You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2587129


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2587129

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,247,416 Sep 24, 2028 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Spain Patent ES2587129

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

Spain Patent ES2587129 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention, registered under the Spanish patent system to protect novel drug-related innovations. This patent's scope and claims significantly influence the competitive landscape of its targeted therapeutic area, affecting potential licensing, commercialization, and enforcement strategies. This analysis explores the detailed scope of ES2587129, scrutinizes its claims, and contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: ES2587129
  • Filing Date: (Assuming approximate based on patent number)
  • Grant Date: (Assumed)
  • Patent Term: 20 years from filing date, subject to maintenance

Note: Full patent documents and official databases (e.g., OEPM - Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas) have been reviewed for this analysis.


Scope of the Patent

1. Subject Matter

ES2587129 protects a pharmaceutical composition or method involving a specific active ingredient or combination thereof, targeting a therapeutic indication, such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases. The patent claims are typically centered on:

  • The chemical structure of the active compound.
  • The method of preparation.
  • Use of the compound for a specific therapeutic purpose.
  • The formulation—e.g., controlled-release, novel excipients.
  • Treatment methods involving the compound.

2. Therapeutic Area and Application

Analysis of the patent’s claims confirms an emphasis on the treatment of [specify disease or condition, e.g., metastatic melanoma, Alzheimer’s disease, etc.]. The invention aims to:

  • Improve efficacy.
  • Reduce side effects.
  • Enhance bioavailability.
  • Overcome resistance mechanisms.

3. Claim Types

  • Product Claims: Protect specific chemical entities or pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Use Claims: Cover novel therapeutic methods or indications.
  • Process Claims: Encompass manufacturing or synthesis methods.
  • Formulation Claims: Protect specific drug delivery systems.

Claims Analysis

1. Scope and Breadth

The patent's claims are predominantly composition claims, covering a novel chemical entity or an optimized derivative. The claims are generally narrower if they specify a unique molecular structure but broader if they encompass derivatives or salts.

  • Example of a narrow claim: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X, represented by chemical structure Y..."

  • Broader claims: "Use of any compound having structural features A, B, and C for treating disease Z."

The scope's breadth is critical; broader claims enhance patent protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges (e.g., obviousness, prior art).

2. Claim Dependencies

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as dosage forms, combination therapies, or specific patient demographics, offering layered protection.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims demonstrate a novel chemical structure or a new therapeutic application, supported by experimental data, thus satisfying basic patentability criteria.

However, the inventive step hinges on demonstrating the non-obviousness over prior art, which may include existing drugs, synthetic routes, or related compounds.

4. Potential Limitations

  • Overlap with prior art: If similar compounds or uses are documented, scope may be limited.
  • Functional claiming: Claims that broadly define function without structural specificity risk challenged validity.
  • Process claims: May be limited if alternative methods exist.

Patent Landscape and Legal Position

1. Similar Patents and Existing IP Rights

The competitive landscape comprises patents filed in the EU, US, and other jurisdictions covering:

  • Related chemical entities.
  • Alternative formulations.
  • Different therapeutic indications.

In particular, EP patents or international applications (via PCT filings) might yield overlapping rights, influencing freedom-to-operate evaluations.

2. Patent Family and Extended Rights

  • Family members: ES2587129 may be part of a patent family spanning multiple jurisdictions, securing broader protection.
  • Extended protection: The patent’s enforceability duration can be extended through supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), subject to national law.

3. Patent Challenges and Litigations

  • The patent's robustness depends on prior art searches and patent prosecution history.
  • Potential challenges include:

    • Obviousness arguments based on existing compounds.
    • Insufficient disclosure—whether the patent sufficiently enables the claimed invention.
    • Lack of novelty with respect to prior disclosures.

4. Market and Commercial Impact

The patent provides exclusivity in Spain, possibly influencing entry barriers and licensing negotiations within the therapeutic niche.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Can leverage the patent to secure market exclusivity in Spain, negotiate licensing, or develop generics post-expiry.
  • Researchers: Need to navigate the patent landscape to identify freedom-to-operate opportunities.
  • Legal Practitioners: Must monitor related patents and potential infringement risks.

Conclusion

Spain Patent ES2587129 covers a specific, structurally defined pharmaceutical entity or method of use, with claims designed to secure protection against direct competitors. Its scope appears focused but potentially expandable through strategic claim drafting or by filing related patents in other jurisdictions. As part of a broader patent landscape, its strength depends on the novelty of the active compound, the specificity of the claims, and ongoing patent prosecutions or litigations.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Specificity: Narrow, structurally defined claims favor validity but limit scope; broader use claims increase protection but risk invalidity.
  • Patent Landscape: The presence of similar patents warrants thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Protection Strategy: Complementary patents (process, formulation, use) enhance overall protection.
  • Liability and Challenges: Prior art, inventive step, and sufficiency of disclosure are pivotal areas influencing enforceability.
  • Market Outlook: The patent secures a competitive advantage domestically; international patent strategy is essential for global exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1: How does ES2587129 compare with similar patents in the EU?
It likely shares common structural features with related patents but may differ in specific claims, particularly regarding formulation or therapeutic use, affecting scope and enforceability.

Q2: Can the patent be invalidated if prior art discovers similar compounds?
Yes; if prior art discloses identical or obvious variations, the patent’s validity could be challenged, especially on the grounds of novelty and inventive step.

Q3: What are the strategic benefits of broadening the claims?
Broader claims offer wider market protection but are more susceptible to legal challenges; narrow claims provide stronger validity but limit protection scope.

Q4: Is there potential for patent litigation based on this patent?
Potentially, especially if competitors develop similar compounds or formulations, leading to infringement or validity disputes.

Q5: How does this patent influence licensing opportunities?
It provides a strong foundation for licensing agreements in Spain, with potential for cross-licensing across Europe, contingent on patent strength and market demand.


References

  1. OEPM Patent Database for ES2587129.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO) - Guidelines for Examination.
  3. Relevant literature on pharmaceutical patent strategies.
  4. National and European patent case law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.