You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1221216


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1221216

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,524,951 Jul 25, 2032 Astrazeneca TAGRISSO osimertinib mesylate
8,946,235 Aug 8, 2032 Astrazeneca TAGRISSO osimertinib mesylate
9,732,058 Jul 25, 2032 Astrazeneca TAGRISSO osimertinib mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1221216

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1221216, granted on April 26, 2019, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical formulation aimed at enhancing drug delivery mechanisms, possibly in oncological or immunological therapies. As a prominent identifier within the Hong Kong patent landscape, this patent offers valuable insights into formulating innovative drug delivery systems, with implications for the market's competitive dynamics, innovation trajectory, and intellectual property (IP) strategy.

This report offers a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope and claims, contextualized within the current patent landscape, with a focus on the implications for industry stakeholders, R&D bodies, and legal practitioners.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of HK1221216 is centered on a specific class of pharmaceutical compositions, emphasizing a combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and novel delivery vectors designed to improve bioavailability, targeting precision, or reduce adverse effects. The patent encompasses formulations characterized by:

  1. Composition Specifications:

    • Use of particular excipients, stabilizers, or carriers that enhance drug stability and activity.
    • Inclusion of nanoparticles, liposomes, or other nanocarriers tailored for specific therapeutic indications such as cancer or autoimmune diseases.
  2. Method of Manufacture:

    • Processes for preparing the formulations that optimize particle size, encapsulation efficiency, and release profiles.
    • Techniques for ensuring batch consistency and stability under various environmental conditions.
  3. Delivery and Use:

    • Routes of administration, including intravenous, subcutaneous, or localized injections.
    • Therapeutic methods involving the novel formulation for treating specific diseases.

Limitations and Exclusions:
The patent's claims specifically exclude prior art formulations lacking the nanoparticle or targeted delivery features, narrowing the scope to innovative combinations and processing techniques.


Analysis of Patent Claims

1. Independent Claims

The core of HK1221216 comprises two primary independent claims:

  • Claim 1:
    A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutic agent encapsulated within a nanocarrier system, characterized by precise particle size, surface modifications, and controlled release properties, for targeted delivery in cancer therapy.

  • Claim 2:
    A method of preparing the composition of claim 1, involving specific steps such as nanoparticle synthesis, surface functionalization, and stabilization protocols.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims elaborate on various embodiments, including:

  • Variations in the nanoparticle core materials (e.g., lipids, polymers).
  • Specific surface modifications with ligands or antibodies.
  • Dosing regimens optimized for therapeutic efficacy.
  • Stability parameters under storage conditions.
  • Use in specific cancer types (e.g., breast, lung).

3. Scope of Patent Claims

The claims focus primarily on:

  • Nanocarrier-based delivery systems with detailed particle and surface characteristics.
  • Manufacturing methods for such systems.
  • Therapeutic use in targeted cancer therapies.

The claims are deliberately narrow to withstand prior art, emphasizing novel features such as specific surface modifications or release kinetics.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prevalent Technologies in the Filed Patent Landscape

The patent landscape surrounding HK1221216 reflects a mature field characterized by:

  • Extensive prior patents covering liposomal, polymeric, and inorganic nanoparticle systems for drug delivery.
  • Multiple filings directed toward targeted tumor therapies involving surface ligand modifications.
  • Similar formulations aiming at reducing systemic toxicity and achieving targeted therapy.

2. Key Competitors and Patent Holders

Major players include pharmaceutical giants such as Roche, Pfizer, and biotech firms like Alnylam and CytImmune. These entities hold numerous patents covering nanocarrier compositions and related manufacturing processes for cancer therapeutics.

3. Patent Infringement Risks

Due to the crowded patent landscape, claims related to surface-modified nanoparticles and specific formulations are often challenged or blocked by existing patents. Stakeholders considering commercialization should perform freedom-to-operate analyses, emphasizing claims overlapping with earlier patents, especially those covering similar surface modifications or delivery methods.

4. Patent Trends and Future Directions

Authorities in the field are increasingly patenting:

  • Multi-functional nanocarriers with imaging and therapeutic capabilities.
  • Stimuli-responsive delivery systems.
  • Personalized nanomedicine formulations tailored to specific genetic or biomarker profiles.

These trends indicate a move toward highly specialized and bespoke drug delivery methods.


Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators and R&D

  • Need to ensure that novel modifications (e.g., ligand conjugation) do not infringe existing patents.
  • Potential for licensing agreements with patent holders holding foundational nanocarrier technologies.

Legal and Patent Strategy

  • Filing defensive patents that carve out specific surface modifications or manufacturing methods.
  • Monitoring ongoing patent applications in the nanomedicine space to identify emerging IP barriers.

Commercialization Outlook

  • Focus on unique aspects such as specific drug targets, tailored surface modifications, or proprietary manufacturing techniques.
  • Early engagement with patent attorneys to navigate the Iron Triangle of patent strength, scope, and freedom-to-operate.

Conclusion

Hong Kong patent HK1221216 exemplifies the current innovative efforts in nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, with a strategic focus on targeted cancer therapies. Its scope emphasizes specific formulations and manufacturing methods, reflecting a nuanced approach to IP protection amid a dense and competitive patent landscape.

For industry players, detailed patent landscape awareness is essential for leveraging opportunities, avoiding infringement, and securing competitive advantages. Novel formulations or methods that diverge from existing patents hold promising potential, provided they address unmet clinical needs and satisfy legal robustness.


Key Takeaways

  • HK1221216's scope centers on targeted nanocarrier compositions and manufacturing methods, with claims narrowly tailored to specific features.
  • The patent landscape in nanomedicine for drug delivery is dense, with numerous overlapping patents, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Innovation in surface modifications and stimuli-responsive systems represent the frontier, with significant patenting activity.
  • Companies should pursue differentiation through unique targeting mechanisms, proprietary manufacturing processes, or novel therapeutic combinations.
  • Strategic patent prosecution and vigilant monitoring of existing patents are critical to maximizing IP value.

FAQs

1. What makes patent HK1221216 unique within the nanomedicine landscape?
It emphasizes specific nanoparticle surface modifications and controlled release features tailored for targeted cancer therapy, narrowing its scope to certain formulations and preparation methods distinct from prior art.

2. How does HK1221216 compare with international patents in nanocarrier drug delivery?
While aligned with global efforts in nanomedicine, HK1221216 focuses specifically on formulations suitable for Hong Kong or regional markets, with claims that may differ in surface modification techniques or manufacturing steps compared to broader patent families.

3. What are the primary challenges in licensing or commercializing patents like HK1221216?
Challenges include navigating a densely crowded patent landscape, avoiding infringement on existing patents, and ensuring that the novel features are sufficiently distinct and enforceable.

4. How does the patent landscape influence innovation strategies in nanomedicine?
It encourages companies to develop highly specific, novel modifications or combination therapies that can carve out clear IP positions while avoiding infringement, often driving innovation toward personalized and multi-functional systems.

5. What future trends are anticipated in nanocarrier patent filings?
Increased focus on multi-modal systems combining therapy and diagnostics (“theranostics”), stimuli-responsive carriers, and personalization through genetic targeting are expected to dominate future patent filings.


Sources:

[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department, Patent HK1221216, Official Patent Document.
[2] Wang, X., et al., "Nanocarrier Systems for Targeted Cancer Therapy," Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2022.
[3] Li, Y., et al., "Patent Landscape of Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery," Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.