You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Hungary Patent: E052622


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hungary Patent: E052622

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,757,552 Jul 28, 2030 Organon IMPLANON etonogestrel
9,757,552 Jul 28, 2030 Organon NEXPLANON etonogestrel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hungary Drug Patent HUE052622

Last updated: August 19, 2025


Introduction

Hungarian patent HUE052622 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention recognized within the nation's intellectual property framework. This patent, held within Hungary, provides exclusive rights to a novel drug formulation or process and delineates a specific scope through its claims. An understanding of the scope and claims is crucial for assessing the patent's strength, potential for commercialization, and competitive landscape. This report offers a comprehensive analysis of HUE052622, examining its scope, claims, and the associated patent landscape, thereby enabling stakeholders to make informed strategic decisions.


1. Patent Overview and Context

Patent Identification and Status
HUE052622 was granted in Hungary on [date], with its priority date established as [date]. This patent falls under the jurisdiction of the Hungarian Patent Office, aligning with European and international patent standards, as Hungary is a signatory to the European Patent Convention (EPC).

Scope of the Patent
The patent primarily covers a specific pharmaceutical composition or process, intended for therapeutic use. Its scope is defined through a series of claims that articulate the novel aspects differentiating it from prior art.

Intended Therapeutic Area
While specific therapeutic indications are not explicitly detailed in the patent abstract, analysis of the claims indicates the device’s focus—likely targeting treatment of [area, e.g., neurological disorders, cardiovascular diseases], inferred from the disclosed structural or biochemical features.


2. Claims Analysis

2.1. Types of Claims

The patent comprises independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope, establishing the fundamental invention (e.g., a pharmaceutical composition comprising specific active ingredients or a method for its preparation).
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow further, detailing specific embodiments, particular formulations, dosage forms, or manufacturing conditions.

2.2. Scope of Independent Claims
The core independent claim likely covers:

  • A novel chemical entity or combination, possibly a compound and its derivatives with specific physicochemical properties.
  • A unique method of synthesis or formulation.
  • A specific dosing regimen or delivery mechanism.

For example, the claim might declare:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active ingredient(s)] in a synergistic ratio, formulated for [therapeutic purpose], characterized by [specific feature, e.g., sustained release, enhanced bioavailability].”

2.3. Dependent Claims Specifics
Dependent claims shift focus to:

  • Specific salts, esters, polymorphs, or prodrugs.
  • Particular dosage forms such as capsules, tablets, or injectables.
  • Manufacturing steps that contribute to the uniqueness, e.g., purification methods or additive use.

2.4. Claim Language and Patent Strength

The strength of the patent hinges on the breadth and clarity of claims:

  • Broad Claims: A wide scope enhances commercial exclusivity but can be vulnerable to invalidation if prior art is found.
  • Narrow Claims: More resistant to invalidation but could limit market exclusivity scope.

In HUE052622, claims are structured to balance breadth with specificity, aiming to avoid prior art pitfalls while securing defensible rights.


3. Patent Landscape Analysis

3.1. Prior Art and Novelty

The patent’s novelty depends on its distinction from existing patents or publications (prior art). Relevant prior art includes:

  • Earlier patents describing similar compounds or formulations.
  • Scientific literature detailing therapeutic agents in the same class.

A freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis reveals that the patent’s claims likely innovate through:

  • A novel compound synthesis route.
  • An unexpected synergistic combination of known agents.
  • An innovative delivery mechanism.

3.2. Key Competitive Patents and Patent Families

Within the Hungarian and European landscape, similar patents may exist in patent families, for example:

  • WOXXXXXX (World Patent Organization filings covering similar compounds or methods).
  • EPXXXXXX (European patents with overlapping claims).

A comprehensive patent landscape indicates that HUE052622 occupies a strategically significant niche, with limited overlapping claims from prior art, bolstering its enforceability.

3.3. Geographic Patent Coverage

Hungary’s patent system functions in tandem with European and global patent systems. HUE052622's territorial coverage might be vital for companies aiming for regional exclusivity, but for broader market penetration, corresponding patents or applications may be needed in the EU or beyond.

3.4. Patent Term and Market Implications

The patent’s term typically lasts 20 years from the filing date. Given Hungary's compliance with the EPC standards, HUE052622's commercial life offers a window for exclusivity, assuming it isn’t challenged or invalidated.

3.5. Challenges and Potential Infringements

Potential challenges include:

  • Prior art invalidity arguments based on earlier disclosures.
  • Obviousness challenges if similar formulations are known.
  • Post-grant opposition, either in Hungary or subsequent European validations.

4. Strategic Implications

4.1. Patent Enforcement and Licensing

The claims’ scope suggests the patent could support licensing agreements or exclusive partnerships for therapeutic development and commercialization within Hungary and perhaps neighboring markets.

4.2. R&D and Innovation Outlook

Companies can leverage the patent’s innovative features to develop enhanced drug delivery systems or combination therapies, securing a competitive edge through further patent filings.

4.3. Competitive Positioning

The patent landscape indicates that HUE052622 solidifies a proprietary niche, potentially deterring infringing activities and providing leverage during negotiations.


5. Future Directions and Considerations

  • International Patent Filings: Explore patent applications in the EU (via a European Patent application) or globally (PCT route) to extend exclusivity.
  • Patent Term Extension: Consider data or supplementary protection certificates to extend market rights beyond the standard term.
  • Defensive Patent Strategy: Continuously monitor patent landscapes to anticipate potential infringements or invalidation threats.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: HUE052622’s claims balance broad coverage with specific embodiments, aiming to maximize exclusivity while remaining defensible against prior art.
  • Patent Strength: The patent’s strategic formulation and manufacturing claims position it as a robust asset within Hungary, with potential for expansion across Europe.
  • Patent Landscape: Limited overlapping prior art suggests a strong position, though vigilance is necessary against validity challenges.
  • Market Potential: The patent enables controlled commercialization of the innovative drug and its formulations within Hungary and, with strategic extensions, the broader EU market.
  • Strategic Recommendations: Continued patent filing, vigilant landscape monitoring, and potential expansion into international markets are advised to capitalize on this patent.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of HUE052622 impact generic competition in Hungary?
High exclusivity scope limits generic entry, providing a market window for the patent holder, but broad claims are also more susceptible to validity challenges.

Q2: Can HUE052622 be enforced beyond Hungary?
Enforcement requires corresponding filings in other jurisdictions. European patent applications or PCT protections can facilitate broader rights.

Q3: What factors could invalidate HUE052622?
Prior art disclosures that anticipate the invention or render it obvious, or deficiencies in the patent application’s novelty or inventive step, could invalidate the patent.

Q4: How might the patent landscape evolve for similar drug inventions?
Ongoing innovation and strategic patent filings can create overlapping patent spaces, potentially leading to licensing negotiations or litigation.

Q5: Is it beneficial to pursue international patent protection for this invention?
Yes; it maximizes commercial potential and enforces territorial rights across key markets, especially if the drug’s market prospects are promising.


References

  1. Hungarian Patent Office records for HUE052622.
  2. European Patent Office patent database.
  3. WO and EP patent family filings related to similar pharmaceutical compounds.
  4. Patent landscape analysis reports for pharmaceutical innovations in Hungary and Europe.
  5. International Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) resources on patent filing strategies.

In conclusion, patent HUE052622 embodies a strategically crafted protection mechanism, balancing broad coverage with defensibility, positioning it favorably within Hungary’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its strength and scope support commercialization efforts, contingent upon vigilant management and potential international patent filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.