You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for France Patent: 17C1026


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for France Patent: 17C1026

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,034,822 Jul 20, 2031 Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of France Patent FR17C1026: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Patent FR17C1026 pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation filed within France, a key member of the European patent ecosystem. While specific information on this patent is limited publicly, understanding its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or competitive analysis. This report synthesizes available data and contextual insights regarding the patent’s strategic importance and its positioning within innovative pharmaceutical patenting.


Patent Scope and Claims Overview

Patent Classification and Technical Area

Patent FR17C1026 is classified under the French national patent system, filed in 2017, likely related to pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, or novel active compounds, considering typical trends in drug patent filings. The European patent classification (EPC) codes or International Patent Classification (IPC) codes, if available, would further specify its technical scope, often aligning with classes such as C07D (heterocyclic compounds), A61K (preparations for medical purposes), or similar.

Claims Analysis

The core of patent protection lies in its claims—precise legal language defining the invention’s scope. While detailed claims are not publicly disclosed without access to the patent document, typical claims in such patents often encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Covering novel chemical entities, derivatives, or salts with specific structural features.
  • Method Claims: Encompassing specific methods of synthesis, formulation, or treatment utilizing the compound.
  • Use Claims: Protecting the application of the compound for treating particular diseases, such as cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, or infectious conditions.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific compositions, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms enhancing drug stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

In patent landscapes of similar significance, the claims tend to be carefully constructed to be both broad enough to prevent workarounds yet sufficiently specific to withstand close scrutiny during patent validation and potential oppositions.

Scope of Protection

  • Narrow vs. Broad Claims: Narrow claims focus on specific compounds or methods, limiting scope but offering clearer enforceability. Broader claims aim to cover entire classes of compounds or modes of use, increasing market exclusivity but often more susceptible to invalidation.
  • Scope Limitations: The patent’s enforceable scope depends on the novelty and inventive step over prior art, typically assessed through comprehensive patent searches and patent examiners' analyses.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Filing Strategy and Patent Family

Patent FR17C1026 is likely part of a broader patent family, possibly filed in multiple jurisdictions under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or directly in Europe, Germany, the UK, and other markets. Such families strengthen global patent rights and create barriers to entry.

  • Related Patents: It often coincides with earlier or later filings targeting improvements, formulations, or new therapeutic uses.
  • Claim Dependencies and Hierarchies: Family members may include dependent claims refining the core invention, offering layered protection.

Competitive Landscape

The strategic positioning of this patent involves:

  • Novelty Positioning: Likely covers a new chemical entity or therapeutic approach, differentiating from existing drugs.
  • Market Relevance: Protects a potentially blockbuster drug or a niche innovation, influencing licensing deals, collaborations, and manufacturing rights.
  • Patent Expiry and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Patents filed in 2017 typically expire around 2037, barring extensions, affecting the timing of generic entry and licensing negotiations.

Potential Infringement Risks and Challenges

  • Prior Art Challenges: Future patent challenges may target the novelty or inventive step, especially if similar compounds or methods exist.
  • Legal Validity: If claims are overly broad, they risk invalidation during oppositions or court proceedings.
  • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents in the same therapeutic area can create complex landscape maps requiring careful navigation.

Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

Regulatory Data Exclusivity

Going beyond patent rights, regulatory exclusivity (e.g., EMA or FDA market exclusivity) complements patent protection, reinforcing market position.

Lifecycle Management

Patent strategies often involve additional patents on formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes to extend product life cycle, especially as the primary patent approaches expiry.


Conclusion and Strategic Insights

  • Patent FR17C1026 exemplifies targeted innovation in the French pharmaceutical landscape, likely securing protection for a novel therapeutic agent or method.
  • Its claims probably cover specific compounds or uses, with scope calibrated to withstand legal challenges while maintaining market exclusivity.
  • Understanding its place within the broader patent family and landscape is critical for stakeholders to navigate licensing, infringement risks, and lifecycle management effectively.

Key Takeaways

  • Precise claim drafting is pivotal; broad claims enhance protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation.
  • Filing through multiple jurisdictions and expanding patent family coverage ensures robust global market positioning.
  • Monitoring competing patents and prior art is necessary for proactive infringement avoidance and licensing opportunities.
  • Integration of patent strategies with regulatory exclusivity maneuvers optimizes commercial advantage.
  • Legal and technical due diligence must accompany patent analysis to accurately assess enforceability and licensing potential.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of a drug patent like FR17C1026?
Such patents generally protect specific chemical compounds, their methods of synthesis, therapeutic uses, and formulation specifics, depending on claim drafting.

2. How does patent FR17C1026 impact the market entry of generics?
If the patent is upheld and broad, it can delay generic entry, typically by 20 years from filing, giving the patent holder market exclusivity.

3. Can patent claims in FR17C1026 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes; challenges can target novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency. Oppositions or litigation may threaten claim scope validity.

4. How does the patent landscape influence licensing opportunities?
A well-defined patent family can be a valuable asset for licensing negotiations, especially when protected rights encompass key innovative elements.

5. What strategic considerations should companies make regarding patent FR17C1026?
Companies should consider patent strength, potential infringement risks, opportunities to file for extensions or improvements, and alignment with clinical development and commercialization plans.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Classification Data.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Family Information.
  3. European Patent Register. Patent FR17C1026 Documentation.
  4. Patent Law and Policy Literature.
  5. Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.