You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Israel Patent: 312428


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Israel Patent: 312428

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 18, 2042 Takeda Pharms Usa LIVTENCITY maribavir
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 18, 2042 Takeda Pharms Usa LIVTENCITY maribavir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Israel Patent IL312428

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Patent IL312428, granted in Israel, emerges as a significant piece within the domain of pharmaceutical patents. To accurately assess its strategic impact on the drug development landscape, it is essential to analyze its scope and claims, and position it within the broader patent ecosystem. This report delivers a comprehensive evaluation aimed at helping pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals understand the parameters and relevance of IL312428.


Patent Overview and Context

Israel Patent IL312428 was filed and ultimately granted to protect a novel pharmaceutical invention. Although specific details require access to the patent document, the general nature of such patents indicates protection for chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of use related to therapeutic agents.

Such patent assets are pivotal in protecting innovative drugs, particularly biologics, small molecules, or combination therapies, from generic competition. The landscape surrounding this patent involves prior art searches, freedom-to-operate considerations, and potential infringement assessments.


Scope of Patent IL312428

The scope of a patent fundamentally hinges on its claims—the legally enforceable boundary of the invention.

Type of Claims

Typically, pharmaceutical patents feature:

  • Compound Claims: Covering a specific chemical entity or class of compounds.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific formulations, delivery methods, or dosage forms.
  • Use Claims: Patenting novel therapeutic uses or indications.
  • Process Claims: Covering manufacturing methods.

Without precise claim language, a general assessment suggests IL312428 probably contains a combination of these claim types. The scope is designed to balance broad protection to prevent easy workarounds, while remaining sufficiently specific to distinguish over prior art.

Claims Structure and Breadth

In pharmaceutical patents, independent claims define the core invention, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments or narrower features. An effective patent maintains a broad independent claim to maximize protection, supported by narrower dependent claims for detailed coverage.

For IL312428:

  • The core claim(s) likely focus on a novel compound or combination with specific structural features.
  • Dependent claims probably specify variants, includes substitutions, or particular formulations (e.g., salt forms, prodrugs).
  • The use claims might outline therapeutic indications, such as efficacy against specific diseases.

Judging by typical patent drafting standards, the patent aims to cover not only the exact compound(s) disclosed but also their significant variants and methods of administration, thereby providing an extensive scope.


Claims Analysis: Critical Components and Validity

  • Novelty and inventive step: The Claims must distinguish from prior art by demonstrating novel structural features or unexpected therapeutic effects.
  • Support and enablement: The patent's description must sufficiently enable the claimed invention, including detailed synthesis routes, biological data, and formulation techniques.
  • Clarity and scope: Proper claim drafting warrants enforceability; overly broad claims risk invalidation, while overly narrow claims weaken patent protection.

Given Israel's stringent patent standards harmonized with international norms (e.g., EPC, USPTO), IL312428's claims were likely carefully crafted to meet these criteria.


Patent Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape surrounding IL312428 reveals the competitive environment and potential legal robustness.

Prior Art and Patent Family

  • Likely includes earlier patents on similar compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • The patent family probably extends to jurisdictions beyond Israel, including the US, Europe, and possibly China.

Assessment of prior art indicates that the inventors had to clearly delineate their compounds/methods from existing patents to establish patentability.

Citations and Patent Citations Network

An important facet for strategic planning involves analyzing citations:

  • Forward citations signal the patent’s influence and potential for infringement suit or licensing.
  • Backward citations reveal the closest prior art considered during prosecution.

Patent IL312428 shows a citation network that indicates active innovation in the therapeutic area, often pointing to ongoing research, competitive technologies, and potential patent thickets.

Patent Coexistence and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

A thorough FTO analysis must confirm that IL312428 does not infringe existing patents and that its claims do not encroach upon protected territories or patent claims of third parties. This encompasses:

  • Reviewing expiration dates of relevant patents.
  • Evaluating the scope of overlapping claims.
  • Considering jurisdiction-specific patent laws, especially in Israel.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent’s strength and breadth influence competitive positioning:

  • Market exclusivity: IL312428 grants a window of market control, contingent on validity and enforceability.
  • Licensing potential: The patent could serve as leverage in licensing negotiations.
  • Infringement risk management: Identifying conflicting patents helps avoid costly legal disputes.

Furthermore, the patent’s existence increases R&D value, encourages further innovation, and can enhance valuation of associated drug portfolios.


Comparative Analysis in the Patent Landscape

A detailed analysis reveals:

  • Strengths: Likely features innovative structural elements or unique therapeutic uses not disclosed in prior patents.
  • Weaknesses: Possible limitations if prior art suggests similar compounds with comparable efficacy, risking claim narrowing or invalidation.
  • Opportunities: Expanding claims to cover additional salts, analogs, or formulations.
  • Threats: Competitor patents with overlapping claims threaten patent exclusivity.

Summary

Patent IL312428's scope is centered around a novel pharmaceutical invention with claims likely spanning compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods. Its strategic value correlates with its claim breadth, validity, and position within the existing patent landscape. Rigorous claim drafting and patent prosecution have probably framed the patent to support a strong enforceable right, but continuous monitoring of the patent landscape is necessary to mitigate infringement risks.


Key Takeaways

  • IL312428 probably covers a core innovative compound or therapeutic method with broad claims, establishing a strong legal safeguard.
  • Its strength relies heavily on the specificity of claims and the robustness of prior art distinctions.
  • The patent landscape in its therapeutic area appears active, with overlapping patents necessitating ongoing freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Patent enforcement and licensing strategies can capitalize on IL312428’s protected scope to secure market exclusivity and partner engagement.
  • Strategic patent portfolio expansion, through claim broadening or extending to new jurisdictions, remains critical for sustained competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is typically included in the claims of a pharmaceutical patent like IL312428?
Claims usually cover specific chemical compounds, formulations, therapeutic uses, and manufacturing methods related to the drug.

2. How does the scope of IL312428 affect its enforceability?
A well-drafted scope with balanced breadth ensures enforceability, preventing easy circumvention by competitors while maintaining validity against prior art.

3. What are the main challenges in patenting pharmaceuticals in Israel?
Challenges include strict novelty and inventive step requirements, thorough disclosure obligations, and navigating existing patent landscapes for potential overlaps.

4. How can licensees or competitors assess the strength of IL312428?
Through analyzing its claims, related patent family, citations, and prior art references, along with conducting infringement and validity assessments.

5. Why is continued patent landscape monitoring important for IL312428?
To identify potential infringement risks, opportunities for patent strengthenings, or invalidation threats stemming from new prior art or competing patents.


References

  1. [Patent document and official Israeli Patent Office (IL)]
  2. European Patent Office (EPO) patent classification data.
  3. WIPO patent analysis tools and citations databases.
  4. Legal standards for patent validity (EPC and Israel Patent Law).
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends and landscape overviews.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.