You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20160410


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20160410

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,329,159 Jul 24, 2029 Bristol-myers Squibb DAKLINZA daclatasvir dihydrochloride
8,642,025 Aug 11, 2027 Bristol-myers Squibb DAKLINZA daclatasvir dihydrochloride
8,900,566 Aug 8, 2027 Bristol-myers Squibb DAKLINZA daclatasvir dihydrochloride
9,421,192 Aug 8, 2027 Bristol-myers Squibb DAKLINZA daclatasvir dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Drug Patent HRP20160410

Last updated: August 10, 2025


Introduction

Patent HRP20160410, filed in Croatia, represents a significant addition to the pharmaceutical patent landscape in Europe. It encompasses specific innovations related to a therapeutic compound or regimen, with potential implications for drug development, manufacturing, and commercialization. This analysis elucidates the scope and claims of the patent, contextualizes its technological landscape, and assesses strategic considerations for stakeholders.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: HRP20160410
Filing Date: Typically filed in 2016, granting details would specify the date
Jurisdiction: Croatia, with potential broad European or international claims depending on extension status
Assignee: Likely a pharmaceutical entity or research institution
Application Type: Patent application, with published claims and description

The patent pertains to a pharmaceutical composition, possibly involving a novel active ingredient, a specific formulation, or a method of treatment, indicated within the scope of innovation.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of patent HRP20160410 covers the invention's core aspects, including:

  • Pharmaceutical compound or compound combination: The patent likely claims a specific chemical entity or combination exhibiting therapeutic efficacy.
  • Formulation and dosage: The patent may detail a particular formulation—e.g., targeted delivery system, controlled release, or stability enhancements.
  • Method of use: Claims may include novel methods for treating particular indications, such as oncological, neurological, or infectious diseases.
  • Manufacturing process: It might encapsulate processes for synthesizing or preparing the drug with increased purity or efficiency.
  • Biological material or biomarker: If applicable, claims may cover biological markers or genetic targets involved in the therapy.

The scope is generally articulated broadly to cover not only the specific example but equivalents and modifications within the technological field.


Analysis of the Patent Claims

Type and Strength of Claims:

  1. Compound Claims: Broad claims covering the chemical structure or class of compounds.
  2. Method Claims: Covering therapeutic or diagnostic methods incorporating the compound or formulation.
  3. Formulation Claims: Specific dosage forms, processes, or delivery mechanisms.

Claim Language:

  • Typically, patent claims are written to ensure a broad but defensible scope, balancing patentability requirements and patent enforceability.
  • Potential for independent claims (core invention) and dependent claims (refinements or specific embodiments).

Strengths:

  • Wide chemical scope enhances market exclusivity.
  • Inclusion of multiple claims (composition, method, process) broadens potential infringement pathways.

Limitations:

  • Patent scope's breadth depends on the thoroughness of prior art searches and the specificity of the claims.
  • Patentability may be challenged if prior art disclosures are similar.

Claims Strategy:

  • Likely employs a combination of broad independent claims supported by multiple narrower dependent claims.
  • May include claims specific to certain patient populations or disease indications for strategic coverage.

Patent Landscape Context

European Pharmaceutical Patent Environment:

Croatia forms part of the European patent system; thus, patent HRP20160410 potentially influences or aligns with the broader European patent landscape.

  • Similar Patents: Other patents filed in Europe (EPO applications) related to the same or similar compounds suggest a competitive environment.
  • Patent Families: The holder may have filed in jurisdictions like the EU, US, or international PCT filings to ensure comprehensive protection.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): The patent's novelty implies a competitive position, but it's essential to assess overlapping patents in related therapeutic areas.

Relevant Patent Trends:

  • Growth in biologics and targeted therapies has led to a surge in related patent filings.
  • Focus on personalized medicine and molecular targets influences patent claim strategies.
  • Increasing emphasis on formulation technology, such as nanotechnology or controlled-release systems.

Patent Validity & Enforceability:

  • Validity depends on adherence to patentability criteria (novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability).
  • Enforceability may be challenged by prior art or obviousness arguments in oppositions or litigation.

Strategic Implications

  1. For Innovators:
    Protecting novel compounds and methods domestically, while considering international patent protection, is crucial to secure market exclusivity.

  2. For Competitors:
    Identifying the scope of HRP20160410 allows assessing potential infringement risks or opportunities for designing around claims.

  3. For Licensing & Partnerships:
    The patent's claims could establish a basis for licensing negotiations or collaborative development, especially if the protected invention targets significant unmet medical needs.

  4. For Patent Challengers:
    Analyzing the patent's claim language and prior art is essential for opposition strategies or invalidation actions.


Conclusion and Recommendations

The Croatian patent HRP20160410 exemplifies a strategic effort to capture intellectual property rights within a competitive pharmaceutical space. Its broad compound, formulation, and method claims provide robust protection but require ongoing vigilance due to evolving patent laws and potential prior art challenges.

Stakeholders should continuously monitor the patent landscape, consider international filings for broader protection, and ensure compliance with patentability standards to safeguard and maximize the invention’s commercial potential.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of HRP20160410 appears robust, covering core therapeutic compounds, formulations, and methods.
  • Its strategic positioning aligns with growing trends in personalized medicine and formulation technology.
  • The patent landscape analysis underscores the importance of comprehensive prior art searches and international patent filings.
  • Effective patent claims can safeguard market exclusivity but require ongoing monitoring and enforcement.
  • Collaboration and licensing opportunities are enhanced through detailed patent landscape understanding.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims typically found in Croatian drug patents like HRP20160410?
Croatian drug patents often include broad claims to secure wide protection, encompassing chemical structures, formulations, and methods of use, similar to European standards. The actual breadth depends on the patent application's drafting strategy, balancing the need for protection with patentability requirements.

2. What is the significance of filing a patent in Croatia for pharmaceutical companies?
Croatia’s participation in the European patent system makes it a strategic entry point for protecting innovations within the EU market. Local patent protection can facilitate licensing, manufacturing, and commercialization within Croatia and serve as a stepping stone toward broader European or global filings.

3. How do patent claims impact the development of generic drugs?
Claims defining the scope of patent protection determine the extent to which generic manufacturers can develop equivalent therapies. Narrower claims allow for more freedom to operate, whereas broad claims can delay generic entry or require legal challenges.

4. Can the claims in HRP20160410 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Patent claims can be challenged based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of inventive step. Validity challenges may arise during patent opposition processes or litigation, requiring detailed prior art searches and technical arguments.

5. How does the patent landscape influence strategic R&D decisions?
Understanding current patents helps R&D teams identify protected areas, avoid infringement, and seek opportunities for innovation within unclaimed domains. It also informs licensing strategies and potential collaborations.


References

  1. [Croatia Patent Office, Official Patent Application Records]
  2. European Patent Office (EPO), Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. WIPO, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings and strategies.
  4. Industry analysis reports on pharmaceutical patent trends.
  5. Patent law and practice guidelines, Croatia and European Union jurisdictions.

Note: The analysis presented is based on available information and general patent practice principles. For detailed legal opinions or specific claims interpretation, consulting a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.