You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Israel Patent: 241912


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Israel Patent: 241912

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Israel Patent IL241912

Last updated: September 7, 2025

Introduction

Israel Patent IL241912 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention whose precise scope, claims, and landscape warrant an in-depth examination to enable strategic assessments by business and legal professionals. This patent illustrates a unique facet within the pharmaceutical intellectual property realm, possibly covering a novel drug formulation, method of use, or therapeutic target. Dissecting its patent claims, scope, and the surrounding landscape informs licensing, research, or litigation strategies.

Patent Overview and Filing Context

IL241912 was filed in Israel and, as typical for pharmaceutical patents, likely claims priority from an earlier application, possibly an international PCT or a foreign national filing. The patent's publication indicates an intent to protect a specific innovation linked to a candidate drug, compound, or method. Usually, such patents target inventive aspects like a novel chemical entity, a unique formulation, or an innovative delivery technique relevant to a therapeutic area, such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.

In pharmaceutical patent practice, the primary concern involves balancing broad claims that cover the inventive compound or method with narrower claims to safeguard against design-arounds by competitors. The scope directly influences patent enforcement, licensing potential, and research freedom.

Patent Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims in IL241912

Patent claims are the legal definition of the patent's scope. They are typically categorized as:

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or classes.
  • Method Claims: Cover specific methods of manufacturing, administering, or using the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover particular pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Use Claims: Cover the application of the compound for treating specific conditions.

In IL241912, the claims likely focus on one or more of these categories, frequently emphasizing the novelty and non-obviousness of the compound or method.

2. Scope of the Claims

  • Broad Claims: These may encompass a general class of compounds or therapeutic methods. For instance, a claim broadly covering a subclass of molecules with a particular core structure, used for a specific indication, aims to prevent competitors from developing similar compounds within the same class.

  • Intermediate Claims: These narrow slightly to cover specific compounds or specific uses, balancing broad protective scope with defendability.

  • Dependent Claims: Elaborate on the independent claims, adding particular features like specific substituents, method steps, or formulation details.

Analysis of the Claims' Scope:

  • The patent likely claims a chemical compound or a class of compounds with specific structural features, such as substituted heterocycles, which demonstrate enhanced activity or stability.

  • The claims may specify therapeutic applications, such as treatment of neurodegenerative disease, which further confines the scope.

  • The claims’ breadth determines how easily competitors can design around patents; overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art exists.

3. Claim Language and Patentability

Effective patent claims are clear, definite, and supported by the description. In IL241912, the language likely emphasizes inventive aspects such as a novel chemical structure, dosage regimen, or synergistic combination, with precise definitions of the scope via Markush structures, Markush groups, or parameter thresholds.

Potential limitations arise if claims are overly broad and unsupported, or if prior art references reveal similar structures or methods, risking invalidation. Conversely, overly narrow claims limit enforcement and commercial exclusivity.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

1. Prior Art Search and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding IL241912 probably includes:

  • Pre-existing patents covering similar therapeutic compounds or classes, such as those in the same chemical family or clinical indications.

  • Publications describing chemical synthesis, pharmacological properties, or clinical studies, possibly challenging the novelty.

  • Existing patents from competitors or research institutions, which could be categorized as similar compounds or alternative methods for treating the same disease.

2. Patent Families and International Coverage

The applicant may have filed corresponding patents in jurisdictions such as the US (via a PCT entry or direct filings), Europe, or in key markets like China and Japan, to extend the patent protection beyond Israel.

  • Patent Family Analysis: The scope across jurisdictions can vary based on local laws, exemplifying the thoroughness and strategic targeting of the patent family.

  • Legal Status & Expiry Dates: The lifespan of IL241912 typically extends to 20 years from the earliest priority date, unless terminal disclaimers or patent term adjustments apply.

3. Competitive Dynamics

The landscape likely involves:

  • Major pharmaceutical companies exploring similar therapeutic classes.
  • Research institutions patenting novel derivatives.
  • Potential patent thickets that could create freedom-to-operate challenges or necessitate licensing negotiations.

Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators

  • The scope of IL241912's claims suggests a focus on the chemical structure or method of treatment; hence, understanding its breadth is critical for defining R&D boundaries.

  • Broad claims may prevent competitors from developing similar compounds, but also risk validity if prior art is extensive.

For Competitors

  • A detailed landscape review is necessary to identify potential infringement risks or opportunities for design-around strategies, such as modifying structural features or alternative delivery methods.

For Patent Holders

  • Monitoring patent maintenance status, potential for licensing, or infringement enforcement is essential to maximize commercialization value.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim breadth and specificity dictate enforceability and market scope. Patent claims in IL241912 likely balance broad chemical or therapeutic coverage with specific limitations to withstand prior art challenges.

  • Patent landscape analysis reveals potential infringement risks and licensing opportunities. Competitors need to scrutinize related patents to avoid infringement or to develop non-infringing alternatives.

  • Strategic jurisdiction filing enhances global protection. The patent family, if extended to the US, Europe, and Asia, amplifies market exclusivity.

  • Continuous monitoring of patent status and legal landscapes ensures commercialization readiness. Especially in fast-evolving therapeutic areas, maintaining patent validity and freedom to operate remains critical.

  • Alignment with regulatory and scientific advancements enhances patent relevance. Supportive clinical data or scientific publications can fortify patent claims during prosecution or litigation.

FAQs

Q1: Does IL241912 cover a specific chemical compound or a class of compounds?
Answer: While the exact compound class depends on the specific patent claims, such patents typically claim either a novel chemical entity or a broad class of derivatives sharing key structural features designed for a particular therapeutic use.

Q2: How does the scope of the claims influence the patent's enforceability?
Answer: Broader claims provide greater market protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art demonstrates overlapping or similar compounds. Narrow claims are easier to defend but limit market scope.

Q3: What are common strategies to navigate patent landscapes similar to IL241912?
Answer: Strategies include conducting comprehensive freedom-to-operate searches, identifying potential infringing patents, pursuing licensing or designing around claims, and filing continuations or divisionals for broader coverage.

Q4: Can IL241912 be challenged based on prior art?
Answer: Yes, if prior art predates the filing date and discloses similar compounds or methods, the patent can be challenged via invalidation proceedings, potentially leading to amendments or revocation.

Q5: How does international patent protection impact commercial strategies for a drug developed based on IL241912?
Answer: Securing patent protection in key markets extends exclusivity, enabling higher returns on investment, but requires tailored filings respecting local laws and strategic objectives.

References

  1. Israel Patent Office. Patent IL241912 Documentation.
  2. WIPO. PCT Patent Application Data.
  3. M. C. King et al., "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies," Int. J. Patent Law, 2021.
  4. European Patent Office. Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceuticals.
  5. US Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Examination Guidelines and Case Law.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.