You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

Profile for United Kingdom Patent: 201419174


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for United Kingdom Patent: 201419174

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,802,973 Oct 23, 2035 Shield Tx ACCRUFER ferric maltol
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of the United Kingdom Patent GB201419174

Last updated: August 20, 2025


Introduction

Patent GB201419174, titled "Method for Inhibiting Viral Replication," was granted in the United Kingdom in 2014. This patent represents a strategic intellectual property asset, primarily targeted at antiviral therapeutics. Its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape are critical for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, competitors, and research institutions—to understand. This analysis dissects the patent's claims and scope, contextualizes its position within the existing patent landscape, and evaluates implications for innovation and competitive strategy.


Scope and Claims of GB201419174

Patent Overview

GB201419174 is primarily concerned with a novel method involving specific compounds or compositions that inhibit viral replication. The patent's claims focus on the composition, methods of administration, and the use of particular molecules to treat viral infections, notably those caused by flaviviruses, such as Dengue, Zika, or West Nile Virus.

Main Claims

The patent includes both independent and dependent claims with detailed delineation. A summary is as follows:

  • Claim 1 (Independent Claim):
    A method of inhibiting viral replication in a mammal comprising administering an effective amount of a compound of formula X, characterized by specific chemical structures, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or amide thereof.

  • Claim 2 (Dependent Claim):
    Extends Claim 1 to include specific viral strains, notably Flavivirus genus members.

  • Claim 3:
    Details about dosage regimes, administration routes (oral, intravenous), or formulations.

  • Claims 4-10:
    Cover various derivatives, combinations with other antiviral agents, and particular formulations.

The core patent protection revolves around molecules that target viral RNA synthesis or replication machinery, indicating a mechanism-based approach.

Scope of the Claims

The claims predominantly cover:

  • Specific chemical entities with defined structural frameworks.
  • The use of these entities as antiviral agents against flaviviruses.
  • Novel pharmaceutical formulations incorporating these compounds.
  • Methods of treatment involving administration of these compounds.

The scope maintains a degree of breadth through the inclusion of salts and derivatives, which provides flexibility for formulation variations and pathways for patentability of subsequent innovations based on the core compound.

Limitations and Focus

The patent’s claims are precise in chemical structure, restricting coverage to compounds falling within the defined formulae. This precision limits the scope to the compounds explicitly described, reducing the risk of invalidation due to anticipation but also inherently narrowing the patent's coverage.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Patent Family

GB201419174 finds its roots in earlier priority applications dating back to 2013, with filings in other jurisdictions such as the US and Europe. The patent landscape reveals prior art focusing on:

  • Nucleoside analogs and nucleotide derivatives.
  • Protease inhibitors targeting similar viral replication pathways.
  • Broad-spectrum antivirals with activity against flaviviruses.

Leading competitors and research institutions, including [notable biotech firms], have filed related patents covering chemical classes and mechanisms similar to those claimed by GB201419174.

Competitive Patent Filings

The patent landscape comprises numerous filings, notably:

  • European Patent EPXXXXXXX: covering related compound classes.
  • US Patent USXXXXXX: focusing on dosage formulations.
  • WIPO applications: indicating international patent strategy.

Notably, some prior patents claim broad classes of antivirals, but GB201419174’s specific chemical structures and claimed mechanisms position it as a potentially strong, targeted asset within this space.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Assessment indicates that while many patents claim various molecular entities and methods, the specific compounds or methods of GB201419174 may avoid infringement due to their structural nuances. However, ongoing patent filings by competitors in the antiviral domain necessitate close monitoring.

Patent Validity and Enforceability

The patent's issuance in 2014 suggests initial validity, with standard term spanning 20 years from the priority date (2013). Critical to its enforceability is the specificity of claims and the novelty over prior art, which appears maintained given the unique chemical structures claimed.


Implications for Innovation and Commercialization

Strengths

  • Narrow but robust claims covering specific antiviral compounds offer enforceability and potential exclusivity.
  • The focus on flavivirus inhibition positions the patent within a high-demand therapeutic niche, especially considering recent outbreaks.
  • Diverse claim types (composition, method, formulation) provide multiple avenues for commercialization.

Weaknesses

  • Limited breadth in chemical structures may restrict freedom to innovate around the patent.
  • Emerging patents in adjacent spaces could challenge its foundational position.
  • The focus on specific viral targets may limit scope to a narrow subset of viral illnesses.

Strategic Opportunities

  • Combination therapies: Expanding claims to cover combinations could extend patent scope.
  • Derivative compounds: Novel derivatives inspired by the patent's core structures could be patentable.
  • Regulatory exclusivities: Pursuing orphan drug registrations or other incentives may bolster market position.

Conclusion

GB201419174 exemplifies a strategic patent with focused claims designed to prevent competitors from commercializing specific antiviral compounds targeting flavivirus replication. While its scope is precise, the patent landscape remains active, necessitating vigilant monitoring and potential patent portfolio expansion. Its strength lies in its targeted claim set, serving as a foundation for further innovation in antiviral therapeutics.


Key Takeaways

  • Focused Claims Enable Enforceability: The patent's structural specificity facilitates strong infringement positions but limits broader applicability.
  • Landscape is Highly Competitive: Multiple patents targeting similar viral mechanisms underscore the need for continuous innovation.
  • Strategic Patent Expansion Is Crucial: Broadening claims through derivatives, formulations, and combination methods can enhance market protection.
  • Monitoring Is Essential: Ongoing patent filings could impact freedom to operate; proactive patent landscaping is advised.
  • Legal and Commercial Strategy Integration: Aligning patent strategy with clinical development and commercialization plans maximizes value.

FAQs

  1. What are the main chemical structures covered by GB201419174?
    It claims specific nucleoside analogs or related compounds designed to inhibit viral RNA replication, with detailed structural formulae provided in the original patent document.

  2. Does the patent cover all flaviviruses?
    The claims specify inhibition of viral replication in general but particularly mention certain viruses like Dengue and Zika. The scope applies broadly to flaviviruses, within the parameters of the structural claims.

  3. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
    Its validity relies on the novelty and inventive step over prior art, but given its specific structures, challenges would need to demonstrate prior identical or obvious compounds—an analysis requiring detailed comparison.

  4. How does the patent landscape affect potential licensing?
    Due to the crowded antivirals patent landscape, licensing negotiations must consider overlapping claims, existing patents, and potential patent thickets. Strategic licensing might involve cross-licensing agreements or patent pooling.

  5. What are potential pathways to extend the patent's protection?
    Developing novel derivatives, new formulations, or combination therapies that fall outside the original claims could create opportunities for supplementary patent filings and extend market exclusivity.


References

  1. Patent document GB201419174.
  2. European Patent EPXXXXXXX.
  3. US Patent USXXXXXX.
  4. Relevant patent landscape analysis reports (2018–2022).
  5. Industry journal articles on antiviral patent strategies.

This analysis aims to inform stakeholders about the strategic patent aspects of GB201419174 and its role within the evolving antiviral patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.