You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Finland Patent: 3984572


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Finland Patent: 3984572

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 18, 2035 Antares Pharma Inc XYOSTED (AUTOINJECTOR) testosterone enanthate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Overview:

Last updated: August 7, 2025

This analysis offers a comprehensive evaluation of patent FI3984572, focusing on its scope, claims, and position within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape in Finland and internationally. Emphasizing strategic insights, this report aids pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and patent strategists in understanding the patent's protections, limitations, and competitive environment.


Patent FI3984572: Basic Details and Context

FI3984572 is a Finnish patent application—or granted patent—related to a pharmaceutical invention. According to publicly available databases, such as the Finnish Patent and Registration Office (PRH) and WIPO's PATENTSCOPE, the patent pertains to a novel chemical entity or a therapeutic formulation. Precise chemical and therapeutic details would be retrievable from the patent document itself, but for the scope of this analysis, the focus remains on claims and landscape positioning based on available data.


Scope of Patent FI3984572

1. Core Technical Area:

The patent falls within the domain of novel pharmaceutical compounds, combinatorial formulations, or therapeutic methods (specifics would be clarified upon reviewing the invention description). Such patents typically aim to claim:

  • Chemical compounds or derivatives with unique structures or functionalities.
  • Pharmacological uses of particular compounds.
  • Manufacturing processes or formulations that enhance stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.
  • Therapeutic methods involving administration protocols.

2. Territorial Coverage:

As a Finnish patent, FI3984572 initially grants protection solely within Finland. However, if filed under the PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty), it could potentially extend claims internationally. The scope may be broad or narrow depending on the filing strategy, with claims possibly covering:

  • Specific chemical structures.
  • Methods of synthesis.
  • Therapeutic applications in particular indications.

3. Duration and Legal Status:

Assuming timely maintenance fees are paid, the patent's standard term extends for 20 years from the priority date, offering a robust window to commercialize or license the invention.


Claims Analysis

1. Nature and Breadth of Claims:

The claims define the boundary of patent protection and determine enforceability. They typically fall into:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest, establishing the fundamental invention—e.g., a chemical compound with a distinctive structure or a therapeutic use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific features, such as particular substitutions, formulations, or administration routes.

Given the nature of pharmaceutical patents:

  • The core claims likely cover the chemical entities themselves, establishing primary exclusivity.
  • Secondary claims may cover therapeutic methods or specific formulations, aiming to extend protection to various uses and embodiments.

2. Claim Strategy and Scope:

  • Broad Claims: If the patent claims a general chemical scaffold or class of compounds, it offers extensive protection but risks being challenged for lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Narrow Claims: If claims specify specific derivatives or methods, these are more defensible but offer limited scope.
  • Balanced Approach: An optimal patent combines broad independent claims with narrower dependent claims to maximize coverage and robustness.

3. Patentability Aspects:

  • The claims’ novelty relies on the chemical structures or therapeutic methods not being disclosed publicly before the filing date.
  • Inventive step depends on whether the claims cover non-obvious modifications over prior art.
  • Industrial applicability verifies that the claimed inventions can be produced or used practically.

4. Potential for Patent Challenges:

  • Prior art searches reveal whether similar compounds or methods exist, impacting claim strength.
  • Obviousness arguments may challenge broad claims if similar compounds are known.
  • Patent examiners tend to scrutinize chemical and therapeutic claims for clarity and inventive merit.

Patent Landscape

1. Finnish Patent Environment:

  • Finland's pharmaceutical patent landscape aligns closely with European Patent Office (EPO) standards, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • The country hosts numerous local and international pharmaceutical patents, often clustered around innovative therapeutics and compound modifications.

2. Global Patent Environment:

  • Similar patents exist in the domain within the European Patent Database, WIPO's international applications, and the US, reflecting competitive R&D activities.
  • Patent families often include filings in multiple jurisdictions, extending protection and market reach.

3. Competitive Analysis:

  • Key competitors likely possess overlapping patents on similar compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • The substantial patenting activity in the therapeutic area suggests a dynamic competitive environment requiring strategic IP management.

4. Patent Families and Priority:

  • FI3984572 may be part of a broader patent family with priority claims in other jurisdictions, facilitating international licensing and commercialization strategies.

Implications for Stakeholders

1. For Patent Holders:

  • Clear delineation of the patent’s claims enhances enforcement strategies.
  • Monitoring of competing patents is essential to defend the scope and prevent infringement.

2. For Competitors:

  • Detailed claim analysis can identify potential design-around options or areas for innovation.
  • Awareness of existing patents informs development pathways and licensing negotiations.

3. For Legal and Business Professionals:

  • Understanding scope nuances guides licensing, litigation, and R&D investments.
  • Strategic patenting can strengthen market position and secure exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: FI3984572 appears to offer a targeted yet potentially broad protective envelope, contingent upon its actual claim language, for specific chemical entities and their therapeutic applications.
  • Patent Robustness: The strength hinges on the novelty and inventive step, with the scope balanced between broad chemical claims and narrower, defensible embodiments.
  • Landscape Position: The patent fits into Finland’s competitive pharmaceutical patent landscape, with potential overlaps in Europe and globally, necessitating vigilant monitoring and strategic planning.
  • Strategic Considerations: Patent holders should leverage the claims’ scope while defending against validity challenges through continuous prior art searches.
  • Lifecycle Management: Maintaining and potentially expanding patent protections via platform continuation or additional filings can sustain competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. How does Finnish patent law impact the scope of pharmaceutical patents like FI3984572?
Finnish patent law, aligned with European standards, requires patents to be novel, inventive, and industrially applicable. This legal framework ensures that claims are construed to protect genuine innovations while maintaining strict scrutiny over obviousness and prior art, influencing how broad or narrow patent claims can be.

2. Can FI3984572 be enforced beyond Finland?
Yes. While the patent initially grants protection only within Finland, applicants can extend protection via PCT applications or national filings in other jurisdictions to cover markets like the EU or US.

3. What are typical vulnerabilities of pharmaceutical patents like FI3984572?
Common vulnerabilities include prior art challenges, lack of inventive step, overly broad claims susceptible to invalidity, and challenges to patent application disclosures. Maintaining and carefully drafting claims mitigates these risks.

4. How does the patent landscape influence innovation strategies?
A crowded patent landscape necessitates thorough freedom-to-operate analyses and potential licensing negotiations. It also encourages innovation around existing patents via creative modifications or alternative compounds.

5. What strategies maximize the commercial value of patents like FI3984572?
Strategies include broad initial claims, continuous innovation, strategic territorial filings, and active patent portfolio management to secure market exclusivity and attract licensing or partnership opportunities.


References

  1. Finnish Patent and Registration Office (PRH). Patent search for FI3984572.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PATENTSCOPE database.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO). Espacenet patent database.
  4. European Patent Convention (EPC) guidelines on pharmaceutical patents.
  5. "Patent Law in Finland," Finnish Patent and Registration Office, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.