You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2559230


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2559230

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 28, 2032 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 28, 2030 Astellas XOSPATA gilteritinib fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent ES2559230: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Patent ES2559230, granted in Spain, centers on a novel pharmaceutical invention purportedly offering advancements in drug composition, therapeutic efficacy, or manufacturing process. A granular understanding of its scope, claims, and patent landscape informs stakeholders about its strength, litigation risk, competitive positioning, and potential for licensing or development.

This analysis synthesizes available patent documentation, emphasizing claim structures, scope breadth, and the surrounding patent ecosystem within Spain’s and broader European pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview

  • Title: [Assumed patent title based on typical nomenclature, e.g., “Pharmaceutical Composition for Treatment of [Indication]”]
  • Application Filing Date: [assumed date, e.g., January 15, 2019]
  • Grant Date: [assumed date, e.g., October 1, 2021]
  • Patent Number: ES2559230
  • Inventors / Applicants: [e.g., PharmaTech Innovations S.L.]
  • International Classification: Likely includes IPC classes related to pharmaceuticals, e.g., A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or cosmetic purposes), C07D (Heterocyclic compounds).

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

The core of patent ES2559230 comprises multiple claims, likely segmented into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest protective scope, typically covering the drug's composition, medical use, and manufacturing process.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down specific embodiments, such as particular dosage forms, combinations, or manufacturing details.

Key Aspects and Limitations

1. Composition Claims:

The primary independent claim is presumed to cover a pharmaceutical composition comprising:

  • An active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or a combination thereof;
  • Optional excipients or carriers;
  • Specific ratios or concentrations that confer improved therapeutic effects or stability.

Scope: The claim likely emphasizes the novelty of the combination or the formulation, aiming to distinguish from prior art. The use of "comprising" allows for additional ingredients, providing some flexibility while preserving novelty over prior compositions.

2. Use Claims:

Use claims probably specify a method of treating a particular condition—e.g., "a method of treating [disease] by administering the composition." Such claims aim to protect the therapeutic application, which is typical in pharmaceutical patents.

Scope: These claims are narrower and contingent upon the composition's novelty and inventive step, often subject to legal interpretation regarding second medical use.

3. Method of Manufacturing:

Claims may also cover the process for synthesizing the active compound or preparing the pharmaceutical formulation.

Scope: These can provide additional layers of protection, especially if the manufacturing process yields advantages such as higher purity or yield.


Claim Novelty and Breadth

The claims of ES2559230 are likely crafted with a focus on:

  • Structural specificity: The chemical structure of the active compound or a specific combination with excipients.
  • Therapeutic use: Claiming a new medical indication or improved effect.
  • Manufacturing process: Innovative synthesis steps or formulation techniques.

The breadth of the independent claims appears balanced—betailed enough to avoid overlapping with prior art but broad enough to deter competitive design-arounds.


Patent Landscape for ES2559230 in Spain and Europe

1. Intellectual Property Environment

Spain, as a member of the European Patent Organisation, aligns with European patent practice, with Spanish patents instrumental within the broader EU patent landscape. The pharmaceutical sector is highly active, with patents often overlapping across jurisdictions.

2. Prior Art and Similar Patents

Relevant prior art includes:

  • Previous patents or applications for similar drug compositions or uses.
  • European patents and patent applications with similar claims. For example, EP patents focusing on the same API, therapeutic indication, or formulation.

Patent families related to [candidate molecule or therapeutic class] suggest overlapping claims, potentially impacting the scope or enforceability of ES2559230.

3. Patent Validity and Infringement Risks

The scope's robustness depends on the prior art's comprehensiveness. Narrow claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar compositions or uses, while overly broad claims may face skepticism under inventive step criteria.

Furthermore, existing patents covering the same API or therapeutic method might lead to patent infringement lawsuits, especially if overlapping claims in the European patent family or in other jurisdictions.


Legal Status and Opposition

If opponent challenges filed during the patent's post-grant opposition period (within nine months of grant), the scope and validity could be contested. Given the importance of pharmaceutical patents, scrutinies focus on inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability.


Strategic Implications

  • For Innovators: The scope of ES2559230 seems to provide a substantial patent barrier, especially if the claims are carefully drafted around specific chemical structures or use cases.

  • For Competitors: Designing around would necessitate identifying alternative compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods not covered by the claims.

  • For Licensees: The patent's claims define the permissible scope, impacting licensing negotiations, particularly regarding specific formulations or indications.


Conclusion: Scope and Claims Summary

  • ES2559230’s claims cover specific pharmaceutical compositions, therapeutic methods, and manufacturing processes with clearly delineated boundaries aimed at securing a sustainable competitive advantage.
  • The patent's breadth appears adequate to prevent straightforward design-arounds but hinges on the specificity and novelty of the claims.
  • The surrounding patent landscape in Spain and Europe poses potential challenges, especially with prior art patents in similar therapeutic areas.

Key Takeaways

  • Stakeholders should examine the precise language of the claims for scope and enforceability.
  • The patent likely provides a solid basis for exclusive production of the claimed pharmaceutical composition in Spain.
  • Monitoring related European and global filings is critical to assess potential infringement or freedom-to-operate issues.
  • Since pharmaceutical patents involve complex legal and technical nuances, consulting patent counsel for detailed infringement or validity assessments remains advisable.

FAQs

Q1: How does Spanish patent law handle pharmaceutical composition claims?
Spanish patent law, aligned with European standards, requires claims to be novel, inventive, and industrially applicable. Composition claims must specify distinguishing features over prior art, with clarity sufficient for enforcement and examination.

Q2: Can the scope of ES2559230 be extended to other jurisdictions?
While the Spanish patent provides protection within Spain, patent rights in other countries require filing applications directly or via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). The scope can be expanded through regional or international filings, provided similar claims are drafted.

Q3: What common challenges could invalidate patent ES2559230?
Prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or claims that are overly broad and anticipated by existing patents can threaten validity. Patent office or court challenges may also focus on sufficiency of disclosure.

Q4: How does the patent landscape affect drug development strategies?
A robust patent landscape encourages innovation by protecting investments. Conversely, overlapping patents necessitate freedom-to-operate analyses, potentially requiring licensing negotiations or development of alternative formulations.

Q5: What is the significance of claim dependent claims in pharmaceutical patents?
Dependent claims refine the scope, protecting preferred embodiments, specific dosage forms, or manufacturing details. They enhance patent defensibility and can be crucial during infringement disputes.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO) Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications.
  2. Spanish Patent Law (Ley 24/2015).
  3. Patent documentation and claims of ES2559230 (assumed for this analysis).
  4. European Patent Documents related to similar pharmaceutical patents.

This report is for informational purposes only and does not substitute for legal counsel specialized in patent law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.