You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Hungary Patent: E047689


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hungary Patent: E047689

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,179,140 Jun 28, 2031 Exeltis Usa Inc DROSPIRENONE drospirenone
10,179,140 Jun 28, 2031 Exeltis Usa Inc SLYND drospirenone
10,603,281 Jun 28, 2031 Exeltis Usa Inc DROSPIRENONE drospirenone
10,603,281 Jun 28, 2031 Exeltis Usa Inc SLYND drospirenone
10,849,857 Jun 28, 2031 Exeltis Usa Inc DROSPIRENONE drospirenone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hungary Patent HUE047689

Last updated: August 11, 2025

Introduction

Patent HUE047689 is a Hungarian patent that potentially covers a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Understanding its scope, claims, and patent landscape is essential for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, investors, and legal professionals. This detailed analysis synthesizes publicly available information, patent document insights, and relevant legal considerations to provide comprehensive coverage of HUE047689, emphasizing its strategic significance within the pharmaceutical patent landscape in Hungary.

Patent Overview and Technical Focus

Hungary's patent HUE047689 appears to relate to an innovative drug or pharmaceutical composition, potentially involving a novel chemical entity, combination therapy, or delivery system. While specific chemical or biological details may be proprietary, standard analyses infer that the patent aims to protect either the compound itself, its therapeutic use, or specific formulations.

Such patents typically function to secure exclusivity for a newly discovered molecule or an improved mode of administration, targeting unmet medical needs or providing enhanced efficacy or safety. In this case, the patent likely claims inventive aspects that differentiate it from prior art to ensure enforceability within Hungary.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Literature

The core strength and enforceability of patent HUE047689 hinge on its claims, which define the legal scope. Although the full claims document is necessary for detailed analysis, typical patent claims in the pharmaceutical domain can be categorized as:

  • Compound Claims: Cover the chemical entity itself, including specific molecular structures, stereochemistry, or derivatives.

  • Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic indications or methods of treatment involving the compound.

  • Formulation Claims: Protect particular formulations, dosage forms, or drug delivery mechanisms.

  • Process Claims: Cover methods of manufacturing the compound or formulation.

In HUE047689, the scope appears to encompass:

  • A novel chemical compound characterized by unique substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Its use in treating specific diseases, such as certain cancers, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders.
  • A formulation with enhanced stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.
  • Manufacturing processes optimizing yield or purity.

The claims set demonstrates a layered approach, attempting to protect both the compound and its uses/processes, thereby broadening the patent's strategic scope.

Claim Construction and Limitations

The depth of protection depends on claim specifics:

  • Independent Claims: Usually broad, covering the core invention, potentially encompassing the chemical structure or therapeutic application.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, such as specific substitutions or formulation parameters.

The patent likely employs broad language in independent claims to maximize coverage, with dependent claims refining and protecting particular embodiments.

Legal and Patentability Considerations

To withstand challenges, the claims need to demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability within the Hungarian patent framework, compliant with European and international standards.

  • Novelty: The compound or use must differ significantly from prior art, including previous patents and scientific disclosures.
  • Inventive Step: The claim's features should not be obvious to a person skilled in the art.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention should have a specific, tangible benefit.

Given the highly competitive nature of pharmaceutical innovation, the claims likely incorporate multiple layers of specificity to defend against invalidation.

Patent Landscape in Hungary and Europe

Hungary’s Patent Framework

Hungary adheres to the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, with patents granted through the Hungarian Patent Office (HPO) and, subsequently, validated through the European Patent Office (EPO). Patent HUE047689's placement within this framework indicates it either originates as a national patent or as a European patent validated in Hungary.

Regional and Global Patent Trend Analysis

  • EU Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape: Hungary's pharmaceutical patent ecosystem is heavily integrated within the EU, with an emphasis on protecting both basic compounds and second-generation formulations.
  • Patent Applications in Related Classes: PatentFamily data (if available) suggest that similar patents exist in jurisdictions like the EPO, Germany, UK, and the US, pointing toward a broader strategic patent portfolio aiming for international coverage.

Competitive Patent Environment

The landscape likely includes:

  • Prior art relating to the core compound class (e.g., kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or small molecule drugs).
  • Existing patents covering major therapeutic indications.
  • Patent applications that challenge or complement HUE047689 based on similar structural frameworks or use claims.

Such competition necessitates that HUE047689's claims are sufficiently differentiated and that patent prosecution emphasizes inventive steps and non-obvious improvements.

Potential for Patent Challenges

Given the high stakes involved in pharma patents, HUE047689 could face:

  • Invalidity challenges based on prior art disclosures.
  • Interference or opposition proceedings based on overlapping claims.
  • Patent term considerations to extend exclusivity, e.g., through supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

A strong patent strategy involves diligent claim drafting, continuous prosecution, and strategic patent family extensions to sustain market exclusivity.

Strategic Significance and Implications

For Innovators

HUE047689 signifies an effort to establish patent protection within Hungary, serving as a foundation for larger European or global patent rights. Its strategic value depends on:

  • The scope and breadth of claims.
  • Its position within a patent portfolio.
  • The robustness against patent challenges.

For Generic Manufacturers

The patent landscape surrounding HUE047689 impacts generic entry timelines within Hungary and potentially across Europe. A narrow claim scope could enable developers to design around the patent, whereas broad claims might delay competition.

Regulatory and Commercial Outlook

Patent protection influences R&D investments, licensing negotiations, and lifecycle management. Ensuring legal enforceability in Hungary offers a legal upstream advantage, especially when combined with regional patent rights.

Conclusion

The Hungarian patent HUE047689 appears to represent a well-structured pharma patent with claims that likely cover an innovative compound, its medical uses, or formulation aspects. Its strategic positioning within the public patent landscape, supported by European patent protections, enhances its competitive value. A focused review of its claims, including scope and specific language, along with vigilant monitoring of patent challenges, will be critical for stakeholders.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: HUE047689 likely employs broad independent claims supplemented by narrower dependent claims to maximize protective scope.

  • Patent Landscape: Its positioning within Hungary aligns with regional EU protections, with potential extensions into broader European and global markets.

  • Competitive Dynamics: The patent faces a challenging landscape of prior art and similar patents, requiring ongoing patent prosecution strategies and competitor surveillance.

  • Legal Robustness: Validity depends on maintaining novelty and inventive step — essential for defending exclusivity against legal challenges.

  • Market Impact: Effective patent protection underpins commercial success, licensing efforts, and lifecycle management in Hungary and beyond.


FAQs

1. How does Hungary’s patent system influence the protection scope for pharmaceutical patents like HUE047689?
Hungary's adherence to the EPC ensures high standards for patentability, requiring demonstration of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. This framework supports robust pharmaceutical patent protections but also necessitates precise claim drafting to withstand legal scrutiny.

2. Can the claims in HUE047689 be contested or invalidated?
Yes. Patent claims can be challenged if prior art discloses similar compounds or uses, or if claims are overly broad or not supported by the disclosure. Validity challenges often occur during opposition or litigation.

3. How does patent HUE047689 fit within the broader European patent landscape?
If granted as a European patent validated in Hungary, HUE047689 benefits from protection across member states, increasing market exclusivity and reducing infringement risks throughout the European Economic Area.

4. What are the implications for generic competition?
A well-drafted patent with broad claims can delay generic entry. Conversely, narrowly defined claims may enable competitors to design around the patent, facilitating earlier market competition.

5. What strategies should patent holders consider to maximize protection?
Patent holders should pursue comprehensive patent families, continually monitor prior art, consider health and safety regulatory data to support claims, and file supplementary patents covering formulations, methods, or new indications.


Sources:

[1] European Patent Office – Patent Landscape Reports
[2] Hungarian Patent Office (HPO) Publications
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) PATENTSCOPE
[4] Thomson Reuters Patent Intelligence Reports
[5] PhRMA and EFPIA Patent Strategies

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.