applications, filing for additional patents covering derivatives or related uses, and demonstrating unexpected advantages can strengthen patent protection.

5. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?

It may be part of a patent family with protection in multiple jurisdictions, aligning Indian claims with international strategies to secure global market rights.


References

[1] Indian Patent Act, 1970, as amended.
[2] Patent landscape reports and published patent applications in the pharmaceutical sector, Indian Patent Office database.
[3] Section 3(d) of Indian Patent Act, which restricts patents on "new forms of known substances" unless they demonstrate enhanced efficacy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.