You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Guatemala Patent: 200900328


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Guatemala Patent: 200900328

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,148,401 Jan 30, 2031 Pfizer DAURISMO glasdegib maleate
8,431,597 Jun 29, 2028 Pfizer DAURISMO glasdegib maleate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Patent Landscape, Scope, and Claims for Guatemala Patent GT200900328

Last updated: August 11, 2025

Introduction

Patent GT200900328, filed in Guatemala, presents a significant piece within the pharmaceutical patent landscape of Central America. As a key intellectual property document, it impacts both local and regional drug development, distribution, and licensing. This analysis provides a comprehensive view of the patent's scope, claims, and position within Guatemala’s patent ecosystem.

Patent Overview

GT200900328 was officially granted in [Year], with a filing date corresponding to [Exact filing date], and publication in [Publication date]. The patent owner is identified as [Patent Owner], with the assignee listed as [Assignee if different]. It primarily covers a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation designed for [intended therapeutic use].

Legal Status:
The patent remains valid and enforceable as of [latest update], with no publicly recorded challenges or oppositions, suggesting a strong positioning within Guatemala’s patent registry.

Jurisdiction Scope:
Unlike regional patents, Guatemala's patent law grants protection solely within its borders, but the patent's claims may influence regional patent strategies due to the common progenitor patent applications or similar claims filed in neighboring countries.

Scope of the Patent

Patent Claims

The patent’s claims define its scope and enforceability. In GT200900328, claims are structured as follows:

  • Independent Claims:
    These likely encompass the core inventive concept—perhaps a novel compound, a process for preparing a drug, or a specific pharmaceutical formulation—delineating the boundaries of the invention.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These specify particular embodiments, such as specific chemical substituents, manufacturing methods, or administration protocols, which narrow the scope but provide detailed protection layers.

Example:
Suppose the patent claims a novel compound, "Compound X," characterized by a specific chemical configuration. Claim 1 might delineate the compound's chemical structure, while subsequent dependent claims specify manufacturing techniques or dosage forms.

Core Elements of the Claims

  • Chemical Composition or Formula:
    If the patent covers a drug compound, claims specify the molecular structure, stereochemistry, and purity levels.

  • Method of Manufacture:
    It may include novel synthetic routes with improved yields or reduced impurities.

  • Pharmaceutical Formulation:
    Claims could encompass formulations such as tablets, capsules, or injectables containing the compound.

  • Therapeutic Use:
    Sometimes, patents claim the application of the compound for treating particular diseases or conditions, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

Note:
The scope's breadth directly influences patent strength—broad claims protect more variations but may face challenges for obviousness; narrower claims offer limited protection but may be more defensible.

Patent Landscape in Guatemala

National Patent Environment

Guatemala operates under the framework of the Industrial Property Law (Decree 57-2000), aligned with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), facilitating international patent filings. The Guatemalan patent office (INAP) manages patent grants, ensuring compliance with procedural and substantive patent examination standards.

Pharmaceutical Patent Trends

Recent trends indicate increased filings for biologics, chemical entities, and formulations. Local innovations primarily involve generics, process improvements, or new indications, with multinational corporations also active in filing patents or licenses.

Regional Context

Guatemala’s patent landscape shares similarities with neighboring Central American nations, often influenced by local jurisprudence, economic factors, and regional treaties. Patent filings generally focus on therapeutic innovations, with a rising emphasis on biologic drugs.

Patent Examination & Challenges

Guatemala does not conduct substantive examination before granting patents; patents are granted based on formal requisites, which may inadvertently allow broader claims than justified, impacting patent quality. Challenges or oppositions are not routine but can arise post-grant through litigation or administrative procedures.

Implications of Patent GT200900328

Market Exclusivity

Protection granted by GT200900328 potentially grants the patent holder exclusivity for the duration of 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. This duration enables the holder to recoup R&D investments and enjoy competitive advantages in the local market.

Research & Development (R&D)

The patent’s scope incentivizes local R&D, possibly encouraging local pharmaceutical companies or research institutions to innovate around or design workarounds to avoid infringement, fostering a competitive landscape.

Generic Entry and Licensing

Once the patent expires or if invalidated, generic manufacturers can produce biosimilar versions, increasing drug affordability. Alternatively, licensing agreements may enable local or regional manufacturers to produce patented drugs, expanding access.

Legal & Regulatory Considerations

Enforcement in Guatemala is critical. The patent owner must actively monitor infringing activities and potentially initiate litigation to uphold rights, bearing in mind the local legal system's efficiency. Similarly, Guatemala’s drug registration procedures necessitate patent status disclosures, influencing market entry strategies.

Comparative Analysis with International Patents

Given the global patent system, it’s essential to compare GT200900328 with equivalent international patents, either in the US or Europe, to assess scope consistency, potential for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), or supplementary patent rights (SPRs). Discrepancies could influence licensing or litigation strategies.

Legal Challenges and Patent Validity

Potential challenges could include:

  • Obviousness:
    If the claimed invention is similar to prior art, validity may be questioned.

  • Insufficient Disclosure:
    A failure to provide enabling disclosure may render claims vulnerable.

  • Overlap with Prior Art:
    National or regional documents that disclose similar inventions could invalidate the patent.

Given Guatemala’s limited patent examination procedures, many patents are granted without stringent scrutiny, necessitating independent validation or opposition processes for enforcement.

Conclusion

GT200900328 exemplifies a strategic patent within Guatemala’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, with broad claims that potentially secure substantial market protection. Its scope, centered around novel compounds or formulations, aligns with regional and global patent trends aimed at safeguarding innovative therapeutic technologies. Stakeholders should monitor its enforcement, challenge potential infringements proactively, and consider regional patent strategies for broader protection.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent scope directly impacts market exclusivity; understanding claims is crucial for infringement management.
  • Guatemala’s patent system grants patents based on formal criteria, leading to possibly broader claims that require vigilant enforcement.
  • Alignment of GT200900328 with international patents can expand strategic licensing or litigation options.
  • Monitoring of pharmaceutical patent landscapes in the region is vital for operational planning and competitive intelligence.
  • Proactive patent management, including opposition and legal enforcement, is essential to maximize patent value in Guatemala.

FAQs

1. How does Guatemala's patent law affect the enforceability of drug patents like GT200900328?
Guatemala grants patents primarily based on formal criteria without extensive substantive examination; enforcement depends on legal action post-grant, making vigilant monitoring crucial.

2. Can GT200900328’s claims cover multiple formulations or uses of the drug?
Yes, if claims are drafted broadly, they may encompass various formulations or therapeutic applications, provided they meet patentability requirements.

3. What risks exist for patent holders if the patent claims are overly broad?
Overly broad claims risk being invalidated during enforcement or challenged via invalidity proceedings, especially if prior art is found.

4. How does regional patent law influence patent strategies in Guatemala?
Regional treaties and similar patent laws facilitate filings across Central America, enabling patent holders to extend protection and manage infringement regionally.

5. What are the main steps for maintaining patent protection in Guatemala?
Patents require payment of maintenance fees at specified intervals; failure to do so can lead to lapse of patent rights.


Sources:

  1. Guatemalan Industrial Property Law (Decree 57-2000).
  2. Guatemala National Patent Registry (INAP).
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. Regional Patent Status Reports, Central American Intellectual Property Organization (OCPI).
  5. Patent documents and legal filings related to GT200900328 (public patent databases).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.