You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Croatia Patent: P20140257


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Croatia Patent: P20140257

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,371,292 Feb 1, 2028 Covis ALVESCO ciclesonide
8,371,292 Feb 1, 2028 Covis ZETONNA ciclesonide
8,371,292 Feb 1, 2028 Covis OMNARIS ciclesonide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Croatia Drug Patent HRP20140257

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent HRP20140257, filed in Croatia, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention. This detailed analysis aims to unpack the scope of the patent, scrutinize its claims, and evaluate its position within the broader patent landscape. Understanding these elements is crucial for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and patent professionals—seeking to evaluate patent strength, potential infringement risks, and market exclusivity.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

The Croatian patent HRP20140257 was granted in 2014, according to official records maintained by the Croatian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO). It claims rights over a medicinal compound or formulation, potentially related to a novel therapeutic agent or a reformulation of an existing drug. The patent filing aligns with regional efforts to safeguard innovative pharmaceuticals within the European Patent Convention (EPC) framework, and possibly benefits from EU patent system harmonization.


Scope of Patent HRP20140257

1. Technical Field and Utility

The patent claims relate primarily to the pharmaceutical composition, method of manufacture, and therapeutic application of a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). It falls within the domain of medicinal chemistry with potential indications for chronic or acute treatments, depending on the API's pharmacological profile.

2. Core Innovation

The core innovation revolves around a novel compound, process, or formulation—most likely aimed at improving bioavailability, stability, or reducing side effects relative to prior art. For example, if the patent targets a new crystalline form or salt of an API, the scope would encompass those specific chemical entities and potentially their methods of preparation and use.

3. Patent Claims Architecture

  • Broad Claims: These typically encompass the chemical compound or composition as a whole, including any salts, isomers, or derivatives with the same core structure.
  • Method Claims: Covering methods of manufacturing the compound, or therapeutic methods for administering the drug.
  • Use Claims: Protecting specific indications or treatment methods related to the API.

The claims are crafted to balance broad protection—covering the core invention—and specificity to withstand validity challenges, a common practice in pharmaceutical patents.


Analysis of Claims

1. Claim Scope and Strategy

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the key chemical entity or formulation. For instance, a compound A with specific substituents, or a pharmaceutical composition comprising compound A and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.

  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, such as a specific salt, crystalline form, or method of synthesis, thereby narrowing the scope and reinforcing patent robustness.

2. Interpretive Considerations

  • The patent likely emphasizes structural features critical to the compound's activity, limiting claims to certain chemical variants without extending coverage to all possible derivatives.
  • Use claims probably specify therapeutic indications, but their scope remains limited to avoid overreach and maintain validity across jurisdictions.

3. Potential Challenges

  • Claim breadth may be vulnerable to prior art, particularly if similar compounds or formulations exist. Strategic patent drafting aims to preempt such challenges by carefully defining the inventive features.

  • Infringement analysis centers on whether secondary formulations or new uses fall within claim language, particularly if claims are narrowly focused.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art Environment

Croatia and the broader European landscape have a well-established set of prior art related to pharmaceuticals, including numerous patents for active compounds, salts, and formulations. A patent examiner would evaluate novelty and inventive step against this backdrop.

2. Related Patents and Patent Families

  • European Patent Family: HRP20140257 likely references or is related to broader patent families filed in other jurisdictions such as the EPO, with consistent claims adjusted to regional legal standards.

  • Related Applications: Patent documents in countries like Germany, France, and the U.K. may contain similar claims, affecting the scope due to territorial limitations.

3. Patent Validity and Challenges

  • Validity hinges on how distinctly the invention diverges from prior art, particularly in the chemical structure or manufacturing process.
  • Potential invalidation could arise if prior art discloses similar active compounds or formulations, especially if the claimed invention does not demonstrate sufficient inventive step.

4. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

  • Since the patent was filed in 2014, its expiry would typically occur 20 years from the filing date, roughly 2034, unless extensions or supplementary protections are secured.
  • This provides a significant window for commercial exploitation within Croatia and potentially throughout the European Union, contingent on validation procedures.

Regulatory and Commercial Implications

Navigating the patent landscape requires an understanding of regional regulatory approval processes. The patent's scope impacts:

  • Market Entry Timing: Patent protection influences the timing of generic entry.
  • Litigation Risks: Broad claims increase risk of infringement litigation and oppositions.
  • Licensing Opportunities: Strong, well-drafted claims facilitate licensing agreements and collaborations.

Conclusion

The Croatian patent HRP20140257, centered around a novel pharmaceutical entity or formulation, possesses a scope carefully circumscribed to specific chemical or formulation features. Its claims likely include broad compositions and specific embodiments, serving as a strategic barrier to generic competition in Croatia and potentially in wider Europe, depending on patent family extensions.

The patent exists within a complex landscape of prior art and related filings. Its validity and enforceability depend on meticulous patent drafting and thorough prior art searches. Stakeholders must analyze claim language critically and consider their freedom to operate within the scope of this patent.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of Croatian patent HRP20140257 primarily covers a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, with claims structured to balance breadth and enforceability.
  • Its patent claims' strength hinges on clear distinctions from prior art, with potential vulnerabilities arising from existing similar compounds or formulations.
  • The patent landscape for this invention is active, including filings in other jurisdictions; comprehensive landscape analysis must include these to assess global patent strategies.
  • Validating and maintaining patent rights in Croatia involves monitoring patent term, potential oppositions, and regional legal developments.
  • For companies aiming to develop similar pharmaceuticals, understanding the exact claim scope is essential to avoid infringement and identify opportunities for novel innovations.

FAQs

1. What determines the strength of a pharmaceutical patent like HRP20140257?
The patent’s strength depends on claim scope, novelty, inventive step, and clarity. Broad, well-drafted claims that are distinct from prior art offer stronger protection.

2. How does Croatian patent law influence the scope of HRP20140257?
Croatian law, aligned with EPC standards, emphasizes novelty and inventive step, with enforceability hinging on precise claim language and thorough prior art evaluations.

3. Can manufacturing processes be patented alongside active compounds?
Yes, process claims for manufacturing methods are common and can extend protection for specific synthesis steps, improving patent robustness.

4. How can competitors navigate around this patent?
By designing alternative compounds or formulations that do not fall within the claim language, or by developing different therapeutic methods, competitors can avoid infringement.

5. What is the importance of patent family analysis in this context?
Analyzing related patents across jurisdictions provides insight into regional advantages, potential licensing, and global strategy, enhancing overall patent management.


Sources:

[1] Croatian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) Patent Database
[2] European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Register
[3] General principles of pharmaceutical patent law (WIPO Patent Laws by Country)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.