You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20170712


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20170712

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,871,761 Apr 4, 2031 Astellas VEOZAH fezolinetant
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Drug Patent HRP20170712

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Patent HRP20170712, filed in Croatia, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential implications in the treatment landscape. This analysis delineates the scope of the patent claims, scrutinizes strategic patenting considerations, and contextualizes its position within the broader drug patent landscape in Croatia and the European Union (EU). As Croatia's patent system aligns significantly with EU directives, understanding this patent’s jurisdictional implications aids stakeholders’ decision-making, encompassing innovators, generic manufacturers, and legal entities.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

HRP20170712 was filed in 2017, with the publication date likely in 2018. The patent application aims to secure exclusive rights over a novel pharmaceutical formulation, a specific therapeutic use, or a manufacturing process. While detailed claim language is not explicitly provided, typical insights derive from the abstract, application number, and related patent family documents.

Given Croatia's patent law (aligned with the European Patent Convention), the patent potentially covers:

  • Novel chemical entities or therapeutic combinations.
  • Innovative formulations or delivery systems.
  • Methodologies for producing the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Therapeutic use claims targeting specific disease indications.

Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Typical Structure of Claims

Croatia’s patent claims generally follow a hierarchical structure:

  • Independent claims articulate the broad inventive concept.
  • Dependent claims specify preferred embodiments or particular variations.

2. Types of Claims in HRP20170712 (Hypothetical)

Based on standard practice, the patent might include:

  • Composition Claims: Covering the pharmaceutical formulation, e.g., a combination of active ingredients in specified ratios.
  • Method Claims: Detailing manufacturing processes or therapeutic methods involving the drug.
  • Use Claims: Claiming the use of the drug in treating particular conditions (e.g., neurological disorders, cancers).
  • Device Claims: If delivery devices or delivery systems are involved.

3. Claim Scope and Breadth

  • Broad Claims: Aim to encapsulate the core inventive concept broad enough to prevent overlaps. For example, "a pharmaceutical composition comprising X and Y, for use in treating Z."
  • Narrow Claims: Focus on specific molecules, concentrations, or particular use cases.

The strength of the patent hinges on claim clarity and breadth—overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art exists, whereas overly narrow claims might allow competitors to circumvent protection.


Patent Landscape in Croatia for Similar Drugs

1. Patent Families and Related Filings

Croatia’s patent system often shares filings with European or international patent offices. It is practical to analyze whether HRP20170712 is part of a patent family with extensions under the European Patent Office (EPO), or whether it stands alone as a Croatian national patent.

  • European Patent System & Croatia: Since Croatia joined the EPO in 2002 and ratified the UPC agreement (though the Unitary Patent system has not yet been implemented), patentees often pursue European validation in Croatia.

  • Patent Families & Priority: The patent may be linked to earlier filings, such as PCT applications, that secure worldwide priority and enable strategic landscape positioning.

2. Competitor and Prior Art Landscape

  • Croatia's innovation environment includes several local and international pharmaceutical companies.
  • The landscape comprises patents related to biologics, small molecule drugs, biosimilars, and formulations.
  • The presence of blocking patents, especially in the therapeutic area of the claimed invention, influences the scope of freedom-to-operate.

3. Patent Gradation and Overlaps

  • Croatians courts and patent offices examine novelty and inventive step relative to prior art, including prior Croatian patents, European patents, and published applications.
  • Potential overlaps could involve existing patents in EU member states, impacting enforceability within Croatia.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

1. Patent Validity and Enforceability

  • The enforceability of HRP20170712 depends on correctness of filing, inventive step, and disclosure.
  • Croatian courts follow EPO standards, emphasizing prior art search and substantive examination.
  • The scope is vulnerable if prior art is discovered that predates the claim priority date.

2. Patent Term and Maintenance

  • The standard patent law grants a 20-year term from filing, subject to maintenance fees.
  • Patentholder strategies likely involve extending protection, possibly through supplementary protections or market exclusivity.

3. Competition and Patent Challenges

  • The drug landscape in Croatia is price-sensitive, especially with the entry of generics post-patent expiry.
  • Patent challenges could originate from generic manufacturers seeking invalidation via prior art or lack of inventive step.

Comparison with Broader EU Patent Landscape

Croatia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape mirrors broader EU trends:

  • Harmonization: EU regulation requires compliance with the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards.
  • Patent Cliffs: Many patented drugs face generic challenges after 10-15 years.
  • Data Exclusivity: Coupled with patent protection, data exclusivity shields clinical data for up to 8 years, influencing market dynamics.

While HRP20170712's specific claims determine its strength, the strategic importance lies in how it aligns with regional patent strategies, including potential validation through the EPO or national filings in adjacent jurisdictions.


Conclusion

HRP20170712’s scope hinges on the clarity and breadth of its claims, which typically encompass chemical compositions, manufacturing methods, and therapeutic indications. Its protection within Croatia is directly influenced by the novelty, inventive step, and prior art landscape. Given the integration of Croatian patent law within the EU framework, the patent's strength will be assessed based on meticulous legal criteria and strategic alignment with regional patent filing practices.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Clarity and Scope: The patent’s strength depends on well-drafted claims that balance breadth with validity, preventing easy circumvention.
  • Patent Family & Territorial Strategy: Securing regional patents through the EPO enhances protection and market leverage.
  • Landscape Awareness: Monitoring existing patents, especially in dominant therapeutic areas, is critical for patent validity and freedom to operate.
  • Regulatory & Market Dynamics: Understanding supplementary protection measures and market exclusivity regimes informs lifecycle management.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous patent validity assessments and strategic patent portfolio management are essential in Croatia's evolving pharmaceutical landscape.

FAQs

Q1. Can HRP20170712 be enforced independently in Croatia?
Yes, if it meets validity criteria—including novelty, inventive step, and proper drafting—it can be enforced via patent infringement proceedings in Croatian courts.

Q2. How does Croatia’s patent law impact patent protection for drugs?
Croatian patent law aligns with EPC standards, requiring thorough examination and granting 20-year protection, with allowances for supplementary patents and extensions through regional strategies.

Q3. Is it advantageous to file regional patents in Croatia?
Yes, protecting innovative drugs at the European level via the EPO provides broader enforcement capabilities within EU member states, including Croatia, and maximizes portfolio strength.

Q4. What are potential challenges to HRP20170712’s patent validity?
Prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or poor drafting can challenge validity, particularly if similar patents exist or if the claims are overly broad.

Q5. How does the patent landscape affect generic drug entry in Croatia?
A robust patent portfolio deters generic entry during exclusivity periods but becomes less effective once patents expire or are invalidated, fostering increased generic competition.


References

  1. Croatian Patent Law, Official Gazette of Croatia.
  2. European Patent Convention (EPC) 1973, as amended.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO), Guidelines for Examination.
  4. EMA Regulations on Data Exclusivity and Patent Protection.
  5. MarketReports.eu, Croatia Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.