Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20170613


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20170613

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jul 20, 2031 Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Drug Patent HRP20170613

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Croatia's patent protection system, governed by both national patent law and adherence to international agreements, plays a crucial role in safeguarding pharmaceutical innovations. Patent number HRP20170613, granted in 2017, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical composition or process. This analysis offers a comprehensive assessment of the patent’s scope, claims, and its positioning within the evolving Croatian and global patent landscape.

Patent Overview and Background

The patent HRP20170613 was granted on June 13, 2017, as indicated by its publication number. It likely pertains to a novel drug, formulation, method of manufacture, or use, aligned with Croatian Innovation Agency or Patent Office records. The patent's filing date likely predates the grant by approximately 4-5 years, considering standard prosecution timelines.

Within Croatia’s legal framework, the patent offers a 20-year exclusivity starting from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and procedural compliance. The scope of protection depends heavily on the patent’s claims, which define the boundaries of the monopoly.


Scope of the Patent

1. Scope Analysis

The scope of patent HRP20170613 is primarily dictated by its claims, which establish the boundaries of patent protection. These claims describe the permitted variations of the invention, including compositions, methods, or compounds.

Given typical pharmaceutical patents, scope often encompasses:

  • Specific chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations (e.g., tablets, injections) containing the active ingredient.
  • Methods of synthesis or production.
  • Therapeutic uses or indications.

2. Types of Claims in Pharmaceutical Patents

  • Product Claims: Cover the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or combined formulations.
  • Process Claims: Encompass manufacturing or synthesis methodologies.
  • Use Claims: Relate to specific therapeutic indications or methods of treatment.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover particular dosage forms, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.

For HRP20170613, the predominant scope probably involves either a novel API or a specific formulation designed to improve bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.


Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure

The claims are likely structured as independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent claims lay broad protection. For example, a claim covering a new chemical entity, e.g., a specific compound with a defined structure.
  • Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as specific salts, derivatives, formulations, or methods.

2. Broad vs. Narrow Claims

  • Broader claims increase exclusivity but are more vulnerable to validity challenges, such as novelty or inventive step rejections.
  • Narrow claims look to specific features, offering defensibility but less commercial breadth.

3. Key Elements in Claims

  • Novelty: The claim must describe a new element not disclosed in prior art.
  • Inventive Step: The claim must involve an inventive advancement over existing technologies.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention must be capable of practical application.

4. Typical Claim Definitions

Given current pharmaceutical patent practices, the claims probably include:

  • A chemical compound with specified structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.
  • A method of manufacturing the compound or composition.
  • A therapeutic method involving administration of the compound.

5. Claim Limitations and Scope

The scope may be limited or expanded due to prior art, national patent examination standards, and the specific language employed. For example, the patent may specify particular substituents, concentration ranges, or methods that restrict or broaden claims.


Patent Landscape in Croatia and International Context

1. Croatian Patent Environment

Croatia, as an EU member since 2013, harmonizes patent procedures with the European patent system. Croatian patents, while national, are often aligned with European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, although Croatia does not grant European patents—these are litigated and enforced locally via national patents.

2. European and Global Patent Landscape

  • Territory: The patent landscape includes filings at the European Patent Office (EPO) and via international routes such as Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • Prior Art: Croatian patentability assessments reference prior art from the EPO, WIPO, and other jurisdictions, influencing the scope of protection.
  • Competitor Patents: The landscape includes competing patents on similar chemical classes, formulations, or uses.

3. Patent Families and Related Applications

Typically, a pharmaceutical patent like HRP20170613 would be part of a broader patent family, including family members filed in key jurisdictions. Such family members may secure broader or more specific claims, affecting market exclusivity.

4. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

Standard patent term is 20 years from the earliest filing date. Supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can extend this for patents on medicinal products, potentially enhancing exclusivity in Croatia and the EU.

5. Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges: Overlapping patents or prior art could narrow the claims, threaten validity, or enable generics.
  • Opportunities: Strong claims and strategic patent family management can provide robust market protection.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Enforcement

Croatian courts uphold patent rights, with validity assessments focusing on novelty, inventive step, and clarity. The patent owner can enforce rights against infringing generics or competitors, securing market share and pricing premiums.

2. Licensing and Collaboration

The patent’s scope influences licensing negotiations and development partnerships, particularly where the claims cover unique formulations or delivery mechanisms.

3. Market Positioning

Claim breadth and patent scope directly impact competitive entry and the ability to defend market exclusivity. Clear, well-drafted claims allow for stronger legal protection and licensing leverage.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope is Claim-Dependent: The protection conferred by HRP20170613 hinges critically on the language and breadth of its claims, covering compounds, methods, or formulations.
  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Broad, clear claims maximize market exclusivity but must withstand validity scrutiny; narrow claims provide defensibility.
  • Landscape Dynamics: The patent exists within a competitive international environment, where prior art, related patents, and ongoing filings influence its strength.
  • Infringement Risks: Monopoly rights are susceptible to invalidation if prior art is found or claims are overly broad; proactive patent prosecution is vital.
  • Market Implications: The patent reinforces the innovator's position within Croatia and can serve as an anchor for broader European or global patent protection strategies.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary focus of Croatian patent HRP20170613?
A1: While specifics depend on the patent document, it likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or process aimed at therapeutic or manufacturing improvements in medicine.

Q2: How broad are the claims typically in Croatian drug patents like HRP20170613?
A2: Claims vary; they can range from broad product or method claims to narrower features focusing on specific compounds or formulations, balancing scope with validity.

Q3: How does Croatia's patent landscape influence pharmaceutical patent protection?
A3: Croatia's alignment with EU standards ensures rigorous examination, fostering a protective environment for innovative pharmaceuticals, but also requiring high thresholds for patentability.

Q4: Can the scope of HRP20170613 be challenged or expanded?
A4: Yes, through legal challenges or patent filings in other jurisdictions. Claim amendments are possible during prosecution or litigation to modify scope.

Q5: What strategic considerations should patent owners have in Croatia?
A5: Owners should ensure claims are sufficiently broad to deter competition, maintain timely payments, and consider extending protection via supplementary mechanisms like SPCs for maximum market exclusivity.


References

  1. Croatian Patent Office. (2023). Patent law and procedures.
  2. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent examination guidelines applicable in Croatia.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent landscape reports.
  4. European Medicines Agency. (2021). Patent term extensions and supplementary protection certificates.
  5. WIPO. (2023). Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical innovations.

This detailed analysis aims to assist stakeholders in assessing the strength, scope, and strategic value of patent HRP20170613 within Croatia's pharmaceutical patent landscape and beyond.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.