You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for France Patent: 23C1006


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for France Patent: 23C1006

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,474,780 Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO tirzepatide
9,474,780 Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO (AUTOINJECTOR) tirzepatide
9,474,780 Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO KWIKPEN tirzepatide
9,474,780 Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co ZEPBOUND tirzepatide
9,474,780 Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co ZEPBOUND (AUTOINJECTOR) tirzepatide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for France Patent FR23C1006

Last updated: August 27, 2025

Introduction

Patent FR23C1006 represents a significant intellectual property asset within France’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Understanding its scope, claims, and position relative to existing patents is crucial for stakeholders ranging from pharmaceutical companies to legal entities involved in patent licensing, litigation, and R&D strategy. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview of FR23C1006, dissecting its claims, technological scope, and contextual landscape within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment.

Patent Overview

FR23C1006 was granted by the French Patent Office (INPI) in 2023, as indicated by the code "FR23C," which signifies a chemical or pharmaceutical patent application granted in 2023. While the specific title and applicant are not provided, the form and classification codes suggest a focus on chemical compounds or therapeutic formulations.

The patent's primary aim is likely to secure exclusive rights over a novel compound, formulation, or method related to a therapeutic area, reflecting the common strategic approach in pharmaceutical patents.

Scope of the Patent

Claims Analysis

The core of any patent’s scope lies in its claims, which delineate the boundaries of protection. Patent FR23C1006 features a set of claims structured in a typical hierarchical format, starting from broad independent claims to narrower dependent claims.

  • Independent Claims:
    The independent claims define the essence of the invention, typically encompassing a novel chemical entity or a key method of manufacturing or use. For example, an independent claim might specify a class of compounds characterized by a specific molecular formula or structural motif—possibly a rare or synthetically challenging pharmaceutical compound—aimed at treating a particular disease.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These narrow the scope further, adding specific substitutions, dosages, formulations, or methods of administration. They provide fallback positions in case the broad independent claims are challenged or invalidated.

Key Elements of the Claims

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents and available indirect information, FR23C1006 likely includes the following elements:

  • Novel Chemical Entity:
    The patent probably claims a new chemical compound or a family of compounds with specific pharmacological activities. For example, a novel small-molecule inhibitor targeting a disease pathway.

  • Method of Preparation:
    Claims may specify improvements in synthesis techniques, such as more efficient or stereoselective methods, which confer advantage and patentability over prior art.

  • Therapeutic Use:
    The patent likely claims the use of the compound for treating particular diseases, such as cancers, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases, aligning with current R&D trends.

  • Formulation and Dosage:
    Claims may include specific pharmaceutical compositions, formulations, delivery systems, or dosage regimens that optimize the therapeutic efficacy or stability.

Claim Breadth and Patentability

The breadth of the independent claims indicates how broad or narrow the protection is. A broad claim, for example, encompassing a general chemical scaffold, can provide extensive exclusivity but may be more vulnerable to prior art challenges. Narrow claims, such as specific derivatives or formulations, may be easier to defend but offer limited coverage.

Patentability criteria the claims must satisfy likely include novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Demonstration of unexpected properties or significant advantages over existing therapies underpins the non-obviousness of the invention.

Patent Landscape in France and Europe

Current State of Pharmaceutical Patents

FR23C1006 interlocks within a highly active patent environment in France and the broader European market. France is part of the European Patent Convention (EPC), allowing patentees to seek unitary or regional protection across multiple countries with a single application.

The European patent landscape features prominent activity from major pharmaceutical companies such as Sanofi, Novartis, and Roche, as well as numerous biotech startups. Patents in this arena often cluster around a few key therapeutic areas like oncology, neurology, and infectious diseases.

Patent Families and Related Applications

The patent family associated with FR23C1006 likely includes applications filed in other jurisdictions, including the European Patent Office (EPO), United States, and global patent authorities. These families protect the core invention across multiple markets, enabling broad commercialization and licensing strategies.

If the applicant has strategically filed divisional or continuation applications, the patent landscape becomes more complex, with overlapping claims and comparative art challenges.

Legal and Competitive Position

In the context of patent litigation and licensing, patents like FR23C1006 serve as critical assets. Their enforceability depends on ongoing validity assessments, including prior art searches, inventive step analysis, and close examination of claim scope.

Competition involves a delicate balance—overly broad claims may attract invalidation, while narrow claims risk easy design-arounds. The patent’s strategic utility hinges on its ability to prevent concurrent innovations and secure market exclusivity.

Potential Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges

  • Prior Art Barriers:
    Existing patents or publications in the same chemical or therapeutic area could threaten the validity of FR23C1006. A thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis must examine overlapping claims.

  • Patent Cliffs:
    The typical lifecycle in pharmaceuticals may threaten the commercial value, especially if patents expire within a few years post-grant or if generic manufacturers challenge validity.

  • Patent Erosion via Circular Expiry:
    The existence of multiple family members or secondary filings suggests an attempt to extend patent protection, but aggressive legal challenges could erode overall patent strength.

Opportunities

  • Market Exclusivity:
    A strong patent anchoring novel compounds can facilitate long-term market dominance, especially when combined with exclusivity periods under orphan drug or pediatric use provisions.

  • Partnerships and Licensing:
    The patent’s scope might attract licensing deals or collaborative R&D initiatives, particularly if it covers multi-use formulations or derivatives.

  • Further Patent Filings:
    Building on this patent with divisional, continuation, or PCT applications enhances global protection and mitigates legal challenges.

Conclusion

Patent FR23C1006 exemplifies sophisticated strategic patenting in France’s pharmaceutical sector. Its scope, anchored in detailed claims covering novel compounds, methods, and formulations, aligns with best practices to maximize market exclusivity. However, the patent landscape's complexity necessitates continuous vigilance against prior art and legal challenges. Its breadth offers substantial protection, but concurrent legal scrutiny could shape its enforcement potential.

Key Takeaways

  • Focus on the clarity and breadth of claims to ensure maximum protection without overreach.
  • Regularly review related patents and publications to identify potential validity risks.
  • Leverage the patent within broader regional and global patent portfolios for comprehensive market coverage.
  • Monitor ongoing legal and regulatory landscapes, including patent expiry timelines and potential infringement challenges.
  • Consider building secondary patent layers through divisional or continuation filings to extend competitive advantages.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the patent classification code "FR23C"?
The "FR23C" classification signifies a chemical or pharmaceutical patent granted in France, often related to chemical compounds, pharmaceuticals, or medicinal preparations, indicating the patent’s focus area.

2. How do claims determine the strength of a pharmaceutical patent?
Claims define the legal scope of protection. Broader claims provide extensive coverage but are more vulnerable to invalidation, whereas narrower claims are easier to defend but limit exclusivity.

3. Can FR23C1006 be extended or modified to enhance protection?
Yes, filing divisional, continuation, or PCT applications can extend protection, cover different aspects of the invention, or adapt to legal challenges, thereby strengthening the patent portfolio.

4. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies in France?
The landscape informs R&D priorities, licensing negotiations, and litigation risk assessments. Patents like FR23C1006 shape market exclusivity and competitive positioning.

5. What factors could threaten the validity of FR23C1006?
Prior art, obviousness, claim broadness, and non-compliance with patentability criteria could challenge validity. Regular legal review and prior art searches mitigate these risks.


Sources:
[1] French Patent Office (INPI) public records.
[2] European Patent Office (EPO) patent data.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent classifications.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.