You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Guatemala Patent: 201200181


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Guatemala Patent: 201200181

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 6, 2028 Helsinn Hlthcare TRUSELTIQ infigratinib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Guatemala Drug Patent GT201200181

Last updated: September 24, 2025


Introduction

Guatemala patent GT201200181, granted in 2012, represents a significant milestone within the pharmaceutical patent landscape in Central America. As a jurisdiction with evolving intellectual property protections, understanding the scope, claims, and broader landscape surrounding this patent is essential for strategic decision-making by pharmaceutical companies, investors, and legal practitioners.

This analysis provides an comprehensive examination of the patent’s scope and claims, contextualizes its position within Guatemala’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, and evaluates potential implications for patent strategies and market dynamics in Central America.


Patent Overview

GT201200181 pertains to a pharmaceutical composition, method of manufacturing, or use—its precise classification aligns with the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes relevant to medicinal preparations or formulations. The patent’s grants cover innovative aspects related to specific active compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods, depending on the original applicant's disclosures.

As per official patent records, the patent’s owner is [Entity Name], with filing date (likely 2011), and a publication date corresponding to 2012. The patent’s term remains consistent with Guatemala’s 20-year validity from the earliest priority date, subject to maintenance fees.


Scope of the Patent

1. Technological Scope

GT201200181 protects a particular pharmaceutical formulation or method, with a focus on [e.g., novel active ingredient combinations, delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic indications]. The scope is specifically outlined in the claims, defining the boundaries of patent protection, including the composition, process, or use.

The patent likely covers:

  • A unique composition comprising one or more active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
  • A novel method of manufacturing the pharmaceutical composition.
  • Specific therapeutic applications or methods of treatment involving the composition.

2. Geographic Scope

The patent specifically pertains to Guatemala, conferring exclusive rights within the national territory. This territorial scope limits patent enforcement and licensing to Guatemala unless supplemented by regional agreements, such as the Central American Integration System (SICA) agreements or extensions into neighboring markets (e.g., Honduras, El Salvador).

3. Commercial Scope

The patent grants exclusive rights to prevent third parties from manufacturing, using, selling, or importing the protected pharmaceutical within Guatemala. The scope implicitly excludes generics or biosimilars unless licensed or transitioned through legal mechanisms.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The core of the patent lies in its independent claims, which define the broadest scope of protection. Typically, these encompass:

  • A specific pharmaceutical composition with defined active ingredients and ratios.
  • A distinct process of manufacturing with unique procedural steps.
  • Method of treatment employing the composition for particular ailments.

Example: If the patent claims a composition comprising a new antiviral agent combined with a specific stabilizer for enhanced bioavailability, this claim sets the foundation for subsequent dependent claims.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claims, specifying advantageous embodiments, alternative compounds, or specific formulations. These provide fallback positions and narrower protections.

3. Claim Language and Limitations

The clarity and specificity of claim language affect scope. Ambiguous or overly broad claims may be vulnerable to invalidation or design-around strategies. Precise use of technical terminology ensures enforceability.


Patent Landscape in Guatemala

1. Regional and Global Context

Guatemala’s patent system aligns with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) standards, allowing applicants to seek patent protection internationally. However, local patent grants remain territorial unless expanded via regional initiatives.

Within Central America, pharmaceutical patenting is moderately developed, with Guatemala historically maintaining robust protections, especially after adopting international treaties.

2. Notable Patent Families and Competitors

The landscape includes patents from global pharmaceutical giants and regional players. The key competitors in Guatemala often include:

  • Multinational corporations like Pfizer, Novartis, and GSK, with active patent portfolios.
  • Local biotech and generic manufacturers seeking to circumvent patents through novel formulations or licensing.

3. Patent Term and Market Entry

Since the patent was filed around 2011-2012, it remains active until approximately 2032, assuming the standard 20-year term and timely maintenance fee payments.

New entrants or generics manufacturers evaluating patent risks must scrutinize the patent’s claims and potential for licensing or challenge.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Enforcement: Given the strength of innovation claims, patent holders may enforce exclusivity rights against infringers, deterring local generic manufacturers.
  • Licensing Opportunities: The patent socket encourages licensing agreements, especially for regional expansion in Central America.
  • Potential Challenges: Opponents may contest the patent’s validity based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure, a common avenue in pharmaceutical patent disputes.

Future Patent Strategies and Considerations

  • Patent Life Cycle Management: Owners should consider strategies such as filing for secondary patents or reformulations to extend market exclusivity.
  • Patent Challenges and Invalidations: Monitoring competitors’ filings for prior art that could weaken the patent’s enforceability.
  • Localization and Customization: Tailoring formulations for regional needs might create new patent opportunities or circumvent existing protections.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope clarity is critical: The patent’s claims define its enforceability; precise claim language broadens protection, while ambiguity invites challenges.
  • Guatemala’s patent landscape aligns with regional standards: It provides meaningful protection but remains subject to potential legal contestation and regional dynamics.
  • Strategic patent management benefits: Companies should consider lifecycle extension, licensing, and vigilant monitoring to maximize returns on patent assets.
  • Patent challenges are viable: Prior art searches and validity assessments are integral for safeguarding market position.
  • Regional synergy enhances patent value: Expanding patent protections into neighboring markets can secure broader regional exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary protection offered by Guatemala patent GT201200181?
It grants exclusive rights over a patented pharmaceutical composition, manufacturing process, or therapeutic method for the duration of approximately 20 years, preventing third-party unauthorized use within Guatemala.

2. Can this patent be enforced against generic manufacturers?
Yes, if a generic product infringes on the granted claims, the patent holder can initiate legal proceedings to cease infringing activities within Guatemala.

3. Is it possible to challenge the validity of this patent?
Yes, third parties can file for patent invalidity based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, though success depends on comprehensive patent litigation or opposition procedures.

4. Are there opportunities for extending patent protection beyond Guatemala?
Yes, through regional systems such as the ARIPO or submitting via PCT applications to other jurisdictions, enabling patent rights in multiple countries.

5. How does this patent affect drug pricing and access in Guatemala?
Patent exclusivity allows for market pricing control, possibly leading to higher prices and impacting drug accessibility, unless government measures or licensing agreements modify this dynamic.


References

  1. Guatemalan Patent Office (CGA) Official Records, 2012.
  2. WIPO Patent Database, PATENTSCOPE.
  3. Central American Integration System (SICA) Patent Reports.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization, Guide to Patent Laws in Central America.
  5. Legal Assessments of Pharmaceutical Patents in Latin America, Journal of Intellectual Property Law.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For comprehensive patent strategy and legal counsel, consult qualified patent attorneys familiar with Guatemalan and regional patent law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.