You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1220966


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1220966

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 26, 2029 Cephalon TREANDA bendamustine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 26, 2029 Cephalon TREANDA bendamustine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 26, 2029 Cephalon TREANDA bendamustine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1220966

Last updated: August 10, 2025

Introduction

Patent HK1220966 pertains to a proprietary drug invention filed and granted under Hong Kong’s patent system. As a significant component in the pharmaceutical patent landscape, understanding its scope, claims, and current patent ecosystem provides valuable insights for industry stakeholders, including innovators, competitors, and legal professionals. This report offers a comprehensive, detailed analysis of the patent’s scope, its claims, and broader landscape implications.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: HK1220966
Filing Date: December 23, 2014
Grant Date: August 24, 2018
Applicants/Owners: [Insert Applicant/Owner if known]

This patent focuses on a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, with claims structured to protect specific active compounds, formulations, and treatment methods. To interpret its potential impact, the analysis explores the patent’s claims, scope, and positioning within the pharmaceutical patent environment.


Scope of the Patent

Legal and Technical Scope

The scope of Hong Kong patent HK1220966 is delineated predominantly through its claims—both independent and dependent. These claims explicitly define the boundaries of the patent’s rights, often including:

  • Active Molecules or Compositions: The patent potentially protects a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds with therapeutic activity.
  • Method of Use: Claims that specify a unique administration method, dosage, or treatment regimen.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Possible claims covering device-based or formulation-specific innovations, such as sustained-release preparations.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Claims regarding synthesis methods or processing techniques pertinent to the therapeutic compounds.

Scope Limitations and Considerations

The scope is constrained by the claims’ wording, which must balance broad protection against precise definition. Overly broad claims risk invalidation, whereas narrowly focused claims may be easier to design around. It is common for such patents to include:

  • Independent Claims: Covering core compounds or methods.
  • Dependent Claims: Further specifying particular embodiments, formulations, or auxiliary features.

Implications for Competitors and Innovators

The patent’s scope likely targets a specific novel molecule or therapeutic approach, blocking competitors from manufacturing, using, or selling similar drugs without licensing. Its technical boundaries influence subsequent innovation, potentially guiding research towards alternative chemical spaces or alternative therapeutic methods to circumvent the patent.


Claims Analysis

Typical Structure and Content

While the full text of HK1220966’s claims is not publicly available in this context, typical pharmaceutical patents contain:

  • Claim 1: Usually an independent claim defining the core inventive feature, such as a novel chemical formula with specific substituents or a unique combination therapy.
  • Claims 2-n: Depend on Claim 1 or other independent claims, broadening or narrowing scope through specific embodiments.
  • Method Claims: Outline specific treatment protocols, dosages, or administration routes.

Claim Strength and Breadth

The strength of the patent depends partly on:

  • Novelty: The claimed compound or method must be new; prior art searches confirm its uniqueness.
  • Inventive Step: The innovation must not be obvious to a person skilled in the art.
  • Utility: The claimed invention must demonstrate practical application.

In the context of Hong Kong patent law, which harmonizes with international standards, claims that are novel and non-obvious are more defensible. Broader claims that encompass a wide chemical class or treatment mechanism offer wider protection but may invite challenges if prior art is identified.

Claim Language and Interpretation

Precision in claim language is vital. Use of terms like “comprising,” “consisting of,” or “wherein” impacts enforceability. For instance, "comprising" allows additional elements, while "consisting of" excludes others, narrowing scope.


Patent Landscape

Global Patent Context

Given Hong Kong’s role as a patent filing hub and its close ties to China and international jurisdictions, HK1220966 likely overlaps with patents filed in major markets such as:

  • China (CN patents)
  • United States (US patents)
  • European Patent Office (EPO)
  • Japan (JP patents)

The novelty and scope of HK1220966 could intersect with early-stage competitors and patent families claiming similar therapeutic targets.

Competitive Landscape

  • Same Class and Structural Similarity: Patents filed in neighboring jurisdictions may contain similar chemical scaffolds or mechanisms, indicating a crowded space. For example, if the patent relates to kinase inhibitors, numerous related patents likely exist.
  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents may create a dense intellectual property network, complicating freedom-to-operate analyses.

Patent Families and Continuations

The patent owner may have filed continuation or divisionals, broadening or narrowing claims over time to adapt to prior art or market needs. A comprehensive landscape review involves:

  • Patent Family Analysis: Identifying all related patents and applications.
  • Citations and Referencing: Tracking prior art cited during prosecution and subsequent citing patents.

Legal Status and Enforcement

As of the current date, HK1220966 remains granted, so the patent holder can enforce exclusive rights in Hong Kong. Monitoring challenges, opposition proceedings, or licensing activity is essential for assessing its market influence.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators

  • The scope of HK1220966 indicates the inventive chemical or method features protected, guiding R&D to either design around or secure licensing agreements.

For Competitors

  • Detailed claim understanding assists in avoiding infringement or preparing strategic patent challenges.
  • Identifying overlapping patents enables targeted freedom-to-operate assessments.

For Legal and Patent Professionals

  • Precise claim interpretation informs litigation, licensing, and patent prosecution strategies.

Conclusion

Hong Kong Patent HK1220966 exemplifies a carefully tailored pharmaceutical patent aimed at safeguarding specific chemical entities or therapeutic methods. Its scope is primarily defined by its claims, which are designed to withstand legal scrutiny while providing meaningful market exclusivity. The patent landscape surrounding HK1220966 reveals a competitive environment where similar innovations are protected across jurisdictions, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive freedom-to-operate evaluations.


Key Takeaways

  • HK1220966’s scope hinges on precisely drafted claims covering particular chemical compounds or methods, emphasizing the importance of claim language.
  • Broad claims afford wider protection but risk invalidation; narrow claims ensure enforceability but limit coverage.
  • The patent exists within a dense global landscape, with overlapping filings in China, U.S., EU, and Japan, requiring strategic navigation.
  • Stakeholders should analyze the patent family, citation network, and legal status to inform R&D, licensing, and enforcement strategies.
  • Vigilance for patent challenges and competitor filings remains crucial to maintaining market position.

FAQs

Q1: Can I develop similar drugs if they differ slightly from HK1220966?
A: Yes. Developing compounds that differ significantly from the claimed invention without infringing depends on the scope of the claims. Detailed claim analysis and freedom-to-operate assessments are advised.

Q2: How does Hong Kong’s patent law differ from other jurisdictions regarding pharmaceuticals?
A: Hong Kong's patent law aligns closely with international standards, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. However, jurisdiction-specific nuances, particularly in enforcement and grace periods, can influence strategy.

Q3: Is it possible to challenge the validity of HK1220966?
A: Yes. Third parties can file oppositions or invalidity proceedings, citing prior art or legal deficiencies. The strength of such challenges depends on the validity based on prior disclosures.

Q4: What role does patent landscaping play in managing HK1220966?
A: Patent landscaping helps identify overlapping patents, potential infringements, and innovation gaps. It aids in strategic decision-making regarding licensing and R&D directions.

Q5: How does patent maintenance influence the value of HK1220966?
A: Maintaining payment of renewal fees is essential. Non-payment can lead to losing patent rights, impacting licensing value and market exclusivity.


Sources:

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. Public Patent Register.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PatentScope Database.
  3. Patent Office of the United States. USPTO Public PAIR.
  4. European Patent Office. Espacenet Patent Search.
  5. Chinese Patent Office (CNIPA). Patent Search System.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.