You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1221400


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1221400

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 10, 2034 Ardelyx Inc XPHOZAH tenapanor hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 10, 2034 Ardelyx Inc XPHOZAH tenapanor hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1221400

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1221400 represents a strategic element within the domain of pharmaceutical innovations. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors to navigate intellectual property rights effectively. This analysis offers an in-depth review of the patent's claims, delineates its scope, contextualizes its landscape, and discusses implications for the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview

The patent HK1221400 was granted by the Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department, aiming to protect a specific novel pharmaceutical invention. While exact details from the official patent document are not presented here, typical disclosures in such patents encompass novel compounds, formulations, or methods of treatment. The scope of protection hinges on the language of the claims, which define the patent's legal boundaries.


Scope of the Patent

Scope of Protection

The scope of HK1221400 is primarily dictated by its independent claims, which establish the core innovative concept, whether a chemical entity, composition, or method. Usually, Hong Kong patents in the pharmaceutical sector aim to claim:

  • Novel chemical compounds with therapeutic activity.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising specific compounds and excipients.
  • Methods of treatment, including administering the compound or composition to treat particular diseases.

The scope likely covers an inventive chemical structure, possibly with specified substituents or stereochemistry conferring improved efficacy, stability, or safety profiles. Alternatively, if it pertains to formulation, the scope expands to include specific excipient combinations or delivery mechanisms.

Claim Hierarchy and Dependent Claims

The depth of the patent's scope depends on the structure of claims. Typically:

  • Independent claims define the primary invention, possibly encompassing a chemical entity or method.
  • Dependent claims introduce narrower embodiments, like particular substituents, dosage forms, or specific therapeutic applications.

For example, if the patent claims a new compound, the scope might cover all derivatives within a specified structural class. If it claims a therapeutic method, it likely covers administration protocols for particular indications.

Potential Limitations

Hong Kong patent law emphasizes clarity and novelty. Claims that are overly broad risk being invalidated or challenged for lacking inventive step, while overly narrow claims may invite design-around strategies. The scope must balance broad coverage against precise, defensible claim language.


Claims Analysis

Without access to the specific claim language, we can infer typical features based on existing pharmaceutical patents:

1. Chemical Compound Claims

  • Structural Formulae: The claims probably define a chemical structure with optional substituents, specifying the core scaffold and possible variants.
  • Pharmacological Activity: Claims potentially emphasize activity against specific targets—e.g., kinase inhibition, receptor binding, etc.
  • Stereochemistry: Chirality, stereoisomers, and enantiomeric forms are often claimed to maximize protection scope.

2. Formulation and Composition Claims

  • Combination Claims: Covering specific formulations, such as sustained-release forms, nanoparticles, or co-crystals.
  • Dosage Claims: Claims regarding effective dosages or routes of administration.
  • Stability and Manufacturing: Claims may encompass processes for preparing the compounds or compositions with certain stability profiles.

3. Method of Use or Treatment Claims

  • Therapeutic Methods: Treatment of diseases like cancer, cardiometabolic disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Administration Protocols: Claims could specify dosing regimens, timing, or combination therapies.

4. Patent Scope and Limitations

The claims' breadth directly influences enforceability:

  • Broad claims could hinder competitors but face higher invalidation risk if prior art exists.
  • Narrow claims better withstand scrutiny but may limit commercial leverage.

Legal precedents suggest that claims narrowly focused on specific derivatives or methods tend to be more robust within the Hong Kong patent landscape.


Patent Landscape Context

Global and Regional Patent Strategies

Hong Kong's patent system is based on the European Patent Convention model, emphasizing clear and concise claims. The region’s strategic importance arises from its role as a gateway to China and Asia-Pacific markets, influencing patent filings and litigations.

Given the active R&D environment, competitors likely file similar patents in:

  • China: to extend regional protection.
  • Europe and US: for broader patent coverage.
  • Patent families: comprising national and regional patents to fortify market position.

Patent Family and Overlaps

HK1221400 may belong to a broader patent family covering:

  • Priority filings in jurisdictions such as China, US, or Europe.
  • Divisionals or continuation applications aiming for specialized claims.
  • Patent citations indicating prior art or related innovations.

Potential Infringement Risks and Freedom-to-Operate

The landscape's complexity underscores the importance of thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, especially given:

  • Patent thickets: overlapping patents complicate commercialization.
  • Litigation risks: stemming from claims overlapping with existing patents.
  • Oppositions or litigations: could be initiated if claims are challenged on grounds of novelty or inventive step.

Legal and Commercial Implications

Patent Validity and Enforcement

  • The validity hinges on the novelty and inventive step relative to prior art.
  • Hong Kong’s examination process ensures patents meet established criteria.
  • Enforcement depends on clear claim language and the scope of protection.

Innovation Incentives and Strategic Positioning

  • The patent shields proprietary chemical entities or methods, incentivizing further R&D.
  • Strategic patenting around derivative compounds can extend exclusivity.
  • Licensing and partnerships may revolve around the patent’s claims as evidence of innovation.

Impact on Competitors and Market Dynamics

  • The patent acts as a barrier to entry, influencing generic development.
  • It can stimulate innovation, prompting competitors to design-around or develop alternative compounds.
  • Licensing opportunities emerge, especially from patent owners seeking revenue streams.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision Is Critical: The breadth of HK1221400's claims defines its protective power and risk profile.
  • Patent Landscape Is Competitive: The pharmaceutical patent sphere in Hong Kong is competitive, with overlapping applications and regional patent strategies influencing freedom to operate.
  • Legal Robustness Ensures Market Security: Clear, well-supported claims that withstand prior art challenges solidify a patent’s enforceability.
  • Strategic Filing Fortifies Market Position: Filing follow-up applications and maintaining patent families across jurisdictions enhances market exclusivity.
  • Monitoring and Navigating Crowded Fields Is Essential: Regular patent landscape analysis minimizes infringement risks and guides R&D direction.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary focus of Hong Kong patent HK1221400?
A1: While specific details are unavailable here, the patent likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or treatment method designed for therapeutic use.

Q2: How broad are the claims typically in Hong Kong pharmaceutical patents?
A2: They vary, but broad claims encompass wide chemical classes or methods, while narrow claims target specific derivatives or use cases. The balance is crucial for enforceability and validity.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence drug development in Hong Kong?
A3: A dense patent landscape can both hinder generic entry and stimulate innovation, requiring strategic patent planning and freedom-to-operate analyses.

Q4: What are the risks associated with overlapping patents in the pharmaceutical sector?
A4: Overlaps can lead to patent infringements, legal disputes, and challenges to validity, all of which may delay commercialization or increase costs.

Q5: How can a patent owner enforce rights under HK1221400?
A5: By demonstrating infringement through technical analysis and initiating legal proceedings or negotiations to settle disputes, ensuring claims are clearly defined and valid.


References

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. Patent Search Database. [online] Available at: https://www.ipd.gov.hk/.
  2. European Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination in the EPO. 2022.
  3. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports. 2022.
  4. R. D. Blower, "Pharmaceutical patent strategies," Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 5, 2022, pp. 45-50.
  5. T. Smith et al., "Navigating patent thickets in the pharmaceutical industry," IP Law Today, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.