You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2344700


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2344700

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 2, 2030 Novartis RYDAPT midostaurin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent ES2344700: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Spain

Last updated: August 9, 2025


Introduction

Patent ES2344700 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Spain, with implications for the relevant therapeutic class and market. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of the patent document, exploring its position within the broader patent landscape, potential overlaps, and strategic considerations for stakeholders. An understanding of this patent’s architecture and topical positioning is essential for pharmaceutical companies, IP strategists, and legal practitioners evaluating patent protectability, freedom-to-operate, or licensing opportunities in Spain and beyond.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: ES2344700
Filing & Publication: Filed with the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (OEPM), publication date typically follows national or PCT routes.
Title & Abstract: The patent pertains to an innovative chemical compound, pharmaceutical formulation, or method of use—precise details depend on the submitted application.
Application Type: Likely a standard or supplementary patent application, with potential priorities from international filings.

For this analysis, focus is placed on the patent’s claims, scope, and landscape position derived from public records and typical patent structures used in pharmaceutical patents.


Claims Analysis

Scope of Claims

The claims define the legal boundaries, and their language determines the scope of the patent’s exclusivity. While the exact wording requires review of the issued patent document, generic patterns in pharmaceutical patents provide insight:

  • Independent Claims: Usually articulate a novel chemical entity or a specific pharmaceutical composition/method of use. These claims are the broadest, aiming to cover the core innovation.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, such as specific stereoisomers, dosage forms, or administration regimes.

Claim Types

  • Compound Claims: Cover the specific chemical structure(s) claimed as novel inventions. These are central to patents seeking exclusivity over a new drug molecule.
  • Use Claims: Cover a new therapeutic application of known compounds, extending patent life through ‘second medical use’ claims.
  • Process Claims: Protect specific synthesis methods or manufacturing steps, preventing generic entrants from copying manufacturing techniques.
  • Formulation Claims: Focus on optimized formulations, such as stabilized compositions or targeted delivery systems.

Scope Assessment

  • Breadth of Claims: Reflects an attempt to secure a broad monopoly over the novel compound or use, but subject to prior art constraints.
  • Potential Limitations: Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art demonstrates similar compounds or uses. Narrow claims may be easier to defend but offer less market protection.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Prior Art Considerations

  • The patent landscape in the relevant therapeutic class—be it oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases—must be surveyed.
  • Prior art may include earlier patents or publications on similar compounds, production methods, or therapeutic uses.
  • The novelty and inventive step of ES2344700 likely hinge on structural features, specific formulations, or novel therapeutic claims over existing molecules.

Overlap with Existing Patents and Applications

  • Similar patents in Spain and internationally can threaten validity or prompt licensing negotiations.
  • Spanish patent ES2344700 may have counterparts in Europe or via PCT filings, broadening or constraining its enforcement scope.
  • Notable patent families from major Pharma companies or research institutions may overlap in the claimed chemical space.

Patent Family and Expiry

  • Evaluation of priority date and filing timeline informs the patent’s remaining enforceable life.
  • Typically, pharmaceutical patents filed before 2000 face expiry, but recent filings or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can extend exclusivity.

Technology and Market Position

  • The patent’s claims' specificity indicates whether it offers a stepping stone to an existing or pipeline product.
  • A broad claim set suggests an aggressive IP strategy, positioning the patent as a key barrier to market entry.
  • Narrow, incremental claims may be designed to complement other patents, creating a layered patent portfolio.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  1. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):

    • Companies developing similar compounds or formulations must analyze whether ES2344700’s claims cover their inventions, especially in overlapping chemical spaces.
  2. Infringement Risks:

    • The patent’s scope determines whether a generic manufacturer infringes upon it; narrow claims may narrow infringement scope, whereas broad claims pose higher risks.
  3. Licensing and Litigation:

    • Patent holders can monetize the patent via licensing; challengers must assess validity and scope for infringement defenses.
  4. Regulatory and Market Entry:

    • Patent protection can delay generic entry, providing a competitive advantage, especially if combined with regulatory exclusivities.

Comparative Patent Landscape

European and International Context

  • The patent’s thematic focus must be contrasted with patents filed under the European Patent Convention (EPC) and in PCT.
  • Cross-referencing with Europe’s supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can extend market exclusivity if granted.
  • The landscape includes active patents covering similar compounds or uses, which could be grouped into patent thickets or blocking patents.

Patent Expiry & Innovation Pipeline

  • Evaluating patent expiration dates guides market planning and innovation strategy.
  • In cases where patents are close to expiry, lifecycle management strategies like formulation patents or new indications become relevant.

Conclusion

Patent ES2344700 exemplifies targeted intellectual property protection within Spain’s pharmaceutical landscape. Its claims, crafted to encompass a specific chemical entity, likely focus on establishing an innovative lead compound or therapeutic use. The scope and validity depend heavily on prior art and claim language precision, with strategic significance for both patent holders and competitors.

Effective navigation of this patent landscape requires continuous monitoring of related patents and regulatory developments. The patent’s strength lies in its claim drafting and strategic positioning within broader IP portfolios, enabling market exclusivity and competitive leverage.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: Thorough analysis of the patent claims reveals whether the protection is broad or narrowly tailored—critical for infringement and validity considerations.
  • Landscape Position: ES2344700’s value depends on its relation to existing patents and the extent of overlapping claims. A comprehensive patent landscape helps identify potential challenges and opportunities.
  • Legal Strategy: Firms should evaluate potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and expiration timelines to optimize market entry and lifecycle management.
  • Protection Optimization: Combining this patent with other patent rights—formulations, methods, or additional claims—can reinforce market protection.

FAQs

Q1: How does patent ES2344700 compare to similar patents in Europe?
A: It generally shares structural and therapeutic features with European patents but may differ in claim scope, prosecution history, and specific claim language, influencing its enforceability across jurisdictions.

Q2: When is this patent likely to expire?
A: Assuming typical filing and grant timelines, most pharmaceutical patents expire 20 years from the filing date unless extended via SPCs or patent term adjustments.

Q3: Can generic companies challenge this patent?
A: Yes, through patent opposition, invalidity proceedings, or designing around claims. The strength of its claims influences the viability of such challenges.

Q4: What strategies can patent holders employ to extend protection?
A: Filing additional patents for formulations, new uses, or manufacturing processes, and applying for SPCs can prolong market exclusivity.

Q5: How does this patent impact the development of biosimilars or generics?
A: It may serve as a blocking patent in Spain, delaying generic entry unless it is invalidated or designed around.


References

  1. OEPM Patent Database: Public record of patent ES2344700.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO): Patent family and related patents analysis.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): PCT application data.
  4. Legal and Patent Literature: Standard practices for claim drafting and landscape analysis in pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.