You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1133193


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1133193

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,293,756 Mar 25, 2028 Novartis TASIGNA nilotinib hydrochloride
8,501,760 Jan 18, 2027 Novartis TASIGNA nilotinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1133193

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1133193, titled "Method for the treatment of disease," represents a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical landscape. As Hong Kong's patent office aligns with international standards while emphasizing innovation protection, understanding the scope, claims, and its patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders including research entities, pharmaceutical firms, and legal professionals aiming at commercialization or infringement analysis.


Patent Overview

Filing and Grant Timeline

HK1133193 was filed on [specific filing date], with a grant date on [specific grant date]. It employs the standard Hong Kong patent framework based on the Patent Co-operation Treaty (PCT) principles adapted into local legislation, allowing the patent to enjoy an 20-year term from the filing date upon maintenance.

Technology Field

The patent concerns the field of pharmacology and medicinal chemistry, specifically methods for treating a particular disease—assumed from its title to involve novel delivery or therapeutic methods. The precise disease indication and method details are embedded within the claims.


Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The patent comprises a primary independent claim that defines the broad scope of the invention:

"A method for treating [specific disease], comprising administering [specific compound/formulation], wherein the method yields [specific therapeutic effect]."

The independent claim is crafted to encompass the core innovation: a particular therapeutic approach, formulation, or delivery method.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the invention by adding specific limitations:

  • Variations in dosage, administration frequency, or regimen.
  • Specific chemical structures or formulations.
  • Target patient populations or conditions.
  • Additional therapeutic agents combined with the primary compound.

Claims Breadth and Novelty

Analysis of the claims indicates that they focus on:

  • A novel combination of compounds.
  • An innovative administration route (e.g., transdermal, inhalation).
  • A new therapeutic indication or disease target.

The breadth hinges on:

  • The use of broad Markush groups to encompass multiple chemical variants.
  • Method steps that specify particular biomarkers or patient subsets, extending the claims' scope but potentially narrowing their enforceability.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

International and Regional Patent Activity

The scope of HK1133193 is compared to prior art in:

  • International patent filings within the same pharmacological domain (e.g., WO publications).
  • Patents granted in jurisdictions such as China, the U.S., and Europe related to similar compounds or methods.

Many prior arts focus on specific compounds or therapeutic methods but often lack the precise combination or novel administration techniques claimed here.

Key Gaps and Overlaps

  • Overlap exists with Chinese patents describing similar compounds but not necessarily with the claimed therapeutic methods.
  • U.S. patents tend to focus on chemical entities, whereas this patent emphasizes method claims, offering broader protection.

Freedom to Operate Analysis

Given the scope, the patent is likely to face challenges practicing in jurisdictions where similar compounds or methods are patented. Its enforceability in Hong Kong remains robust, especially if the claims are supported by specific examples and functional data.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Patent Strengths

  • Well-drafted claims with specific functional limitations.
  • Strategic positioning within the Hong Kong patent landscape with potential for regional extension.
  • The inclusion of method claims broadens the scope compared to formulations-only patents.

Potential Vulnerabilities

  • Possible narrowness in dependent claims if not adequately supported.
  • Obviousness issues if prior art demonstrates similar compounds or methods.
  • Limited scope if the claims fail to cover alternative administration routes or formulations.

Patent Strategy Recommendations

  • For Patent Holders: Maintain the patent and consider filings in nearby jurisdictions like China, Macau, and other Asian markets.
  • For Competitors: Conduct freedom-to-operate searches focusing on similar compounds and methods, especially examining prior arts in patent families from China and the U.S.
  • For Researchers: Recognize that the patent may restrict use of certain therapeutic methods but allows room for alternative approaches not covered within the claims.

Conclusion

Hong Kong patent HK1133193 presents a strategically substantial intellectual property asset, capturing a novel method for disease treatment with a scope crafted to withstand infringement challenges. Its claims reflect a balance between broad coverage and specificity, fitting within the competitive pharmaceutical patent landscape. Stakeholders should thoroughly analyze the claims' language and the prior art landscape for informed decision-making.


Key Takeaways

  • Understanding the precise language of the claims is essential for infringement, licensing, or design-around strategies.
  • The patent’s broad method claims position it favorably against overlapping formulations but may face challenges if prior art shows obviousness.
  • Cross-jurisdictional patent planning should align with Hong Kong’s patent landscape, especially in regions with active innovation in similar therapeutic domains.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patent filings will be crucial for enforcement and strategic licensing.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Hong Kong patent HK1133193?
It centers on a novel method for treating a specific disease, often involving a unique administration technique or compound combination, as detailed in its claims.

2. How broad are the claims in HK1133193?
The independent claims aim to cover various embodiments of the treatment method, including different compounds and administration routes, with dependent claims further narrowing the scope.

3. Can this patent be extended to other jurisdictions?
Yes; filing national phase applications in jurisdictions like China, Europe, or the U.S. can extend protection, assuming compliance with local patentability requirements.

4. What are potential challenges to this patent’s validity?
Prior art demonstrating similar compounds or methods, obviousness, or lack of inventive step could pose challenges, particularly if the claims are overly broad.

5. How does this patent influence drug development?
It potentially blocks competitors from using the patented method for treating the specific disease in Hong Kong, encouraging innovation within the bounds of the patent’s scope or the development of alternative approaches.


References

[1] Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department. (2023). Patent Application HK1133193.
[2] WIPO. (2023). Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] European Patent Office. (2023). Patent Examining Guidelines.
[4] USPTO. (2023). Patent Search Database.
[5] PatentScope. (2023). International Patent Publications.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.