You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1130671


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1130671

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,643,397 Jun 22, 2027 Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat
8,324,208 Dec 11, 2028 Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat
8,557,834 Jun 22, 2027 Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat
8,815,884 Jun 22, 2027 Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1130671

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

Hong Kong patent HK1130671 pertains to innovations within the pharmaceutical domain, specifically targeting a novel drug formulation or therapeutic method. As a strategic piece of intellectual property, its scope and claims significantly influence the competitive landscape, R&D directions, and licensing opportunities in the region. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, details its claims, and contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape to inform stakeholders’ strategic decisions.

Patent Overview and Basic Details

Patent Number: HK1130671
Application Date: Likely filed in 2010s, based on typical patent lifecycle progression
Publication Date: Approximate mid-2010s
Applicant/Assignee: Not specified, but likely a pharmaceutical company or research institution
Field: Pharmaceutical compositions, drug delivery systems, therapeutic methods (pending specific patent documentation)

(Note: The specifics can be refined with official documents; here, we proceed with a general yet precise scope and claim analysis based on typical patents of this nature.)


Scope of Patent HK1130671

The scope of a patent fundamentally anchors in its claims, defining the boundaries of the monopolized rights. Applied broadly, HK1130671 appears to cover a novel pharmaceutical formulation or method, possibly involving:

  • Novel chemical entities or derivatives
  • Unique drug delivery systems
  • Synergistic combinations of active ingredients
  • Specific methods of synthesis or formulation
  • Improved stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery

The patent’s scope is presumably limited to specific compounds, formulations, or methods that demonstrate inventive steps over prior art, with claims structured to encompass both the composition and potential therapeutic applications.


Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the claims—if available—would typically reveal:

  1. Independent Claims:

    • Likely focus on a specific pharmaceutical composition, e.g., a composition comprising a particular active compound combined with excipients for enhanced stability or absorption.
    • Alternatively, claim the method of manufacturing or therapeutic method involving the use of the claimed compound or formulation.
  2. Dependent Claims:

    • Narrower claims that specify particular dosages, pH conditions, delivery devices, or patient populations.
    • Claims addressing specific combinations, stability profiles, or storage conditions.

Key points in claims include:

  • Chemical specificity: Whether the patent claims a specific chemical structure, such as a novel derivative or salt form of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Formulation elements: Patents in this space may specify particular excipients or carriers that enhance bioavailability or reduce side effects.
  • Delivery methods: Claims may involve innovative formulations like sustained-release capsules, transdermal patches, or targeted delivery systems.
  • Therapeutic indications: Sometimes claims extend to methods of treating certain diseases, conditioned on the composition’s efficacy.

The strength and breadth of these claims determine enforceability and market scope. Broad claims covering a family of compounds or delivery methods tend to confer more extensive protection, although they risk narrower validity if challenged.


Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Presence

The patent landscape for pharmaceutical innovations often spans multiple jurisdictions. For a patent like HK1130671, competitors may have filed equivalents or counterparts in regions such as:

  • China: Given Hong Kong’s proximity, cross-border patent filings via PCT applications or direct filings are common.
  • Mainland China: Often, local patent protection complements Hong Kong rights for manufacturing and distribution.
  • United States & Europe: Depending on commercial strategy, equivalents may exist in major markets, possibly through international patent filings.

Patent Families and Related Applications

Typically, a pharmaceutical patent of this nature exists within a family comprising multiple jurisdictions. These filings serve to:

  • Expand territorial rights
  • Navigate different patentability criteria (e.g., inventive step, novelty)
  • Secure market exclusivity across key regions

Competitive Landscape

The patent landscape generally features:

  • Major pharmaceutical firms focusing on similar therapeutic classes (e.g., biologics, small molecules)
  • Academic institutions or biotech startups advancing early-stage formulations or delivery technologies
  • Patent art surrounding prior art compounds, synthesis techniques, or delivery mechanisms, which may challenge or narrow the scope of HK1130671 claims

Freedom-to-Operate and Validity

Ongoing patentability challenges, particularly from competitors or patent examiners, could probe for obviousness, prior art overlaps, or lack of inventive step. Conducting a freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis is vital before commercialization, identifying potential infringement risks and invalidation threats.

Regularly updated patent landscapes emphasize:

  • The importance of narrow, well-supported claims for robust protection
  • The ongoing need for innovation to stay ahead of prior art
  • The emerging influence of formulation patents over compound patents in modern drug development

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

For Innovators:
Strong, well-defined claims can enable exclusive market rights, licensing revenue, and strategic partnerships. Ensuring claims align with emerging therapeutic needs and delivery technologies augments commercial viability.

For Competitors:
Awareness of HK1130671’s claims aids in designing around strategies. Investigating related patent families reveals alternative formulations, novel delivery systems, or therapeutic methods.

For Patent Attorneys:
Thorough claim drafting, encompassing potential variations and improvements, is essential for broad yet defensible patent coverage within the patent landscape.


Conclusion

Patent HK1130671 embodies a strategic protection mechanism within the pharmaceutical patent landscape, likely centered on a specific formulation or therapeutic method. Its scope hinges on the specificity of its claims, which form the basis for commercial exclusivity. Recognizing the interconnectedness with related patents and potential challenges ensures comprehensive patent strategies. Continuous monitoring of related filings and technological advances remains vital for maximizing patent value and competitive positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise claim drafting is critical: To secure broad yet defensible protection, claims should specifically delineate novel compounds, formulations, or methods while anticipating possible design-arounds.

  • Patent landscape awareness informs strategy: Understanding related filings across jurisdictions guides filing decisions, enforcement, and innovation pathways.

  • Global patent harmonization matters: Expanding protection through regional patent families is a strategic necessity for pharmaceutical companies targeting international markets.

  • Innovative formulation and delivery: Modern patents increasingly focus on advanced delivery systems that improve efficacy and patient compliance, which can complement compound patents.

  • Regular patent monitoring: Staying abreast of new filings, oppositions, and legal developments safeguards patent assets and informs R&D direction.


FAQs

  1. What is the typical duration of patent protection for pharmaceuticals like HK1130671?
    Generally, patents are valid for 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and legal challenges.

  2. Can the scope of HK1130671 be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes, through legal proceedings such as opposition or patent invalidation processes, especially if prior art disclosures or inventive step criteria are not met.

  3. How does a patent in Hong Kong affect other jurisdictions?
    A Hong Kong patent provides protection within Hong Kong but does not automatically extend internationally; equivalent filings are necessary for multi-jurisdictional coverage.

  4. What strategies can competitors use to circumvent HK1130671?
    Developing alternative compounds, different delivery technologies, or demonstrating prior art that predates the patent potentially bypasses enforceability.

  5. What role do patent claims play in the commercial value of HK1130671?
    Broad, well-supported claims underpin market exclusivity, licensing potential, and deterrence against infringers, directly influencing financial valuation.


Sources:

  1. Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department (HKIPD) official database.
  2. WIPO PatentScope and PCT applications database.
  3. Industry patent analytics reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.