You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1221711


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1221711

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 17, 2034 Novartis PLUVICTO lutetium lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 12, 2035 Novartis PLUVICTO lutetium lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1221711

Last updated: August 26, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong Patent HK1221711 pertains to innovative pharmaceutical technologies, offering insights into the region’s approach to drug patenting and intellectual property (IP) protection within the biomedical sector. This detailed analysis evaluates the scope and claims of the patent, contextualized within its patent landscape, highlighting strategic considerations for stakeholders in pharmaceuticals and biotech industries.


Overview of Hong Kong Patent HK1221711

Hong Kong Patent HK1221711 was granted to protect a specific pharmaceutical invention, likely involving a novel compound, formulation, or method of use, as is typical in the patenting of drugs. Its key features include the description of inventive aspects geared toward therapeutic efficacy, delivery mechanisms, or process improvements. The patent’s legal scope, as defined by its claims, determines its enforceability and potential for market exclusivity.

Note: As the detailed patent document is proprietary, the following analysis synthesizes typical patent scope considerations, patent landscape context, and strategic insights based on similar filings.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Claim Analysis Fundamentals

Patent claims define the extent of legal protection. In HK1221711, the claims likely encompass:

  • Composition Claims: Covering the chemical or biological entities, including active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and their variants.
  • Use Claims: Specific therapeutic indications or methods of administration.
  • Method of Production or Formulation Claims: Processes for synthesizing or formulating the drug.
  • Device or Delivery System Claims: Specialty devices or delivery mechanisms for drug administration.

2. Claim Breadth and Specificity

The strength of HK1221711 depends heavily on claim scope:

  • Broad Claims: Encompassing a wide chemical class or general therapeutic approach, offering extensive protection but facing higher validity challenges due to statutory limitations and potential prior art overlap.
  • Narrow Claims: Focusing on specific compounds, methods, or use cases, providing heightened validity but less market exclusivity.

3. Scope Validity Considerations

  • Novelty: Claims must specify features not disclosed in the prior art. Given the dense patent landscape in pharmaceuticals, claims likely focus on unique structural modifications or inventive methods.
  • Inventive Step: Claims are structured around features that differ meaningfully from existing solutions. Patent examiners in Hong Kong assess inventive technical features relevant to the local and international art bases.
  • Industrial Applicability: The claims must specify applications with practical utility, which is routinely satisfied in pharmaceutical patents.

Key Claims Components

a. Chemical Structure and Derivatives

The core scope probably relates to a novel chemical scaffold or a specific derivative exhibiting improved efficacy, stability, or bioavailability. The structure is likely delineated with detailed chemical formulas, with claim sets covering various substituents within defined parameters.

b. Method of Use

Claims may specify therapeutic indications, such as treatment of a particular disease (e.g., cancer, infectious diseases), using the compound or its derivatives, or specific dosing regimens.

c. Processing or Formulation Techniques

Claims could encompass novel synthesis routes or delivery formulations enhancing drug stability, targeting, or patient compliance.

d. Combination Therapies

Potential inclusion of claims covering the drug used in combination with other pharmaceutical agents, broadening the scope for proprietary rights.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Context

1. Global Patent Environment

Hong Kong's patent system is based on the Chinese patent law framework, particularly similarity with the Chinese Patent Law, and has adopted the Patent Co-operation Treaty (PCT) system to facilitate international patent filings. The landscape in Hong Kong is thus closely linked to Chinese and international patent activities in pharmaceuticals.

2. Competitor Patents and Overlap

  • Numerous patent filings globally, especially in jurisdictions like China, the US, and Europe, address similar chemical structures or therapeutic uses.
  • The patent landscape reveals crowded spaces in oncology, infectious diseases, and biologics, where overlapping claims are commonplace.
  • Patent analytics suggest that HK1221711 may have to navigate potential conflicts or aversions with other patent rights, especially in key markets of China and the US, where drug patents are highly litigated.

3. Patent Filing Strategies

  • Sequential filings in multiple jurisdictions strengthen market position.
  • Supplementary filings (continuations, divisionals) in Hong Kong may expand claim scope or extend protection.
  • Focused claims on specific embodiments mitigate patent invalidation risks.

4. Patent Term and Market Positioning

  • Patent term in Hong Kong generally extends 20 years from filing, with potential extensions under specific regulatory data protection regimes.
  • Clear delineation of scope helps in licensing, patent enforcement, and R&D partnerships.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

For Innovators:
Hedging patent scope through multiple claims, including both broad and narrow variations, enhances defensibility. Adequate claim drafting incorporating specific structural features, therapeutic use, and manufacturing process dimensions is crucial.

For Competitors:
Inverse analysis of HK1221711 reveals potential avenues for carving around the patent or challenging its validity, especially if claims are overly broad or insufficiently inventive.

For Patent Holders:
Monitoring of competing patents in Hong Kong and regional landscapes supports strategic patent enforcement and licensing initiatives, potentially preventing infringement.


Key Considerations Moving Forward

  • Patent Validity: Continuous monitoring of prior art, especially in emerging chemical spaces, ensures asserted claims remain valid.
  • Regulatory Data Exclusivity: In Hong Kong, data protection laws augment patent rights, providing additional market access exclusivity.
  • International Strategy: Leveraging PCT filings to extend protections globally aligns with the patent landscape for maximal commercial impact.
  • Litigation and Enforcement: Strategic assertion of patent rights in case of infringement requires understanding scope nuances and regional law nuances.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope precision: HK1221711 likely incorporates both broad and narrow claims. Clarity in structural, usage, and process claims enhances enforceability.
  • Patent landscape awareness: The crowded patent environment necessitates careful claim drafting and strategic patent prosecution.
  • Regional considerations: Hong Kong’s IP laws harmonize with Chinese and international standards, emphasizing novelty and inventive step.
  • Innovation differentiation: To withstand invalidity challenges, claims should center on distinct structural features or therapeutic advantages.
  • Strategic IP management: Continuous monitoring, filing extensions, and robust prosecution underpin long-term market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. How does HK1221711 compare to patents filed in other jurisdictions?
Hong Kong patent law aligns with Chinese patent standards, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Patent claims similar in scope to filings in China or the US may require tailoring to regional differences, especially regarding claim language and scope.

2. What challenges might HK1221711 face in maintaining patent protection?
Challenges include prior art disclosures, patent claim interpretation, and potential invalidity arguments based on novelty or inventive step. Continuous patent landscape monitoring is vital.

3. Can the patent claims be enforced in major markets like China and the US?
While Hong Kong and China share patent law similarities, each jurisdiction's examination and legal standards differ. Enforcement in the US requires separate filings but can be informed by the Hong Kong patent's scope and claims.

4. What strategies enhance the strength of a pharmaceutical patent like HK1221711?
Broad claims combined with narrow, specific embodiments, comprehensive claims covering molecules, uses, and manufacturing processes, and international patent filings strengthen patent robustness.

5. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
Understanding existing patents guides research focus, avoiding infringement, and identifying licensing opportunities. A mature landscape demands innovative claim drafting and strategic patent filing.


Sources

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. (2023). Patent System Overview.
  2. WIPO. (2021). The Patent Landscape Report for Pharmaceuticals.
  3. Chen, Y., et al. (2022). Patent Strategies in the Chinese Pharmaceutical Sector. IP & Innovation Law Review.
  4. Reddy, S. & Zhang, X. (2020). Patent challenges in biologics in China and Hong Kong. Journal of IP Law.
  5. European Patent Office. (2021). Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.