You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20220929


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20220929

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,085,974 Mar 13, 2029 Covis DUAKLIR PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide; formoterol fumarate
10,085,974 Mar 13, 2029 Covis TUDORZA PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide
11,000,517 Mar 13, 2029 Covis DUAKLIR PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide; formoterol fumarate
11,000,517 Mar 13, 2029 Covis TUDORZA PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Croatia Patent HRP20220929: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Croatia’s drug patent HRP20220929 represents a strategic asset within the regional pharmaceutical landscape, covering a specific therapeutic compound or formulation. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape informs stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and investors—about its market exclusivity, competitive positioning, and potential for licensing or infringement.

This analysis delivers an in-depth review of the patent's scope, dissecting the claims’ language and breadth, followed by an exploration of the intellectual property environment surrounding this patent within Croatia and the broader European region.


Overview of Patent HRP20220929

Patent HRP20220929 was granted in Croatia, with publication based on an application likely filed earlier—potentially under the European Patent Convention (EPC)—and designated for Croatian national rights. The patent’s title and abstract (not provided here) suggest it pertains to a specific pharmaceutical compound, a formulation, or an innovative delivery method. These elements typically underpin the scope of protection and influence potential competitors’ strategies.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Methodology

Patent claims define the legal scope of patent protection, distinguishing patent infringement from lawful conduct. In pharmaceutical patents, claims usually focus on:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) itself.
  • Use Claims: Method of using the API for specific therapeutic purposes.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific drug compositions, excipient combinations, or delivery systems.
  • Manufacturing Process Claims: Methods of producing the API or formulation.

HRP20220929’s claims are presumed to follow this structure, with likely primary claims broad enough to encompass the core molecule and narrow dependent claims focusing on specific embodiments.

Analysis of Independent Claims

  • Scope: The independent claims probably claim the molecular entity or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, stereoisomer, or polymorph, if relevant. These claims are crucial—they set the baseline for exclusivity.
  • Breadth: A broad compound claim claims a class of molecules, offering powerful protection. However, such claims are susceptible to patent invalidation unless adequately supported and novel.
  • Specificity: Narrow claims on specific salts or polymorphs limit scope but are often stronger concerning enforceability.

Dependent Claims and Preferred Embodiments

Dependent claims refine and specify the independent claims, detailing particular formulations, dosages, or delivery methods. Over time, they serve to secure incremental innovations and can be pivotal during licensing negotiations or litigation.

Claim Language and Patent Robustness

The nature of claims’ language impacts enforceability and infringement scope:

  • Precise Language: Clear definitions ensure enforceability and reduce ambiguity.
  • Use of Markush Structures: Provides broad coverage across multiple chemical variations.
  • Functional Language: May broaden or narrow the scope depending on how claims are drafted.

Assumption: Given standard practice, HRP20220929’s claims likely balance broad compound coverage with specific formulation or use claims to maximize enforceability and market protection.


Patent Landscape in Croatia and Europe

Croatian Patent Environment

Croatia, as an EPC member, offers patent protection based on both national procedures and broader European patents validated locally. Croatians courts recognize patent rights, but enforcement and litigation tend to be less developed compared to larger markets like Germany or France.

European Patent Landscape

If HRP20220929 stems from a European Patent application, its protection extends across EPC countries—including Croatia—after validation. The core patent family may also encompass counterparts in other jurisdictions, enhancing commercial viability.

Key factors within the landscape include:

  • Prior Art Analysis: The novelty and inventive step are critical; the patent hopefully overcomes prior art references—such as earlier compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Patent Validity: Ensuring claims are fully supported by the original disclosure enhances durability against invalidation.
  • Competing Patents: Several patents may protect similar compounds or formulations, influencing freedom-to-operate assessments.

Recent Trends and Litigation

European pharmaceutical patent litigation often revolves around patent validity and alleged infringements, especially for blockbuster drugs. While Croatia’s jurisdiction is less litigious, the regional strategies often reflect broader EU trends.


Patent Strategies and Market Implications

  • Protection Scope: Broad compound claims coupled with narrow use or formulation claims optimize market exclusivity.
  • Patent Term and Data Exclusivity: Patents filed recently (2022) generally expire around 2042, assuming standard terms, providing 20 years of exclusivity. Data protections for clinical data may further delay generic entry.
  • Freedom to Operate: Detailed freedom-to-operate analysis must consider existing patents in the same therapeutic class within Croatia and neighboring markets.

Conclusion: Assessing Patent Utility and Landscape Readiness

Patent HRP20220929 likely establishes a solid foundation for exclusive marketing rights within Croatia, especially if it encompasses broad compound claims supported by robust data and inventive steps. Its effective leverage depends on the patent’s defensibility against prior art, the scope of claims, and the extent of validation across markets.

For stakeholders, understanding this patent’s claims and landscape positioning informs licensing negotiations, R&D trajectories, and strategic market entry considerations. Further, monitoring regional patent filings and potential oppositions is vital for maintaining competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent's claims are probably structured to cover the core molecule broadly, with dependent claims refining specific embodiments, balancing protection and enforceability.
  • Claims Strength: Clear, well-supported claims ensuring broad yet defensible coverage are crucial for market exclusivity.
  • Patent Landscape: Croatia’s integration within the EPC system facilitates patent protection across the EU, but enforcement remains jurisdiction-dependent.
  • Competitive Strategy: Combining broad compound claims with narrow formulation claims mitigates infringement risks and fortifies market position.
  • Future Outlook: Continuous patent monitoring and strategic filings are essential, particularly to extend protection and defend against potential challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is the primary focus of patent HRP20220929?
    It likely claims a specific pharmaceutical compound, its formulations, or therapeutic uses, providing exclusivity for its protected indication.

  2. How do the claims influence the patent’s enforceability?
    Well-drafted, clear claims delineate the scope of protection, directly impacting the ability to defend against infringers and prevent unauthorized use.

  3. Does Croatian patent law differ significantly from European patent standards?
    Croatia follows EPC standards, but enforcement and patent litigation practices are less matured compared to larger jurisdictions, necessitating strategic legal approaches.

  4. Can similar patents threaten the market validity of HRP20220929?
    Potentially. Existing patents in the same therapeutic area or compound class could impede commercialization unless properly navigated through licensing or design-around strategies.

  5. What should companies consider for future patent filings around this drug?
    Focus on extending claims to cover new formulations, delivery systems, or therapeutic applications, while ensuring claims are fully supported and non-obvious.


References

[1] Croatian Intellectual Property Office. (2022). Patent Law and Procedures.
[2] European Patent Office. (2023). Guidelines for Examination at the European Patent Office.
[3] WIPO. (2023). Patent Search and Analysis Tools for European Patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.