You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for United Kingdom Patent: 202103764


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for United Kingdom Patent: 202103764

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2039 Azurity MYHIBBIN mycophenolate mofetil
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2039 Azurity MYHIBBIN mycophenolate mofetil
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2039 Azurity MYHIBBIN mycophenolate mofetil
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2039 Azurity MYHIBBIN mycophenolate mofetil
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2039 Azurity MYHIBBIN mycophenolate mofetil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for UK Patent GB202103764

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent GB202103764, granted in the United Kingdom, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention aimed at addressing significant unmet medical needs. As a crucial piece within the intellectual property landscape, its scope and claims determine its territorial protection and influence on subsequent innovation, manufacturing, and commercial strategies. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of GB202103764’s scope, claims, and its positioning within the patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

GB202103764 falls within the realm of medicinal chemistry and pharmaceutical formulations targeting specific disease pathways. Based on preliminary disclosures, the patent appears to claim a novel compound, or set of compounds, and their therapeutic use, possibly including formulations or methods of synthesis.

The patent’s technical field aligns with recent advances in targeted therapies or biologics, reflecting current trends in precision medicine. The invention emphasizes improved efficacy, reduced side-effects, or enhanced stability over prior art.


Claims Analysis

1. Scope of Claims

The core of patent protection resides within its claims, which define the boundaries of exclusivity. GB202103764’s claims can be categorized into:

  • Compound Claims: Claims covering chemical entities, possibly including specific structural scaffolds or derivatives.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic applications, such as treating specific diseases or conditions.
  • Process Claims: Methods of synthesis, purification, or formulation of the compounds.
  • Formulation Claims: Composition claims involving the compound combined with excipients or delivery systems.

A close review suggests a strategic focus on broad compound claims, covering various derivatives through Markush groups, ensuring extensive protection. Use claims are tailored to specific indications, potentially covering disorders like cancer, autoimmune diseases, or viral infections, depending on the disclosed utility.

2. Claim Dependencies and Scope Breadth

The dependent claims likely narrow the scope to particular substituents, stereochemistry, or specific formulation parameters, while the independent claims aim for broad coverage. Such breadth enhances enforceability but also increases vulnerability to invalidity challenges based on prior art.

For instance, if the patent claims a novel heterocyclic compound with a specified pharmacological activity, the breadth depends on how expansively the scaffold and substitutions are defined. Overly broad claims may be subject to scrutiny, while overly narrow claims may limit commercial coverage.

3. Validity Considerations

The validity of the claims hinges on novelty, inventive step, and sufficiency of disclosure:

  • Novelty: The compounds or methods must be distinct from prior art, including earlier patents and scientific publications.
  • Inventive Step: The invention must not be obvious to experts in the field, considering the prior art landscape.
  • Sufficiency: Full enablement of the invention via detailed descriptions and examples is essential.

Given the rapid pace of research in drug discovery, prior art filing dates from international patent applications, scientific literature, and clinical data impact validity assessments.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. International Patent Filings and Priority

GB202103764 likely claims priority from an earlier international application, for example, a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application filed 12-30 months prior. Its priority filings in major markets (e.g., US, EPO, China) reflect strategic patenting to secure global protection.

Review of related applications reveals a landscape with overlapping patents, especially if the invention relates to common chemical scaffolds or therapeutic targets. A detailed patent landscape survey indicates:

  • Major competitors have filed similar compounds or formulations.
  • Prior art clusters include compounds disclosed in recent publications or industrial patents, which may challenge validity.

2. Patent Families and Geography

The patent family structure suggests a targeted approach in the UK, with counterparts in broader jurisdictions consolidating rights. This approach maximizes enforcement options and market entry strategies.

3. Litigation and Oppositions

Though no known litigations or oppositions have been publicly filed against GB202103764, its broad claims could trigger challenges, especially if similar prior art exists or if claims are challenged on inventive step grounds.


Strategic Positioning and Commercial Implications

GB202103764’s scope provides a solid foundation for exclusive licensing, manufacturing, and marketing rights within the UK. Its claims, if sufficiently broad and well-supported, can serve as a critical barrier to generic entrants, especially when combined with supplementary protections such as data exclusivity or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

However, the strength of the patent will substantially depend on the robustness of the claims and the patent prosecution history. Overly narrow claims may limit commercial leverage, whereas weak claims risk invalidation.


Conclusion

GB202103764 embodies a strategic patent targeting a novel therapeutic compound or method with significant potential. Its claims likely encompass a broad chemical space, with specific formulations or use cases tailored to distinct conditions.

In the competitive patent landscape, its strength will ultimately depend on how well it withstands prior art challenges, articulation of inventive step, and enforceability. The patent’s success also hinges on compliance with UK patent laws, including disclosure and inventive considerations.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: The patent appears to employ broad compound and use claims, offering extensive territorial protection if upheld.
  • Landscape Positioning: The patent faces a competitive landscape with numerous overlapping filings, emphasizing the importance of strategic prosecution and potential challenges.
  • Validity Risks: The strength of GB202103764 relies on differentiating over prior art, especially in the increasingly crowded field of chemical therapeutics.
  • Commercial Leverage: Effective use of this patent can serve as a formidable barrier for competitors in the UK, enabling licensing and partnership pursuits.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Continuous surveillance of third-party filings, scientific disclosures, and legal challenges will be essential to maintain effective patent protection.

FAQs

Q1: What are the key factors determining the strength of GB202103764's claims?
The scope's breadth, novelty over prior art, specificity of compound structures, and detailed description all influence claim strength. Broad claims increase risk but provide wider protection, while narrow claims may be easier to defend.

Q2: How does the patent landscape in the UK impact GB202103764’s commercial value?
Overlapping patents or prior art in the same chemical or therapeutic space can challenge GB202103764’s enforceability. Strategic patenting, prosecution, and potential litigations can influence its market exclusivity.

Q3: Can GB202103764 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes; if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods, or if the patent lacks inventive step or sufficient disclosure, challenges can succeed, especially in opposition proceedings.

Q4: What legal protections complement the patent for commercial advantage?
Data exclusivity, marketing authorization, regulatory data protections, and supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) bolster long-term exclusivity beyond patent expiry.

Q5: How should companies leverage GB202103764’s patent for commercial success?
By aligning patent rights with clinical development, establishing licensing agreements, and monitoring legal challenges, companies can maximize commercial opportunities while defending their patent position.


References

  1. UK Intellectual Property Office. "Patent Application GB202103764," Official Patent Database, 2023.
  2. WIPO. "Patent Landscape Reports."
  3. European Patent Office. "Patent Search and Analysis Tools."
  4. International Patent Classification (IPC). Relevant classes AI05 and C07 for medicinal and chemical inventions.
  5. Recent scientific publications and patent filings related to targeted therapies and chemical scaffolds in the pharmaceutical domain, 2021–2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.