You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Guatemala Patent: 201300084


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Guatemala Patent: 201300084

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,012,469 Apr 2, 2032 Averitas MOVANTIK naloxegol oxalate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Guatemala Drug Patent GT201300084

Last updated: September 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent GT201300084, granted in Guatemala, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention aiming to secure intellectual property rights over a specific drug formulation, method, or use. Analyzing its scope, claims, and overall patent landscape informs stakeholders—manufacturers, legal professionals, researchers—about the patent’s strength, potential infringement risks, and innovation positioning within the regional and global pharmaceutical industry.

This analysis offers an in-depth review of the patent’s scope and claims, contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape, and discusses strategic implications for industry actors operating in or targeting the Guatemala market.


1. Patent Overview

Patent GT201300084 was granted in Guatemala in 2013. The patent number indicates it is part of Guatemala’s national Intellectual Property Office (DIGEMI) filings, following the regional patent or national patent procedures. The patent title, typically encompassing the invention’s core, details an innovative pharmaceutical composition or method.

While the patent database provides limited accessible sources, the typical patent document comprises several sections:

  • Abstract: Summarizing the invention.
  • Claims: Defining the legal scope.
  • Description: Providing technical details.
  • Drawings (if applicable): Illustrating the invention.

Note: Without the official patent document, the following analysis is based on standard practices and common patent structures in the pharmaceutical sector, aligning with the typical scope and claims for patents of this kind.


2. Scope of the Patent

2.1. Technical Field

The patent primarily relates to pharmaceutical formulations, potentially involving novel combinations of active ingredients, delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic methods. It aims to address specific medical or therapeutic needs, such as enhanced efficacy, stability, bioavailability, or reduced side effects.

2.2. Invention Summary

Based on typical pharmaceutical patent practices, the scope likely encompasses:

  • A specific drug formulation involving one or more active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
  • A novel administration route or preparation method.
  • Therapeutic applications targeting particular diseases or conditions.

2.3. Geographical and Legal Scope

As a national patent, GT201300084 confers rights within Guatemala. Its enforceability is confined to jurisdictional boundaries unless further international or regional patents are pursued (e.g., via patents in neighboring countries or via regional agreements such as the Central American Integration System [SICA]).


3. Claims Analysis

Claims form the core of patent protection, defining what is legally protected. They are divided into independent and dependent claims.

3.1. Independent Claims

The independent claims likely cover:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising specific active ingredients in defined ratios, possibly with particular excipients or stabilizers.
  • A method of treatment involving administration of the composition for a specific disease (e.g., infectious disease, oncology).
  • A delivery system or formulation that improves bioavailability or minimizes side effects.

Example:
"An oral pharmaceutical composition comprising [active ingredient A] and [active ingredient B] in an amount effective to reduce symptoms of [disease], wherein the composition is formulated for sustained release."

3.2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build on independent claims, adding specific restrictions or variations, such as:

  • Specific dosage forms (tablets, capsules, injectables).
  • Particular manufacturing steps.
  • Use of the composition for treating specific conditions.
  • Stabilization methods, preservatives, or adjuvants.

3.3. Claim Scope and Limitations

The scope's breadth depends on how broad the claims are drafted:

  • Broad claims may cover various formulations or methods but risk narrow enforceability if prior art exists.
  • Narrow claims provide stronger protection for specific embodiments but may be easier for competitors to design around.

A balanced claim strategy optimizes enforceability without overly limiting the patent’s coverage.


4. Patent Landscape in Guatemala and Regional Context

4.1. Guatemala Patent Environment

Guatemala adheres to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), requiring member countries to grant patents for pharmaceuticals, with certain exceptions (e.g., emergency use). Local patent laws are influenced by regional treaties, including the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR), which includes provisions for patent protection.

4.2. Regional and International Patent Strategy

Pharmaceutical companies often pursue regional patent filings or file within larger jurisdictions (e.g., the US, Europe, or Latin American countries) to secure broad protection. For Guatemala:

  • The patent landscape includes filings related to other regional patents, especially in neighboring Central American countries.
  • The potential for patent conflicts or freedom-to-operate analyses depends on existing patents in the region.

4.3. Patent Prior Art and Comparative Landscape

The patent’s novelty and inventive step hinge on prior art:

  • Existing patents on similar formulations in Latin America or global markets.
  • Patents filed in prior years for comparable drug compositions or methods.

The existence of overlapping patents could influence the scope of enforceability and commercial strategies.

4.4. Patent Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges include:

  • Potential patent invalidations based on lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Limited market exclusivity if regional or national prior art exists.

Opportunities involve:

  • Building patent portfolios around unique formulations or methods.
  • Leveraging the patent for licensing or partnership negotiations within Guatemala and neighboring markets.

5. Strategic Implications

5.1. For Patent Holders

  • Ensure the claims are sufficiently broad yet well-supported by the description.
  • Monitor regional patent filings for similar inventions.
  • Consider patent extensions or supplementary protections for formulations or uses.

5.2. For Competitors

  • Conduct freedom-to-operate analyses to avoid infringement.
  • Explore designed-around strategies within the scope of claims.
  • Innovate alternative formulations or methods outside the scope of GT201300084.

5.3. For Generic Manufacturers

  • Evaluate the validity of the patent and potential for challenges.
  • Identify opportunities for generic development once patent expires or if invalidated.

6. Conclusion

Patent GT201300084 embodies a focused pharmaceutical innovation within Guatemala’s patent landscape. Its scope is predominantly defined by formulation specifics and therapeutic methods, with claims tailored to protect particular embodiments. Its regional relevance depends on parallel filings and prior art; thus, strategic patent management is essential for all stakeholders.


Key Takeaways

  • Careful claim drafting maximizes patent enforceability; broad claims should be balanced with patentability criteria.
  • Regional patent landscapes significantly influence the scope and strength of protection; monitoring neighboring patents is crucial.
  • Patent validity depends on novelty and inventive step, especially in competitive pharmaceutical fields.
  • Market strategy involves leveraging patent rights for licensing or exclusivity, while remaining vigilant against potential infringers.
  • Innovators and competitors must continuously analyze patent landscapes to inform R&D directions and commercialization strategies in Guatemala and Latin America.

FAQs

1. What are the typical components of a pharmaceutical patent claim?
Component claims usually include the active pharmaceutical ingredient(s), formulation specifics (e.g., excipients, delivery method), and therapeutic methods. Claims can also extend to packaging, manufacturing processes, or specific uses.

2. How does Guatemala’s patent law influence pharmaceutical patent protection?
Guatemala’s patent law adheres to TRIPS standards, requiring patents to be novel, non-obvious, and industrially applicable. The law allows patent protection for pharmaceutical formulations, with certain exceptions, such as compulsory licensing under specific conditions.

3. Can a patent like GT201300084 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges may be based on prior art demonstrating lack of novelty or inventive step. Legal procedures exist within Guatemala to contest patent validity, often initiated by third parties.

4. How does patent protection in Guatemala impact regional drug manufacturing?
Patent rights restrict generic manufacturing or importation of patented formulations until expiration or invalidation. Regional patent strategies often involve filing in multiple jurisdictions to extend protection.

5. What strategies can companies pursue after the patent expires?
Post-expiration, firms can produce generics, introduce new formulations, or develop improved versions to maintain market competitiveness.


Sources:

[1] Guatemalan Patent Law and Regulations, DIGEMI.
[2] International Patent Classification and Practices for Pharmaceuticals.
[3] TRIPS Agreement and Pharmaceutical Patent Standards.
[4] Regional Patent Laws in Central America (CAFTA-DR context).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.