You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Profile for Hungary Patent: E061697


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hungary Patent: E061697

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
⤷  Start Trial Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
⤷  Start Trial Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
⤷  Start Trial Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
⤷  Start Trial Jul 1, 2036 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hungary Drug Patent HUE061697

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent HUE061697, registered in Hungary, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention and plays a crucial role within the regional intellectual property landscape. This detailed analysis dissects its scope, claims, and broader patent environment to facilitate strategic decision-making. Understanding the patent’s breadth, the scope of its claims, and the competitive landscape is vital for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D entities.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: HUE061697
  • Jurisdiction: Hungary (European patent jurisdiction via national validation or application process)
  • Filing & Priority Data: Historically filed under the Hungarian Patent Office, with potential priority filings in EPC or PCT jurisdictions (specifics depend on available documentation).
  • Status: Pending, granted, or lapsed—status assessment is vital but requires official patent register confirmation.

Note: The patent appears to relate to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation based on industry classifications, although explicit technical details are necessary for precise analysis.


Scope of the Patent

The scope defines the technical boundaries and rights conferred by patent HUE061697. It enforces exclusivity over specific innovations, which could include:

  • Novel chemical entities or analogs
  • Specific formulations or delivery methods
  • Manufacturing processes or synthesis routes
  • Therapeutic methods involving the compound

Assessment of Scope:

  • Chemical Composition and Formula:
    If the patent delineates a particular compound structure, it likely claims a class of molecules with defined functional groups, substitutions, or stereochemistry (e.g., a new beta-lactam antibiotic or kinase inhibitor).

  • Method of Use:
    The patent may encompass specific therapeutic applications, e.g., a patented use for treating a certain disease such as oncology, infectious diseases, or autoimmune conditions.

  • Formulation & Delivery:
    It could extend to innovative formulations, sustained-release therapies, or specific excipient combinations.

  • Manufacturing & Synthesis:
    Methods for producing the compound with improved yield or purity can also be protected, broadening the scope beyond the compound alone.

Evaluation:
The detailed scope hinges on the explicit claims, which are critical to determine the patent's enforceability and potential for infringement or licensing opportunities.


Claims Analysis

The claims are the heart of patent protection, precisely defining what the patent owner regards as their invention. They are categorized into:

  • Independent Claims:
    Broader, foundational claims defining the core invention, such as a novel compound or primary therapeutic method.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrower claims providing specific embodiments, manufacturing techniques, or particular uses.

Typical claim structures in pharmaceutical patents include:

  • Compound Claims:
    e.g., “A compound comprising the structural formula I as shown, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or stereoisomer thereof.”

  • Use Claims:
    e.g., “Use of compound X for the treatment of disease Y.”

  • Formulation Claims:
    e.g., “A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X and excipient Z.”

  • Process Claims:
    e.g., “A process for synthesizing compound X involving steps A, B, and C.”

Claim breadth determines the patent’s strength:

  • Broad Claims:
    Covering entire classes of compounds or methods; offer extensive protection but are more vulnerable to invalidity or non-infringement challenges.

  • Narrow Claims:
    Specific compounds or methods; easier to defend but offer limited coverage.

Critical observations:

  • Ambiguous or overly broad claims can lead to invalidation or license difficulties.
  • Clear definitions of molecular structures, ranges, or specific use scenarios are advantageous.
  • Multiple dependent claims provide fallback positions and increased enforceability.

Patent Landscape in Hungary and Regional Context

Hungary Patent Environment:

  • The Hungarian Patent Office (HIPO) operates similarly to other European national patent offices, with validations based on EPC principles.
  • Pharmaceutical patents are subject to both national law (Act No. LXXVI of 1993) and European regulations, especially if extended through the European Patent Office (EPO).
  • Hungary has a robust patent system aligned with EPC standards, with a typical patent term of 20 years from the filing date.

Regional and European Considerations:

  • European Patent System:
    Unitary or validated European patents often influence Hungarian patent landscape.

  • Patent Litigation & Enforcement:
    The Hungarian courts uphold patent rights, with litigation focused on validity and infringement.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Active players include multinational pharmaceutical companies, regional biotech firms, and generic manufacturers.

  • Patent clustering around specific therapeutic areas can indicate dominant innovation or potential patent thickets.

  • Patent publications in the European Patent Bulletin or WIPO databases can provide insight into overlapping claims or freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations.

Existing Patent Families & Art:

  • Related filings within Europe or globally may include similar compounds or formulations, influencing patentability and licensing negotiations.

  • Prior art searches suggest that the patent may face challenges if identical or similar compounds are disclosed elsewhere, underscoring the importance of the novelty and inventive step.


Legal & Strategic Considerations

  • Stakeholders should analyze the scope in relation to existing patents.
  • Consider potential for patent dominance or risk of infringement.
  • Evaluate the strength of the claims based on the specificity of the molecular structures or methods claimed.
  • Examine whether the patent's claims are susceptible to invalidity based on prior art, especially if filing dates predate the patent application.

Conclusion & Strategic Implications

Patent HUE061697 represents a potentially critical intellectual property asset within Hungary's pharmaceutical sector. Its scope and claims determine its enforceability, reach, and commercial value.

For innovators and patent holders:

  • Careful claim drafting and continuous landscape vigilance are essential.
  • Broad, well-defined claims maximize market protection.
  • Licensing and partnership strategies can leverage the patent's exclusivity.

For competitors:

  • Analyzing the claims provides insight into possible design-arounds or challenges.
  • Patent landscape mapping supports strategic R&D investment and FTO assessments.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: The strength of patent HUE061697 depends on the clarity and breadth of its claims, particularly the specific molecular structures or therapeutic methods protected.

  • Claims Strategy: Multiple dependent claims and specific embodiments enhance enforceability, while overly broad claims risk invalidation.

  • Regional Landscape: Hungary's alignment with the EPC system facilitates patent protection but companies should monitor regional and European patents for overlapping rights.

  • Patent Validity & Challenges: The patent’s longevity hinges on its novelty, inventive step, and non-obviousness relative to prior art.

  • Commercial Insights: Effective patent management, including strategic prosecution and vigilant monitoring, underpins market exclusivity and revenue potential.


FAQs

1. How does the breadth of patent claims influence enforcement in Hungary?
Broader claims can provide extensive protection but are more vulnerable to invalidity challenges. Precise, well-supported claims strengthen enforcement by clearly delineating the invention’s scope.

2. Can patent HUE061697 be challenged on grounds of prior art?
Yes. Common grounds include lack of novelty or inventive step if similar compounds or methods are disclosed before the filing date. Prior art searches in patent databases and scientific literature are essential.

3. What is the significance of dependent claims in pharmaceutical patents?
Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, providing fallback protection, and helping prevent workarounds. They also assist in defending against validity challenges.

4. How does Hungary's patent system compare with broader EU patent protections?
Hungary operates within the EPC framework, allowing European patent validation, which offers broad protection across EU member states. National patents provide localized rights but can be complemented by European patents.

5. What are strategic considerations for companies seeking to license patent HUE061697?
Evaluating the strength of the claims, potential for patent infringement, and competing patents is imperative. Licensing opportunities hinge on patent scope, market exclusivity, and the patent owner’s licensing strategy.


References

[1] Hungarian Patent Office (HIPO) Official Gazette
[2] European Patent Convention (EPC) regulations and guidelines
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Patents
[4] Industry-specific patent law analyses and guidelines

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.