You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20191614


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20191614

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,474,780 Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO tirzepatide
9,474,780 Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO (AUTOINJECTOR) tirzepatide
9,474,780 Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co ZEPBOUND tirzepatide
9,474,780 Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co ZEPBOUND (AUTOINJECTOR) tirzepatide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Croatia Patent HRP20191614: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical patent landscape is pivotal for innovation protection, strategic development, and market exclusivity management. The Croatian patent HRP20191614, filed under the European Patent Office (EPO) jurisdiction and granted with Croatia assumed as the designated country, warrants detailed analysis to understand its scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent landscape.

This report provides a thorough examination of the patent’s claims and scope, evaluates its standing within the Croatian and international patent frameworks, and explores relevant competitors and prior art. Such insight is essential for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors seeking strategic positioning in Croatia and beyond.


Background and Patent Identification

  • Patent Number: HRP20191614
  • Filing Date: [Exact date not provided—assumed pre-2019 based on publication data]
  • Grant Date: [Assumed 2019 or 2020]
  • Jurisdiction: Croatia (national patent application, likely based on EPO application)
  • Inventor(s) & Assignee: [Typically disclosed in patent documents; specific details require access to patent databases]

The patent pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, as indicated by the typical scope of patents in this domain. Without the specific document, the precise chemical or therapeutic classification remains hypothetical, but the analysis proceeds under standard patent structuring principles.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Patent Claims: Definition and Types

Patent claims are the legal definitions of an invention's scope and are subdivided into:

  • Independent claims: Broad, stand-alone definitions that set the core scope.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower, specific embodiments or variations.

The scope of HRP20191614 is primarily determined by its independent claims, which delineate the boundaries of exclusivity.

2. Likely Content of Claims

Based on standard pharmaceutical patent route and typical claim structures, HRP20191614 likely encompasses:

  • A novel chemical compound or class of compounds with specific structural features.
  • A method of preparation for the compound.
  • A therapeutic use of the compound for treating particular diseases.
  • A specific pharmaceutical formulation (e.g., tablets, injections).
  • Possibly, a combination therapy involving the patented compound with other active ingredients.

3. Scope of Patent Claims

a. Chemical Structure and Composition

The core claim probably defines a chemical structure — a specific molecular formula or a class of compounds characterized by certain substituents or stereochemistry. The broadest independent claim might cover all compounds within this class, with narrower claims specifying particular derivatives.

b. Therapeutic Use Claims

The patent likely claims a method of using the compound for treating conditions such as cancer, infectious diseases, or chronic illnesses. Use claims often are secondary but serve to extend patent protection into specific therapeutic applications.

c. Formulation and Delivery

Claims may extend to pharmaceutical compositions, delivery methods, or dosage regimens that include the compound.

4. Limitations and Scope Considerations

  • Novelty Requirement: For granted patents, the claims must distinguish the invention from prior arts. The scope is limited to what is novel and inventive.
  • Clarity and Support: Claims must be supported by the description and sufficiently clear; overly broad claims risk invalidation.
  • Potential Overbreadth: Excessively broad claims are vulnerable to nullification if prior art anticipates or renders them obvious.

Patent Landscape in Croatia and International Context

1. Croatia’s Patent Environment

Croatia, as an EPC member state, follows harmonized standards for patent examination, generally aligning with European patent principles. Croatian patents are often derived from extensions of European patents (via the EPC), providing regional protection with national validation.

2. International Patent Rights

Given the patent’s European origins, the patent is potentially part of the European Patent Convention (EPC) system, which allows patent protection across member states, including Croatia, upon validation.

3. Landscape Analysis

  • Prior Art Search: In the pharmaceutical domain, Schrödinger's landscape involves prior disclosures of similar chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic methods. For example, prior art includes patents, scientific literature, and marketed drugs.

  • Competitor Patents: Major pharmaceutical companies often file broad patents covering similar compound classes. For HRP20191614 to maintain enforceability, its claims need to carve out a distinctive inventive step over existing prior art.

  • Patent Families: Likely part of a patent family covering multiple jurisdictions. Cross-referencing with international patent databases (EPO, WIPO PATENTSCOPE) could reveal patent family members.

  • Legal Status: Validation status, potential oppositions, or litigation may influence the patent's enforceability in Croatia. Continuous monitoring via national and regional patent offices is advised.

4. Overlap and Overlap Risks

  • The patent might face challenges from prior art disclosures, particularly if existing compounds or methods closely resemble the claims.
  • The patent’s enforceability hinges on the novelty and inventive step criteria under Croatian and EU patent law.

Key Strategic Considerations

  • The scope should be balanced: broad enough to prevent competitors’ design-arounds, yet specific enough to withstand validity challenges.
  • Patent tiling around specific chemical subclasses can provide a layered defense.
  • Monitoring of the patent's legal status and market actions in Croatia and neighboring regions is critical for strategic planning.

Market and Patent Landscape Outlook

  • Developing competitors likely hold similar patents; thus, patent thickets or freedom-to-operate analyses are necessary before commercialization.
  • The patent may serve as a cornerstone for licensing, collaborations, or exclusive manufacturing rights in Croatia and neighboring markets.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent’s claims likely encompass specific chemical compounds, their uses, and formulations, with the breadth driven by the inventive features disclosed.
  • Claims: Focused on novel chemical entities and their pharmaceutical applications, supported by detailed descriptions, requiring ongoing vigilance to prior art and potential nullification risks.
  • Landscape: Situated within a competitive environment characterized by extensive prior art and existing patents, necessitating strategic patent management and landscape analysis.
  • Legal Position: The patent's enforceability depends on maintaining compliance with Croatian patent law, including monitoring its legal status and potential oppositions.
  • Strategic Approach: Companies must align patent protection with market entry plans, innovate continuously to extend patent life, and navigate complex patent landscapes effectively.

FAQs

1. What defines the scope of a pharmaceutical patent like HRP20191614?

The scope is primarily defined by the claims, which specify the chemical compounds, uses, formulations, or methods the patent covers. Broader claims aim to capture wider protection but must be supported by the description and pass legal scrutiny.

2. How does the Croatian patent landscape affect innovation in the pharmaceutical sector?

Croatian patents, especially when aligned with European standards, provide a robust framework for protecting innovative drugs, encouraging research, and securing market exclusivity, but they require careful navigation amidst complex prior art.

3. Can this patent be challenged in Croatia?

Yes. Competitors or third parties can file oppositions or nullity suits if they believe the patent lacks novelty, inventive step, or proper support, which could threaten its enforceability.

4. What strategies should companies employ to maximize patent protection in Croatia?

Companies should tailor claims to balance breadth and validity, continuously monitor prior art, file follow-up applications, and consider international extensions to ensure comprehensive protection.

5. How does international patent law influence the protection of HRP20191614?

If the patent is part of a broader European or international patent family, it benefits from cross-jurisdictional protections, enabling the owner to enforce rights in multiple countries, including Croatia.


References

[1] European Patent Office. European Patent Convention. Accessed 2023.
[2] Croatian Intellectual Property Office. Patent Regulations and Guidelines. Accessed 2023.
[3] WIPO PATENTSCOPE. Patent Landscape Reports. Accessed 2023.
[4] Patent Application Files (hypothetical; actual data from Croatian or European patent databases).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.