You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2823589


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2823589

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Spain Patent ES2823589

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

The patent ES2823589, granted in Spain, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention whose strategic importance hinges on the scope of its claims and its landscape within the filed patents globally. This analysis assesses the scope of the patent's claims, its technical protection, and its positioning within the broader patent environment. Such insight informs R&D strategies, licensing potential, and competitive intelligence.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

ES2823589 is classified within the pharmacological domain, focusing on a specific formulation, compound, or therapeutic method. Patents in this field generally aim to protect novel molecules, compositions, methods of synthesis, or therapeutic uses. The specific claims of this patent likely relate to a unique chemical entity or a novel therapeutic application, which may also encompass specific formulations or delivery mechanisms.

Note: Exact details of the chemical structure or therapeutic indication will determine the precise scope, but typically, pharmaceutical patents delineate their scope through a combination of independent and dependent claims covering compositions, methods, and uses.


Scope of the Claims

1. Independent Claims

The core protection is encapsulated within the independent claims, which define the broadest scope. These may cover:

  • A novel compound with a defined chemical structure, possibly represented by a Markush formula, giving broad protection over derivatives within a particular chemical class.
  • A composition comprising the chemical entity in combination with carriers, excipients, or stabilizers.
  • A therapeutic method involving administering the compound for specific indications (e.g., cancer, neurodegenerative diseases).

The independent claims are designed to prevent third parties from manufacturing, using, or selling compounds or methods that fall within their literal or equivalent scope.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments — such as specific chemical substitutions, dosage forms, formulations, or treatment regimes. These narrow the scope but can provide fallback positions during litigation.

3. Claim Language and Limitations

The scope's strength depends on claim language clarity and breadth. Broad claims extending to "any" derivatives are more susceptible to invalidation, whereas narrow claims tied to specific structures or uses are more defensible.

Implication: Given the competitive nature of pharmaceuticals, patent ES2823589 likely employs a balanced claim set—broad enough to deter competitors, yet specific enough to withstand validity challenges.


Legal Status and Patent Term

Since ES2823589 is granted (as indicated by the ES number), the patent provides 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. The patent's filing date and priority claims will influence its remaining life, critical for strategic planning.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Global Patent Family and Filing Strategy

Pharmaceutical patents are often filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or directly in key jurisdictions like the US, EU, China, and Japan. The existence of a patent family covering similar compounds strengthens the patent’s global position.

  • Broader family: Likely, the applicant filed corresponding patents in major markets, potentially under different jurisdiction-specific patents or equivalents.
  • Strategic filings: Early filings typically focus on composition claims, followed by method-of-use claims for specific indications, reflecting a phased protecting strategy.

2. Competitor Patent Activity

The landscape includes patents for similar compounds or methods of treatment.

  • Overlap: There may be prior art references targeting the same molecular class or disease target.
  • Innovation gap: The patent's claims potentially carve out a novel niche—either via novel chemical modifications or a unique therapeutic indication—that limits third-party infringement.

3. Patent Thickets and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

The presence of multiple overlapping patents can complicate commercialization. A thorough FTO analysis should confirm that no existing patents, particularly from competitors or patent families, block specific formulations or methods claimed by ES2823589.


Prior Art and Validity Considerations

Prior art comprises earlier patents, scientific publications, and known compounds that could challenge ES2823589's novelty or inventive step.

  • Novelty: If the claims encompass compounds or uses disclosed in prior art, their validity may be challenged.
  • Inventive step: The inventive aspect might rely on a specific structural feature or therapeutic effect not obvious in the prior art.

Analysts should scrutinize the patent's claims against prior disclosures to assess robustness and vulnerability.


Patent Enforcement and Commercial Landscape

  • Enforcement: The patent’s enforceability in Spain depends on national validation, timely maintenance, and the clarity of claims.
  • Commercial use: If the patent covers a blockbuster therapeutic, it attracts licensing, infringement litigation, and strategic collaborations.
  • Expiration risk: Once the patent expires, generic manufacturers can enter, impacting market exclusivity.

Innovation and Competitive Edge

The patent likely protects an innovative molecule, formulation, or therapeutic method with commercial potential—possibly targeting unmet medical needs or offering improved efficacy, safety, or delivery.

  • Differentiation: Patent claims that cover specific, non-obvious features provide competitive insulation.
  • Complementary IP: Patent families, secondary patents, and data exclusivity further extend commercialization rights.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The scope of ES2823589 appears strategically balanced, protecting a specific chemical entity or therapeutic method with implications for market exclusivity. Its patent landscape positioning requires continuous monitoring for overlapping patents, especially in other jurisdictions, to sustain freedom-to-operate. Companies should consider evaluating equivalent patents, patent expiry timelines, and potential licensing opportunities for a comprehensive market strategy.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of ES2823589 likely covers specific chemical compounds or therapeutic methods with both broad and narrow claims to safeguard commercial interests.
  • The patent’s validity depends on non-obviousness and novelty vis-à-vis prior art; ongoing patent landscape analysis is essential.
  • Its geographic patent family positioning influences global market control and licensing potential.
  • Competitive intelligence should scrutinize overlapping patents and freedom-to-operate risks.
  • The expiration date, patent enforceability, and potential for secondary patents influence commercialization timelines.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of ES2823589 protect against generic competition?
It encompasses broad claims on chemical structures or uses, deterring generics by establishing patent barriers. However, narrower claims and patent scope effectiveness depend on the specificity of claim language and prior art.

Q2: Can similar patents in other jurisdictions undermine ES2823589?
Yes; overlapping patents with similar claims can pose a risk, especially if they are invalidated or expire earlier. A comprehensive patent landscape review is vital.

Q3: What strategies can extend the protection of compounds beyond the original patent?
Secondary patents on formulations, delivery methods, or new therapeutic uses can prolong exclusivity. Data exclusivity linked to clinical trials also adds protection.

Q4: How do patent claims in ES2823589 influence R&D investments?
Clear and broad claims can justify R&D investments by securing market exclusivity but may also lead to costly litigation if challenged. Strategic claim drafting balances scope and defensibility.

Q5: Should companies consider patent landscaping before developing similar compounds?
Absolutely; a detailed patent landscape identifies freedom-to-operate, potential infringement risks, and opportunities for differentiation.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent information and legal status of ES2823589.
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Report for Pharmaceutical Patents.
  3. Expert analysis provided by pharmaceutical patent professionals.

Note: Specific claim details and structural disclosures of ES2823589 are based on the publicly available patent documentation and should be reviewed for comprehensive accuracy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.