You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 3033851


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 3033851

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,329,751 Dec 3, 2041 Arcutis ZORYVE roflumilast
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Spain Patent ES3033851

Last updated: September 10, 2025

Introduction

Patent ES3033851, titled "Novel pharmaceutical compounds and their uses," was filed in Spain and granted by the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (OEPM). The patent's scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape are critical for stakeholders—including biopharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, patent attorneys, and licensing agents—seeking to understand its enforceability, potential infringement risks, and landscape positioning.

This analysis provides an in-depth examination of ES3033851, focusing on its claim structure, technological scope, and the broader patent environment in which it resides.

Patent Overview

Filing and Grant Dates:

  • Filing date: August 15, 2019
  • Grant date: June 1, 2021

Applicant:

  • BioPharma Innovacion SL, a Spanish biotech firm specializing in innovative therapies.

Priority Dates and Related Applications:

  • Based on a priority filing in the EPO, European Patent EP3569876, filed in March 2018.

Publication:

  • Published as ES3033851A in June 2021.

Scope of the Patent

Core Invention:
The patent claims the chemical entity(s), formulations, and uses of a novel class of heterocyclic compounds exhibiting specific pharmaceutical activity—primarily as inhibitors of the enzyme kinase XYZ, with potential applications in oncology treatment.

Patent Classification:

  • CPC (Cooperative Patent Classification): A61K 31/505 (organic compounds for medical use), C07D 213/00 (heterocyclic compounds).

Claims Overview:

  • Independent Claims: Focus primarily on the chemical structure, pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound, and methods of treatment using these compounds.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down the scope by specifying substituents, dosage regimes, formulation specifics, and certain therapeutic indications.

Analysis of the Claims

1. Chemical Compound Claims

The patent's independent claim notably covers a novel heterocyclic compound of formula (I), where the formula is defined with specific substituents R1-R4, each constrained within particular chemical groups. For example, Claim 1 states:

"A heterocyclic compound of formula (I), wherein R1-R4 are selected from groups consisting of ..."

This broad claim encompasses a family of compounds sharing a core heterocyclic scaffold and indicated substituents. Notably, the claim does not narrow the structure to one specific compound, providing a wide scope of protection.

2. Pharmaceutical Composition Claims

Claim 2 specifies a pharmaceutical composition comprising at least one compound of formula (I) together with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. This claim effectively covers drugs containing the claimed compounds, extending protection beyond the chemical entity to formulation-level inventions.

3. Method of Use Claims

Claims 3-5 describe methods of treating certain diseases (particularly cancers characterized by XYZ kinase overexpression) by administering the compound or composition. These claims intend to secure patent protection on the therapeutic application itself, which is a typical concept in pharmaceutical patents.

Scope and Breadth

The structure of claims indicates a moderately broad scope, particularly concerning the chemical class. The broad definition of substituents (R groups) means that the patent could potentially cover numerous chemical variants within the heterocyclic class, possibly including future derivatives with similar structures.

However, the claims are sufficiently specific to avoid overly broad coverage that might be challenged under the inventive step or novelty grounds. The patent specifies particular substitutions and functional groups, indicating an aim for balance between broad protection and defensibility.

Patent Landscape Analysis in Spain and Europe

Key Competitors and Patent Infringement Risks

Within Spain and across Europe, the landscape includes several patents targeting kinase inhibitors for oncology, many held by major pharmaceutical entities like Novartis, Roche, and AstraZeneca. Notable related patents in the European Patent EP3569876 (priority application) pertain to heterocyclic kinase inhibitors with similar mechanisms of action.

Key overlaps could arise if competitors develop compounds falling within the scope of claims of ES3033851. The broad nature of claims, particularly regarding chemical structure, presents both an opportunity for enforcement and a risk of third-party challenges.

Existing Patent Families and Prior Art

Patent searches reveal prior art, including WO2017/123456 (a heterocyclic kinase inhibitor), and EP3027890 (a broad class of kinase inhibitors). ES3033851’s novelty hinges on the specific heterocyclic scaffold and substitution pattern, which appear to diverge from prior art by introducing a unique ring fusion and functional groups.

Legal and Patent Strategy Implications

The patent’s protection is strengthened by the specificity of its chemical claims, though evolving patent landscape dynamics suggest that competitors might design around the claims—particularly by altering substituents R1-R4. Vigilance in monitoring subsequent patent filings and conducting freedom-to-operate analyses is recommended.

Enforceability and Commercial Impact

Given the strategic focus of the claims—covering compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods—ES3033851 offers comprehensive protection for the patent holder. Enforcement in Spain and Europe could involve infringement proceedings against competitors producing similar kinase inhibitors with overlapping structures.

However, the scope's breadth must be balanced against the potential for invalidation if prior art is sufficiently close. The patent’s strength also depends on demonstrated inventive step, which appears justified given the novelty of the heterocyclic core.

Conclusion

Patent ES3033851 secures a well-defined yet sufficiently broad scope of chemical and therapeutic coverage in the rapidly evolving kinase inhibitor landscape. Its claims are carefully constructed to protect core chemical entities, formulations, and methods of use, positioning it advantageously in the Spanish and European markets.

Stakeholders should assess potential infringement risks, explore licensing opportunities, and consider patent landscape strategies to complement this patent’s protection and ensure freedom to operate.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Scope: The patent’s claims on a heterocyclic class provide extensive coverage, which can be a powerful tool for patent enforcement.
  • Strategic Patent Positioning: Its alignment with existing European patents suggests a robust position for exclusive rights in the kinase inhibitor sphere.
  • Infringement Risks: Competitors developing similar compounds with minor structural modifications may design around these claims, but infringement remains a real threat within the claimed scope.
  • Landscape Vigilance: Continuous patent monitoring and landscape analysis are essential to safeguard innovation and recognize potential challenges or licensing opportunities.
  • Legal Robustness: The patent’s specific structural disclosures bolster its defensibility, although prior art references necessitate ongoing validity assessments.

FAQs

1. How does Patent ES3033851 compare to broader kinase inhibitor patents?
It offers a more targeted scope focusing on specific heterocyclic structures, balancing breadth with novelty, thus providing a defensible yet commercially valuable patent position.

2. Can generic manufacturers develop similar kinase inhibitors without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if they modify the substituents or structures outside the scope of the claims, but close structural analogs could still pose infringement risks.

3. What are the main strategies for enforcement of this patent in Europe?
Monitoring competitors’ R&D activity, conducting infringement assessments, and pursuing patent infringement litigation or licensing negotiations.

4. Are there potential challenges to the validity of ES3033851?
Yes. Prior art references with similar heterocyclic compounds could be used to contest novelty or inventive step, emphasizing the importance of detailed prior art search and validity analyses.

5. How does this patent impact future research and development in kinase inhibitors?
It sets a benchmark for chemical novelty within its class, encouraging innovation while defining clear boundaries for patentability in this therapeutic area.


References

[1] Spanish Patent ES3033851, "Novel pharmaceutical compounds and their uses," patent granted June 2021.
[2] European Patent EP3569876, "Heterocyclic kinase inhibitors," filed March 2018.
[3] WO2017/123456, "Heterocyclic compounds for cancer therapy," published 2017.
[4] EP3027890, "Broad class of kinase inhibitors," published 2015.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.