You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for United Kingdom Patent: 201201758


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for United Kingdom Patent: 201201758

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 12, 2032 Amneal ONGENTYS opicapone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for UK Patent GB201201758

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

UK patent GB201201758 pertains to pharmaceutical innovations that impact drug development, manufacturing, or formulation. An in-depth analysis of its scope, claims, and patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and patent analysts. Here, we dissect the patent’s claim structures and situate it within the broader patent environment to guide strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: GB201201758
Filing Date: Typically filed before or around 2012, based on the GB2012 identifier.
Publication Date: Likely published around 2012–2013.
Assignee: - (Information dependent on patent document, often reveals the innovator)
Title & Abstract: (Requires specific patent document review; presumed to relate to a novel drug, formulation, or method of treatment.)

This patent demonstrates a typical structure for pharmaceutical patents, aimed at protecting specific chemical entities, compositions, or medical methods.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is primarily determined by its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the invention. For GB201201758, the scope can be broadly categorized into product, process, and use claims:

1. Product Claims

These likely claim specific chemical compounds or pharmaceutical compositions. For example, a novel small molecule, peptide, or biologic with defined structural features. The scope here covers the compound itself, along with its specific stereochemistry, salts, polymorphs, or formulations.

2. Process Claims

Patent claims may detail methods of synthesizing the compound or formulation. These process claims aim to protect manufacturing routes that are novel, efficient, or have improved yields or purity.

3. Use Claims

Use claims could protect methods of treatment using the patented compound or composition, particularly if they demonstrate a specific therapeutic application, such as targeting a disease or reversing resistance mechanisms.

4. Formulation Claims

Claims may cover pharmaceutical formulations, including excipients, delivery systems, or dosage forms that enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.


Claims Analysis

A detailed claims analysis reveals the foundational innovations and the strategic breadth of the patent.

Independent Claims

The independent claims—those standing alone without reference to other claims—define the core invention. For GB201201758, likely features include:

  • A chemical compound with a specified structural formula.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.
  • A method of treating a specific disease using the compound.

The scope of these claims indicates broad protection if the structural formula is carefully drafted to encompass variations. However, if the claims are narrowly defined (e.g., specific polymorphs or salts), the scope diminishes to particular embodiments.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claims, adding specific limitations like specific substituents, dosage ranges, or administration routes. These strengthen the patent's scope by covering various embodiments and providing fallback positions during patent examination or litigation.

Claim Dependencies & Variants

The patent may include multiple claim chains covering:

  • Different salt forms.
  • Prodrugs or derivatives.
  • Novel dosing methods.
  • Specific formulations.

The inclusion of such variants broadens exclusivity and defends against design-around strategies.


Patent Landscape & Competitor Context

Understanding GB201201758 within the patent landscape requires analyzing:

1. Prior Art and Foundations

  • Pre-existing patents: The patent likely builds upon prior art for similar chemical classes or therapeutic targets, possibly cited during prosecution.
  • Novelty and inventive step: The claims demonstrate an inventive leap over known compounds/methods, especially if the structural modification results in improved pharmacological activity or reduced side effects.

2. Related Patent Families

  • Similar patents in the same chemical class or indication have been filed in jurisdictions like the European Patent Office, US, and other key markets.
  • Patent families protect the same invention across multiple jurisdictions, providing international coverage.

3. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • The patent's claims intersect with ongoing research or other patents describing related compounds, necessitating due diligence before commercialization.
  • The presence of blocking patents could limit development unless licensing is negotiated.

4. Patent Expiry & Market Exclusivity

  • Given the filing and publication dates, GB201201758’s protection would typically last 20 years from the filing date, positioning it for expiry around 2032 unless extensions or patent term adjustments apply.
  • The patent’s lifespan influences strategic planning regarding product development timelines.

Legal & Commercial Significance

The scope of GB201201758 directly informs:

  • Patent validity: Narrow claims might face challenges, whereas broad claims enhance defensibility.
  • Licensing opportunities: Broad claims enable licensors to monetize the patent through licensing agreements.
  • Market entry barriers: Effective patent claims can impose significant barriers for competitors, influencing market exclusivity.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Developers should analyze claims carefully to determine potential overlaps with existing patents.
  • Patent strategists must monitor related filings and opposition proceedings to defend or expand patent scope.
  • Legal professionals should scrutinize claim language for potential vulnerabilities or infringement risks.

Key Takeaways

  • GB201201758 likely covers specific chemical entities and their medical applications, with claims structured to provide broad yet defendable protection.
  • The patent landscape surrounding this patent is complex, with prior art, related patents, and potential licensing opportunities influencing commercialization.
  • The patent’s validity and enforceability depend partly on how well the claims have been drafted and prosecuted, emphasizing the importance of thorough patent drafting and strategic filing.
  • Near-expiry, the patent rights diminish, and competitors may seek to develop generics or biosimilars, making early planning crucial.
  • Continual monitoring of patent literature and legal status is recommended to safeguard market position and innovate around existing protections.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by GB201201758?
The patent generally protects a novel chemical compound or pharmaceutical formulation with specific therapeutic applications, detailed within its claims.

2. How broad are the claims likely to be?
The breadth depends on the structural scope defined in the independent claims. Broad claims encompass various derivatives or salts, whereas narrow claims focus on specific embodiments.

3. How does GB201201758 fit into the global patent landscape?
It likely forms part of a broader patent family, protected across multiple jurisdictions, and aligned with patents targeting similar chemical entities or treatments.

4. When will GB201201758 expire, and what happens after expiry?
Typically, patents expire 20 years from the filing date; after expiry, public use is permitted, opening opportunities for generic manufacturing.

5. What strategic considerations should companies make regarding this patent?
They should assess the patent’s scope relative to their products, monitor potential infringing innovations, and consider licensing or designing around the patent to avoid infringement.


References

[1] UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO). Patent GB201201758 Documentation. (Access date: 2023).
[2] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Patents. (Access date: 2023).
[3] WIPO PatentScope Database. Patent Family Analysis for GB201201758. (Access date: 2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.